Skip to main content

Imposing Restrictions over Temporal Properties in OWL: A Rule-Based Approach

  • Conference paper
Rules on the Web: Research and Applications (RuleML 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7438))

Abstract

Introducing the dimension of time in ontologies turns binary relations into ternary which cannot be handled by OWL. Approaches such as the N-ary relations or the 4D-fluents approach discussed in this work, offer satisfactory solutions to this problem. However, data and property semantics are not preserved in the resulting representations nor can they be handled by ordinary reasoners such as Pellet. We propose a rule-based solution to this problem using SWRL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batsakis, S., Petrakis, E.G.M.: SOWL: A Framework for Handling Spatio-Temporal Information in OWL 2.0. In: Bassiliades, N., et al. (eds.) RuleML 2011 - Europe. LNCS, vol. 6826, pp. 242–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Batsakis, S., Stravoskoufos, K., Petrakis, E.G.M.: Temporal Reasoning for Supporting Temporal Queries in OWL 2.0. In: König, A., Dengel, A., Hinkelmann, K., Kise, K., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6881, pp. 558–567. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Welty, C., Fikes, R.: A Reusable Ontology for Fluents in OWL. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 150, 226–236 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Renz, J., Nebel, B.: Qualitative Spatial Reasoning using Constraint Calculi. In: Handbook of Spatial Logics, pp. 161–215. Springer, Netherlands (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Horrocks, I., Kutz, O., Sattler, U.: The Even More Irresistible SROIQ. In: Proc. KR 2006, Lake District, UK (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U., Tobies, S.: Practical Reasoning for Expressive Description Logics. In: Logic for Programming and Automated Reasoning, vol. 1705, pp. 161–180. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. van Beek, P., Cohen, R.: Exact and approximate reasoning about temporal relations. Computational Intelligence 6(3), 132–147 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Batsakis, S., Petrakis, E.G.M. (2012). Imposing Restrictions over Temporal Properties in OWL: A Rule-Based Approach. In: Bikakis, A., Giurca, A. (eds) Rules on the Web: Research and Applications. RuleML 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7438. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32689-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32689-9_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32688-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32689-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics