Abstract
One of the presuppositions of science since the times of Galileo, Newton, Laplace, and Descartes has been the predictability of the world. This idea has strongly influenced scientific and technological models. However, in recent decades, chaos and complexity have shown that not every phenomenon is predictable, even if it is deterministic. If a problem space is predictable, in theory we can find a solution via optimization. Nevertheless, if a problem space is not predictable, or it changes too fast, very probably optimization will offer obsolete solutions. This occurs often when the immediate solution affects the problem itself. An alternative is found in adaptation. An adaptive system will be able to find by itself new solutions for unforeseen situations.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bar-Yam, Y.: Dynamics of Complex Systems. Addison-Wesley, http://www.necsi.org/publications/dcs/ (accessed May 10, 2012)
Berlekamp, E.R., Conway, J.H., Guy, R.K.: What Is Life. In: Berlekamp, E.R., Conway, J.H., Guy, R.K. (eds.) Winning Ways for Your Mathematical Plays, vol. 2: Games in Particular, pp. 817–850. Academic Press, London (1982)
Cools, S.B., Gershenson, C., D’Hooghe, B.: Self-organizing traffic lights: A realistic simulation. In: Prokopenko, M. (ed.) Self-Organization: Applied Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 41–49. Springer, London (2007)
Elert, G.: The Chaos Hypertextbook (1995), http://hypertextbook.com/chaos (accessed May 10, 2012)
Gershenson, C.: Modelling Emotions with Multidimensional Logic. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society (NAFIPS 1999), New York City, NY, pp. 42–46 (1999), http://cogprints.org/1479/
Gershenson, C.: Introduction to Chaos in Deterministic Systems. Formal Computational Skills. Teaching Package, COGS, University of Sussex (2002a), http://arxiv.org/abs/nlin.CD/0308023 (accessed May 10, 2012)
Gershenson, C.: Contextuality: A Philosophical Paradigm, with Applications to Philosophy of Cognitive XE ”cognition” Science. Philosophy of Cognitive XE ”cognition” Science Essay, COGS, University of Sussex. (2002b), http://cogprints.org/2621/ (accessed May 10, 2012)
Gershenson, C.: Self-Organizing Traffic Lights. Complex Systems 16(1), 29–53 (2005)
Gershenson, C.: Design and Control of Self-organizing Systems. CopIt ArXives, Mexico. TS0002EN (2007)
Gershenson, C.: The Implications of Interactions for Science and Philosophy. C3 Report (April 2011a), http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.2827 (accessed May 10, 2012)
Gershenson, C.: Self-Organization Leads to Supraoptimal Performance in Public Transportation Systems. PLoS ONE 6(6), e21469 (2001b), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021469
Gershenson, C., Heylighen, F.: When can we call a system Self-organizing? In: Banzhaf, W.T., Christaller, P., Dittrich, P., Kim, J.T., Ziegler, J. (eds.) 7th European Conference on Advances in Artificial Life, ECAL 2003, pp. 606–614. Springer, Dortmund (2003)
Gershenson, C., Heylighen, F.: How can we think the complex? In: Richardson, K. (ed.) Managing Organizational Complexity: Philosophy, Theory and Application, vol. 3, pp. 47–62. Information Age Publishing (2005)
Gershenson, C., Rosenblueth, D.A.: Self-organizing traffic lights at multiple-street intersections. Complexity 17(4), 23–39 (2012), http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.2829 (accessed May 10, 2012)
Gödel, K.: Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme, I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik 38, 173-198.
Holland, J. H.: Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. Helix books, Reading (1995)
Kauffman, S.A.: Reinventing the sacred: A new view of science, reason, and religion. Basic Books, New York (2008)
Morin, E.: Restricted complexity, general complexity. In: Gershenson, C., Aerts, D., Edmonds, B. (eds.) Worldviews, Science and Us: Philosophy and Complexity, pp. 5–29. World Scientific, Singapore (2007)
Priest, G., Tanaka, K.: Paraconsistent Logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1996), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-paraconsistent/ (accessed May 10, 2012)
Tarski, A.: The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4(3), 341–376 (1944)
Wilensky, U.: NetLogo (1999), http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo
Wolfram, S.: Theory and application of cellular automata. World Scientific, Singapore (1986)
Wolfram, S.: A New Kind of Science. Wolfram Media, Champaign (2002)
Wuensche, A., Lesser, M.J.: The global dynamics cellular automata: An atlas of basin of attraction fields of one-dimensional cellular automata. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1992)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gershenson, C. (2013). Facing Complexity: Prediction vs. Adaptation. In: Massip-Bonet, À., Bastardas-Boada, A. (eds) Complexity Perspectives on Language, Communication and Society. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32817-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32817-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32816-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32817-6
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)