Skip to main content

Making Data Meaningful: The Business Intelligence Model and Its Formal Semantics in Description Logics

  • Conference paper
Book cover On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2012 (OTM 2012)

Abstract

Business Intelligence (BI) offers great opportunities for strategic analysis of current and future business operations; however, existing BI tools typically provide data-oriented responses to queries, difficult to understand in terms of business objectives and strategies. To make BI data meaningful, we need a conceptual modeling language whose primitive concepts represent business objectives, processes, opportunities and threats. We have previously introduced such a language, the Business Intelligence Model (BIM). In this paper we consolidate and rationalize earlier work on BIM, giving a precise syntax, reducing the number of fundamental concepts by using meta-attributes, and introducing the novel notion of “pursuit”. Significantly, we also provide a formal semantics of BIM using a subset of the OWL Description Logic (DL). Using this semantics as a translation, DL reasoners can be exploited to (1) propagate evidence and goal pursuit in support of “what if?” reasoning, (2) allow extensions to the BIM language, (3) detect inconsistencies in specific BIM models, and (4) automatically classify defined concepts relative to existing concepts, organizing the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Object Management Group, Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0 (2009), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0

  2. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes, pp. 1–4. Harvard Business School Press (September 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dealtry, T.R.: Dynamic SWOT Analysis. Dynamic SWOT Associates (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yu, E.: Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE 1997), vol. 97, pp. 226–235 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dardenne, A., Lamsweerde, A.V., Fickas, S.: Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Science of Computer Programming 20(1-2), 3–50 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. W3C, OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Manchester Syntax (2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-manchester-syntax/

  8. Jiang, L., Barone, D., Amyot, D., Mylopoulos, J.: Strategic Models for Business Intelligence. In: Jeusfeld, M., Delcambre, L., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2011. LNCS, vol. 6998, pp. 429–439. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Barone, D., Jiang, L., Amyot, D., Mylopoulos, J.: Composite Indicators for Business Intelligence. In: Jeusfeld, M., Delcambre, L., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2011. LNCS, vol. 6998, pp. 448–458. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Barone, D., Yu, E., Won, J., Jiang, L., Mylopoulos, J.: Enterprise Modeling for Business Intelligence. In: van Bommel, P., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Overbeek, S., Proper, E., Barjis, J. (eds.) PoEM 2010. LNBIP, vol. 68, pp. 31–45. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Barone, D., Jiang, L., Amyot, D., Mylopoulos, J.: Reasoning with Key Performance Indicators. In: Johannesson, P., Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L. (eds.) PoEM 2011. LNBIP, vol. 92, pp. 82–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Borgida, A., Horkoff, J., Mylopoulos, J., Rosati, R.: Experiences in Mapping the Business Intelligence Model to Description Logics, and the Case for Parametric Concepts. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Workshop on Description Logics, DL 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Datamonitor, Global Credit & Charge Cards Industry Profile (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Giorgini, P., Mylopoulos, J., Nicchiarelli, E., Sebastiani, R.: Formal Reasoning Techniques for Goal Models. In: Spaccapietra, S., March, S., Aberer, K. (eds.) Journal on Data Semantics I. LNCS, vol. 2800, pp. 1–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Sebastiani, R., Giorgini, P., Mylopoulos, J.: Simple and Minimum-Cost Satisfiability for Goal Models. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3084, pp. 20–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Amyot, D., Ghanavati, S., Horkoff, J., Mussbacher, G., Peyton, L., Yu, E.: Evaluating goal models within the goal-oriented requirement language. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 25(8), 841–877 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Berardi, D., Calvanese, D., Degiacomo, G.: Reasoning on UML class diagrams. Artificial Intelligence 168(1-2), 70–118 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Wetzel, T.: States of Affairs. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2008 Edition (2008), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/states-of-affairs

  19. Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A.: WonderWeb Deliverable D18. The WonderWeb Library of Foundational Ontologies and the DOLCE ontology (December 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Krötzsch, M., Rudolph, S., Hitzler, P.: Description Logic Rules. In: Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2008), pp. 80–84 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Opdahl, A.L., Berio, G., Harzallah, M., Matulevicius, R.: An ontology for enterprise and information systems modelling. Applied Ontology 7(1), 49–92 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Du, J., Pan, J.Z.: Towards Practical ABox Abduction in Large OWL DL Ontologies. In: Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1160–1165 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Guarino, N., Welty, C.A.: An Overview of OntoClean. Handbook on Ontologies 48(1), 1–20 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Barone, D., Topaloglou, T., Mylopoulos, J.: Business Intelligence Modeling in Action: A Hospital Case Study. In: Ralyté, J., Franch, X., Brinkkemper, S., Wrycza, S. (eds.) CAiSE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7328, pp. 502–517. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Bunge, M.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Vol 1-8. Ontology I The Furniture of the World Boston Reidel (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Opdahl, A.L.: Anatomy of the Unified Enterprise Modelling Ontology. In: van Sinderen, M., Johnson, P. (eds.) IWEI 2011. LNBIP, vol. 76, pp. 163–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Borgida, A.: Description Logics in Data Management. Data Engineering 7(5), 671–682 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Iannone, L., Rector, A.: Calculations in OWL. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop OWL: Experiences and Directions, OWLED (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Horkoff, J. et al. (2012). Making Data Meaningful: The Business Intelligence Model and Its Formal Semantics in Description Logics. In: Meersman, R., et al. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2012. OTM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7566. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33615-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33615-7_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33614-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33615-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics