Skip to main content

Logistics Sprawl and Urban Freight Planning Issues in a Major Gateway City

The Case of Los Angeles

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Sustainable Urban Logistics: Concepts, Methods and Information Systems

Part of the book series: EcoProduction ((ECOPROD))

Abstract

This chapter examines the spatial patterns of freight and logistics activities and the planning and policy issues associated with them, using Los Angeles as a case study. The rapid increase in the number of freight facilities in Los Angeles in recent decades is discussed. An important aspect of the geography of the logistics industry in the Los Angeles metropolitan area is identified: “logistics sprawl”, which is the spatial deconcentration of logistics facilities and distribution centers. Local governments give explicit consideration to logistics activities, especially for the jobs and tax revenues they can generate in a time of economic difficulties. Two cities are examined in detail: one is a traditionally industrial city close to the downtown area, the other is a sprawling community of the “Inland Empire,” east of the L.A. metro area. Both cities tell the story of the seemingly inescapable rise in the importance of the warehousing/logistics industry in the economic life of working class areas, raising questions about the pros and cons of logistics activities for local communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cross-dock facilities are the terminals used in the parcel (less than truck load) and express transport industries.

  2. 2.

    METRANS is a joint research center from the University of Southern California and California State University of Long Beach.

  3. 3.

    FAF is a compilation of freight databases made by the US DOT. http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/faf/.

  4. 4.

    The Alameda Corridor is a 20 mile freight rail infrastructure connecting the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach to intermodal railyards in downtown Los Angeles.

  5. 5.

    These are fiscal years, i.e. from July 1 to June 30.

  6. 6.

    North American Industry Classification System.

  7. 7.

    The NAICS replaced the SIC in 1997 to take better account of new and expanding industries. Correspondence tables between SIC and NAICS exist. The city of Vernon’s business listings continue to use the SIC coding system.

  8. 8.

    I have selected 20 business types out of a total of 128 in the databases. These 20 types selected are those more obviously dealing with warehousing and distribution activities.

  9. 9.

    General Warehousing and Storage, Refrigerated Warehousing and Storage, Special Warehousing and Storage, Not Elsewhere Classified.

  10. 10.

    North American Industry Classification System.

  11. 11.

    http://www.census.gov/econ/cbp/index.html (last accessed on April 26, 2012).

  12. 12.

    Interviews: city of Moreno Valley, John Terell, AICP, Planning Official, April 18, 2012; city of Vernon, Kevin Wilson, Director of Community, Services and Water, May 7, 2012; WRCOG (Western Riverside Council of Government), Ruthanne Taylor-Berger, Deputy Executive Director, May 23, 2012; Gateway Cities, Jerry Wood, Director of Transportation and Engineering, May 30, 2012; Los Angeles County, Connie Chung, Supervising Regional Planner, June 18, 2012. Questionnaires filled: cities of Santa Clarita and Palmdale.

  13. 13.

    Parcel, here, is to be understood in its planning sense (land lot). California parcel taxes are ‘qualified special taxes’ on specific properties whose revenue can be earmarked for any kind of specific target, such as schools.

  14. 14.

    Press release, February 9, 2012: "City staff has unveiled a proposal for enacting a special 23-cents-per-square-foot parcel tax assessment to raise $16 million in new revenue for the city general fund budget.… The $16 million in general fund revenues raised through the special parcel tax would be earmarked for support of police, fire, environmental health services and capital improvements…. Under the staff’s proposal, approximately 900 property owners in Vernon would be taxed 23-cents-per-square-foot as an assessment on the total land space on which their businesses operate. On average, the special parcel tax would amount to less than $50.00 per day per business assessed. Warehouse business owners presently paying a warehouse parcel tax would not be “double-taxed” on that portion of their property already subject to the warehouse parcel tax assessment."

  15. 15.

    LEED: Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. A set of standards for the design of green buildings.

References

  • Andreoli D, Goodchild A, Vitasek K (2010) The rise of mega distribution centers and the impact on logistical incertainty. Int J Transp Res 2:75–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen J (2008) Moving places: the geography of warehousing in the US. J Transp Geogr 16(6):379–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caltrans (2009) Healthy communities and healthy economies, a toolkit for goods movement. Caltrans, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge Systematics (2010) SCAG goods movement study task 5-freight works. Southern California Association of Governments, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinitz B (1960) Freight and the metropolis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopherson S, Belzer M (2009) The next move: metropolitan regions and the transformation of the freight transport and distribution system. In: Pindus N, Wial H, Wolman H (eds) Urban and regional policy and its effects, vol 2. Brookings, Washington DC, pp 194–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Cidell J (2010) Concentration and decentralisation: the new geography of freight distribution in US metropolitan areas. J Transp Geogr 18(3):363–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cidell J (2011) Distribution centers among the rooftops: the global logistics network meets the suburban spatial imaginary. Int J Urban Reg Res 35(4):832–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dablanc L (2007) Goods transport in large European cities: difficult to organize, difficult to modernize. Transp Res Part A 41:280–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Dablanc L, Rakotonarivo D (2010) The impacts of logistic sprawl: how does the location of parcel transport terminals affect the energy efficiency of goods’ movements in Paris and what can we do about it? Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2(3):6087–6096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dablanc L, Ross C (2012) Atlanta: a mega logistics center in the Piedmont Atlantic Megaregion (PAM). J Transp Geogr 24:432–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) (2004) Retail distribution centers: how new business processes impact minority labor markets, p. 32 www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/reports/retaildistribution/retaildistribution.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2011

  • Erie S (2004) Globalizing L.A., trade, infrastructure and regional development. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano G, O’Brien T, Dablanc L, Holliday K (2012) NCFRP Project 36(05) Synthesis of freight research in urban transportation planning. National Cooperative Freight Research Program, Washington D.C. (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E, Kohlhase J (2004) Cities, regions and the decline of transport costs. Papers Reg Sci 83:197–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, Hesse M, Rodrigue JP (2006) Reexploring the interface between economic and transport geography. Guest editorial. Environ Plan A 38:1401–1408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse M (2002) Changes in goods distribution and the city: physical distribution as an indicator of urban and regional development. In: Davies W, Townshend I (eds.) Monitoring cities: international perspectives. International Geographical Union, Urban Commission, Calgary and Berlin. ISBN: 0-88953-259-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse M (2004) Land for logistics: locational dynamics, real estate markets and political regulation of regional distribution complexes. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geographie 95(2):162–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse M, Rodrigue JP (2004) The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution. J Transp Geogr 12(3):171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husing J (2010) Dirt theory: How Southern California’s new subregions mature economically and its implications for the location of distribution facilities. Appendix E in Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Industrial Space in Southern California: Future Supply and Demand for Warehousing and Intermodal Facilities (Task 5 Report), June

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard W (1982) Methods of regional analysis: an introduction to regional science. Regional Science Reprints #3, Program in Urban and Regional Studies. Cornell University, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • LACMTA (Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority) (2004) Compendium of truck/freight information for the greater Los Angeles metropolitan area

    Google Scholar 

  • Leachman R (2012) Aisa-USA supply chains: a tutorial and recommendations. Powerpoint presentation at the California Maritime Leadership Symposium on February 1

    Google Scholar 

  • METRANS (2008) Integrating inland ports into the intermodal goods movement system for ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. University of Southern Californa, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Movahedi B, Lavassani K, Kumar V (2009) Transition to B2B e-marketplace enabled supply chain: readiness assessment and success factors. Int J Technol Knowl Soc 5(3):75–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigue JP (2004) Freight, gateways and mega-urban regions: the logistical integration of the BostWash corridor. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 95(2):147–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCAG (2011) 2012–2035 Regional transportation plan/sustainable communities strategy. Southern California Association of Governments, December, p. 219 http://rtpscs.scag.ca.gov/Documents/2012/draft/Draft_2012RTPSCS.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2013

  • Tioga Group and Cambridge Systematics (2003) Project 99-130: Goods movement truck and rail study executive summary. Prepared for the Southern California Association of Governments, January

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur Smith Associates (2008) Multi-county goods movement action plan. Technical Memorandum 4a: Freight Demand. April 30. http://www.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/14_Vol2_TM4a_043008.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2013

  • Woudsma C, Jensen J, Kanaroglou P, Maoh H (2008) Logistics land use and the city: a spatial-temporal modeling approach. Transp Res Part E: Logistics Transp Rev 44(2):277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This chapter presents some of the results of the “MEGAREGION” project made possible thanks to a 2011–2012 partnership between IFSTTAR, the French Institute of Sciences and Technology for Transport, Development and Networks, and the University of Southern California, more specifically the METRANS Research Center headed by Professor Genevieve Giuliano. “MEGAREGION” also included research on Atlanta (Dablanc and Ross 2012). Parts of Sect. 1 use an updated version of the Atlanta research. I wish to thank the many practitioners and experts from Southern California who accepted to be interviewed and to share their views on logistics issues in Los Angeles during the first semester of 2012. Victoria Farr, a master’s student from USC Price School of Public Policy, contributed to the chapter by collecting, processing and mapping the geographical data in Sect. 3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laetita Dablanc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dablanc, L. (2014). Logistics Sprawl and Urban Freight Planning Issues in a Major Gateway City. In: Gonzalez-Feliu, J., Semet, F., Routhier, JL. (eds) Sustainable Urban Logistics: Concepts, Methods and Information Systems. EcoProduction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31788-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics