Abstract
This paper presents a semantics for dynamic argumentation frameworks. A dynamic argumentation system involves the concept of execution of an argumentation affecting subsequent arguments. Although such dynamic treatment is necessary to grasp the behavior of actual argumentation, semantics proposed to date can only handle the static aspects. Here, we present a new semantics that fits dynamic argumentation. We discuss what properties hold and explain how to compute changes in the set of acceptable arguments, depending on the presentation order of arguments.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amgoud, L., Parsons, S., Maudet, N.: Arguments, dialogue, and negotiation. In: ECAI 2000, pp. 338–342 (2000)
Amgoud, L., Vesic, S.: Repairing preference-based argumentation frameworks. In: IJCAI 2009, pp. 665–670 (2009)
Baroni, P., Giacomin, M.: Comparing Argumentation Semantics with Respect to Skepticism. In: Mellouli, K. (ed.) ECSQARU 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4724, pp. 210–221. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Dunne, P.: Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 171, 619–641 (2007)
Cayrol, C., de St-Cyr, F.D., Lagasquie-Shiex, M.-C.: Change in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: Adding an Argument. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 38, 49–84 (2010)
Caminada, M.: Semi-stable semantics. In: COMMA 2006, pp. 121–130 (2006)
Chesnevar, C.I., Maguitman, A., Loui, R.: Logical models of argument. ACM Computing Surveys 32(4), 337–383 (2005)
Cobo, M.L., Martinez, D.C., Simari, G.R.: An approach to timed abstract argumentation. In: NMR 2010, Workshop on Argument, Dialog and Decision (2010)
Coste-Marquis, S., Devred, C., Marquis, P.: Prudent semantics for argumentation frameworks. In: ICTAI 2005, pp. 568–572 (2005)
Dunne, P.E., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Coherence in finite argument system. Artificial Intelligence 141(1-2), 187–203 (2002)
Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 321–357 (1995)
Dung, P.M., Mancarella, P., Toni, F.: A dialectic procedure for sceptical, assumption-based argumentation. In: COMMA 2006, pp. 145–156 (2006)
García, A., Simari, G.: Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 4(1), 95–138 (2004)
García, A., Chesnevar, C., Rotstein, N., Simari, G.: An abstract presentation of dialectical explanations in defeasible argumentation. In: ArgNMR 2007, pp. 17–32 (2007)
Hamblin, C.: Fallacies, Methuen (1970)
Modgil, S.: Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence 173(9-10), 901–1040 (2009)
Moguillansky, M.O., et al.: Argument theory change applied to defeasible logic programming. In: AAAI 2008, pp. 132–137 (2008)
Prakken, H.: Combining skeptical epistemic reasoning with credulous practical reasoning. In: COMMA 2006, pp. 311–322 (2006)
Okuno, K., Takahashi, K.: Argumentation system with changes of an agent’s knowledge base. In: IJCAI 2009, pp. 226–232 (2009)
Okuno, K., Takahashi, K.: Argumentation System Allowing Suspend/Resume of an Argumentation Line. In: McBurney, P., Rahwan, I., Parsons, S. (eds.) ArgMAS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6614, pp. 248–267. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Rahwan, I., Simari, G. (eds.): Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence. Springer (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Takahashi, K., Nambu, Y. (2012). A Semantics for Dynamic Argumentation Frameworks. In: McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Rahwan, I. (eds) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ArgMAS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7543. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33152-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33152-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33151-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33152-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)