Skip to main content

Rough Sets Methods for Working with Uncertainty

  • Conference paper
  • 1542 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7467))

Abstract

Firms of all sizes are forced to consider new collaboration partners in order to prosper. The process of partner selection requires both serious considerations and efficient decision making. Evaluating of firm’s collaboration options as well as a discussion of methods for ordering criteria applied for ranking selected options are the subject of this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Davey, B.A., Priestley, H.A.: Introduction to lattices and order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duntsch, I., Gediga, G.: Rough set data analysis: A road to non-invasive knowledge discovery. Methods Publishers (2000) ISBN: 190328001X

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fitting, M.: Kleene’s Logic, Generalized. Journal of Logic and Computation 1(6), 797–810 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Garcia, O.N., Moussavi, M.: A Six-Valued Logic for Representing Incomplete Knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, ISMVL, pp. 110–114. IEEE Computer Society Press, Charlotte (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garca-Duque, J., Lpez-Nores, M., Pazos-Arias, J., Fernndez-Vilas, A., Daz-Redondo, R., Gil-Solla, A., Blanco-Fernndez, Y., Ramos-Cabrer, M.: A Six-valued Logic to Reason about Uncertainty and Inconsistency in Requirements Specifications. Journal of Logic and Computation 16(2), 227–255 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Kleene, S.: Introduction to Metamathematics. D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc., New York (1952)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Moussavi, M., Garcia, O.N.: A Six-Valued Logic and Its Application to Artificial Intelligence. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Southeastern Logic Symposium (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 11, 341–356 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data, vol. 9. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Bierman, H., Smidt, S.: The Capital Budgeting Decision. Routledge, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Daugherty, D., Glenn Richey, R., Roath, A., Min, S., Chen, H., Arndt, A., Genchev, S.: Is collaboration paying off for firms? Business Horizons 49, 61–70 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Klein, G.A.: Recognition-Primed Decision Making. In: Klein, G.A. (ed.) Sources of Power: How people Make Decisions, pp. 15–30. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Layard, R., Glaister, S.: Cost-Benefit Analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nas, T.F.: Cost-benefit Analysis, Theory and Application. Sage Publications (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yao, Y.Y., Sai, Y.: 38. On Mining Ordering Rules. In: Terano, T., Nishida, T., Namatame, A., Tsumoto, S., Ohsawa, Y., Washio, T. (eds.) JSAI-WS 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2253, pp. 316–321. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Solesvik, M., Encheva, S.: Partner selection for interfirm collaboration in ship design. Industrial Management and Data Systems (IMDS) 110(5) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Solesvik, M., Encheva, S., Tumin, S.: Lattices and collaborative design in shipbuilding. International Journal of Business Information Systems 7(3), 309–326 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsumoto, S.: Modelling Medical Diagnostic Rules Based on Rough Sets. In: Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.) RSCTC 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1424, pp. 475–482. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Yao, Y.Y., Zhong, N.: An Analysis of Quantitative Measures Associated with Rules. In: Zhong, N., Zhou, L. (eds.) PAKDD 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1574, pp. 479–488. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Zirger, B.J., Maidique, M.: A model of new product development: an empirical test. Management Science 36, 867–883 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Encheva, S. (2012). Rough Sets Methods for Working with Uncertainty. In: Luo, Y. (eds) Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering. CDVE 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7467. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32609-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32609-7_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32608-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32609-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics