Skip to main content

Appearance Similarity Flow for Quantification of Anatomical Landmark Uncertainty in Medical Images

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 7431))

Abstract

Anatomical landmarks can play key roles in medical image understanding including segmentation. For example, statistical shape model-based segmentation can be enhanced with landmark information which helps parameter initialization such as pose and locations of models. We have been working on local appearance-based landmark detection scheme. When we define landmarks with surrounding appearance in medical images, certain uncertainty is observed depending on local intensity structures around the landmark. It is obvious that good landmarks should have low uncertainty and also that uncertainty causes difficulty in consistent evaluation of landmark localization error. In this paper, we describe our method for landmark uncertainty quantification based on arrival times of level-set evolution named appearance similarity flow, controlled by similarity between landmark appearance and that of the location within whole image. By using 12 clinical CT dataset, the method was evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bookstein, L.: Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge University Press (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heimann, T., Meinzer, H.: Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: A review. Medical Image Analysis 13(4), 543–563 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rohr, K.: Landmark-Based Image Analysis: Using Geometric and Intensity Models. Springer (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Criminisi, A., Shotton, J., Robertson, D., Konukoglu, E.: Regression Forests for Efficient Anatomy Detection and Localization in CT Studies. In: Menze, B., Langs, G., Tu, Z., Criminisi, A., et al. (eds.) MICCAI 2010. LNCS, vol. 6533, pp. 106–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Nemoto, M., et al.: A unified framework for concurrent detection of anatomical landmarks for medical image understanding. In: Proc. SPIE, vol. 7962, pp. 79623E–79623E13 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hanaoka, S., et al.: Probabilistic Modeling of Landmark Distances and Structure for Anomaly-proof Landmark Detection. In: Proc. the Third Int. Workshop on Mathematical Foundations of Computational Anatomy 2011, pp. 159–169 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Westin, C.F., et al.: Processing and visualization of diffusion tensor MRI. Med. Img. Anal. 6(2), 93–108 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones, D.K., et al.: Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 42, 515–525 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. NVIDIA developer zone, http://developer.nvidia.com/

  10. Parker, G.J., et al.: Estimating distributed anatomical connectivity using fast marching methods and diffusion tensor imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Img. 21(5), 505–512 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tuytelaars, T., Mikolajczyk, K.: Local Invariant Feature Detectors: A Survey. Foundations and Trends in Computer Graphics and Vision 3(3), 177–280 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Koenderink, J.J., van Doorn, A.J.: Surface shape and curvature scales. Image Vision Comput. 10, 557–565 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boykov, Y., et al.: Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 23(11), 1222–1239 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baka, N., Metz, C., Schaap, M., Lelieveldt, B., Niessen, W., de Bruijne, M.: Comparison of Shape Regression Methods under Landmark Position Uncertainty. In: Fichtinger, G., Martel, A., Peters, T. (eds.) MICCAI 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6892, pp. 434–441. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Rubin, E.: Figure and Ground. In: Yantis, S. (ed.) Visual Perception, pp. 225–229. Psychology Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Masutani, Y., Nemoto, M., Hanaoka, S., Hayashi, N., Ohtomo, K. (2012). Appearance Similarity Flow for Quantification of Anatomical Landmark Uncertainty in Medical Images. In: Bebis, G., et al. Advances in Visual Computing. ISVC 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7431. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33179-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33179-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33178-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33179-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics