Skip to main content

Aligning Event Logs and Declarative Process Models for Conformance Checking

  • Conference paper
Business Process Management (BPM 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7481))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Process mining can be seen as the “missing link” between data mining and business process management. Although nowadays, in the context of process mining, process discovery attracts the lion’s share of attention, conformance checking is at least as important. Conformance checking techniques verify whether the observed behavior recorded in an event log matches a modeled behavior. This type of analysis is crucial, because often real process executions deviate from the predefined process models. Although there exist solid conformance checking techniques for procedural models, little work has been done to adequately support conformance checking for declarative models. Typically, traces are classified as fitting or non-fitting without providing any detailed diagnostics. This paper aligns event logs and declarative models, i.e., events in the log are related to activities in the model if possible. The alignment provides then sophisticated diagnostics that pinpoint where deviations occur and how severe they are. The approach has been implemented in ProM and has been evaluated using both synthetic logs and real-life logs from Dutch municipalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P., de Beer, H.T., van Dongen, B.F.: Process Mining and Verification of Properties: An Approach Based on Temporal Logic. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) CoopIS/DOA/ODBASE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3760, pp. 130–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H.: Declarative Workflows: Balancing Between Flexibility and Support. Computer Science - R&D, 99–113 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining - Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B.F.: Replaying history on process models for conformance checking and performance analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 2(2), 182–192 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance Checking Using Cost-Based Fitness Analysis. In: IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 55–64. IEEE Computer Society (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Awad, A., Decker, G., Weske, M.: Efficient Compliance Checking Using BPMN-Q and Temporal Logic. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 326–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bauer, A., Leucker, M., Schallhart, C.: Runtime Verification for LTL and TLTL. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dechter, R., Pearl, J.: Generalized best-first search strategies and the optimality of A*. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 32, 505–536 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Governatori, G., Milosevic, Z., Sadiq, S.W.: Compliance Checking Between Business Processes and Business Contracts. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 221–232. IEEE Computer Society (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Greco, G., Guzzo, A., Pontieri, L., Sacca, D.: Discovering expressive process models by clustering log traces. IEEE Trans. on Knowl. and Data Eng. 18(8), 1010–1027 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hulstijn, J., Gordijn, J.: Risk analysis for inter-organizational controls. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems. SciTePress (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Dongen, B.F.: Data- and Resource-Aware Conformance Checking of Business Processes. In: Abramowicz, W., Kriksciuniene, D., Sakalauskas, V. (eds.) BIS 2012. LNBIP, vol. 117, pp. 48–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Maggi, F.M., Bose, R.P.J.C., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Efficient Discovery of Understandable Declarative Process Models from Event Logs. In: Ralyté, J., Franch, X., Brinkkemper, S., Wrycza, S. (eds.) CAiSE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7328, pp. 270–285. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maggi, F.M., Mooij, A.J., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: User-guided discovery of declarative process models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining, CIDM 2011, pp. 192–199. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Munoz-Gama, J., Carmona, J.: Enhancing precision in process conformance: Stability, confidence and severity. In: IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM 2011), pp. 184–191 (April 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rozinat, A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Conformance Checking of Processes Based on Monitoring Real Behavior. Information Systems 33(1), 64–95 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vasarhelyi, M., Alles, M., Kogan, A.: Principles of Analytic Monitoring for Continuous Assurance. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting 1(1), 1–21 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Verbeek, H.M.W., Buijs, J.C.A.M., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: XES, xESame, and proM 6. In: Soffer, P., Proper, E. (eds.) CAiSE Forum 2010. LNBIP, vol. 72, pp. 60–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Westergaard, M.: Better Algorithms for Analyzing and Enacting Declarative Workflow Languages Using LTL. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 83–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Westergaard, M., Maggi, F.M.: Declare: A tool suite for declarative workflow modeling and enactment. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 820. CEUR-WS.org (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Leoni, M., Maggi, F.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P. (2012). Aligning Event Logs and Declarative Process Models for Conformance Checking. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7481. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32884-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32885-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics