Abstract
This chapter examines the spatial patterns of freight and logistics activities and the planning and policy issues associated with them, using Los Angeles as a case study. The rapid increase in the number of freight facilities in Los Angeles in recent decades is discussed. An important aspect of the geography of the logistics industry in the Los Angeles metropolitan area is identified: “logistics sprawl”, which is the spatial deconcentration of logistics facilities and distribution centers. Local governments give explicit consideration to logistics activities, especially for the jobs and tax revenues they can generate in a time of economic difficulties. Two cities are examined in detail: one is a traditionally industrial city close to the downtown area, the other is a sprawling community of the “Inland Empire,” east of the L.A. metro area. Both cities tell the story of the seemingly inescapable rise in the importance of the warehousing/logistics industry in the economic life of working class areas, raising questions about the pros and cons of logistics activities for local communities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Cross-dock facilities are the terminals used in the parcel (less than truck load) and express transport industries.
- 2.
METRANS is a joint research center from the University of Southern California and California State University of Long Beach.
- 3.
FAF is a compilation of freight databases made by the US DOT. http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/faf/.
- 4.
The Alameda Corridor is a 20 mile freight rail infrastructure connecting the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach to intermodal railyards in downtown Los Angeles.
- 5.
These are fiscal years, i.e. from July 1 to June 30.
- 6.
North American Industry Classification System.
- 7.
The NAICS replaced the SIC in 1997 to take better account of new and expanding industries. Correspondence tables between SIC and NAICS exist. The city of Vernon’s business listings continue to use the SIC coding system.
- 8.
I have selected 20 business types out of a total of 128 in the databases. These 20 types selected are those more obviously dealing with warehousing and distribution activities.
- 9.
General Warehousing and Storage, Refrigerated Warehousing and Storage, Special Warehousing and Storage, Not Elsewhere Classified.
- 10.
North American Industry Classification System.
- 11.
http://www.census.gov/econ/cbp/index.html (last accessed on April 26, 2012).
- 12.
Interviews: city of Moreno Valley, John Terell, AICP, Planning Official, April 18, 2012; city of Vernon, Kevin Wilson, Director of Community, Services and Water, May 7, 2012; WRCOG (Western Riverside Council of Government), Ruthanne Taylor-Berger, Deputy Executive Director, May 23, 2012; Gateway Cities, Jerry Wood, Director of Transportation and Engineering, May 30, 2012; Los Angeles County, Connie Chung, Supervising Regional Planner, June 18, 2012. Questionnaires filled: cities of Santa Clarita and Palmdale.
- 13.
Parcel, here, is to be understood in its planning sense (land lot). California parcel taxes are ‘qualified special taxes’ on specific properties whose revenue can be earmarked for any kind of specific target, such as schools.
- 14.
Press release, February 9, 2012: "City staff has unveiled a proposal for enacting a special 23-cents-per-square-foot parcel tax assessment to raise $16 million in new revenue for the city general fund budget.… The $16 million in general fund revenues raised through the special parcel tax would be earmarked for support of police, fire, environmental health services and capital improvements…. Under the staff’s proposal, approximately 900 property owners in Vernon would be taxed 23-cents-per-square-foot as an assessment on the total land space on which their businesses operate. On average, the special parcel tax would amount to less than $50.00 per day per business assessed. Warehouse business owners presently paying a warehouse parcel tax would not be “double-taxed” on that portion of their property already subject to the warehouse parcel tax assessment."
- 15.
LEED: Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. A set of standards for the design of green buildings.
References
Andreoli D, Goodchild A, Vitasek K (2010) The rise of mega distribution centers and the impact on logistical incertainty. Int J Transp Res 2:75–88
Bowen J (2008) Moving places: the geography of warehousing in the US. J Transp Geogr 16(6):379–387
Caltrans (2009) Healthy communities and healthy economies, a toolkit for goods movement. Caltrans, Los Angeles
Cambridge Systematics (2010) SCAG goods movement study task 5-freight works. Southern California Association of Governments, Los Angeles
Chinitz B (1960) Freight and the metropolis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Christopherson S, Belzer M (2009) The next move: metropolitan regions and the transformation of the freight transport and distribution system. In: Pindus N, Wial H, Wolman H (eds) Urban and regional policy and its effects, vol 2. Brookings, Washington DC, pp 194–222
Cidell J (2010) Concentration and decentralisation: the new geography of freight distribution in US metropolitan areas. J Transp Geogr 18(3):363–371
Cidell J (2011) Distribution centers among the rooftops: the global logistics network meets the suburban spatial imaginary. Int J Urban Reg Res 35(4):832–851
Dablanc L (2007) Goods transport in large European cities: difficult to organize, difficult to modernize. Transp Res Part A 41:280–285
Dablanc L, Rakotonarivo D (2010) The impacts of logistic sprawl: how does the location of parcel transport terminals affect the energy efficiency of goods’ movements in Paris and what can we do about it? Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2(3):6087–6096
Dablanc L, Ross C (2012) Atlanta: a mega logistics center in the Piedmont Atlantic Megaregion (PAM). J Transp Geogr 24:432–442
EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) (2004) Retail distribution centers: how new business processes impact minority labor markets, p. 32 www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/reports/retaildistribution/retaildistribution.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2011
Erie S (2004) Globalizing L.A., trade, infrastructure and regional development. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Giuliano G, O’Brien T, Dablanc L, Holliday K (2012) NCFRP Project 36(05) Synthesis of freight research in urban transportation planning. National Cooperative Freight Research Program, Washington D.C. (forthcoming)
Glaeser E, Kohlhase J (2004) Cities, regions and the decline of transport costs. Papers Reg Sci 83:197–228
Hall P, Hesse M, Rodrigue JP (2006) Reexploring the interface between economic and transport geography. Guest editorial. Environ Plan A 38:1401–1408
Hesse M (2002) Changes in goods distribution and the city: physical distribution as an indicator of urban and regional development. In: Davies W, Townshend I (eds.) Monitoring cities: international perspectives. International Geographical Union, Urban Commission, Calgary and Berlin. ISBN: 0-88953-259-1
Hesse M (2004) Land for logistics: locational dynamics, real estate markets and political regulation of regional distribution complexes. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geographie 95(2):162–173
Hesse M, Rodrigue JP (2004) The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution. J Transp Geogr 12(3):171–184
Husing J (2010) Dirt theory: How Southern California’s new subregions mature economically and its implications for the location of distribution facilities. Appendix E in Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Industrial Space in Southern California: Future Supply and Demand for Warehousing and Intermodal Facilities (Task 5 Report), June
Isard W (1982) Methods of regional analysis: an introduction to regional science. Regional Science Reprints #3, Program in Urban and Regional Studies. Cornell University, Ithaca
LACMTA (Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority) (2004) Compendium of truck/freight information for the greater Los Angeles metropolitan area
Leachman R (2012) Aisa-USA supply chains: a tutorial and recommendations. Powerpoint presentation at the California Maritime Leadership Symposium on February 1
METRANS (2008) Integrating inland ports into the intermodal goods movement system for ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. University of Southern Californa, Los Angeles
Movahedi B, Lavassani K, Kumar V (2009) Transition to B2B e-marketplace enabled supply chain: readiness assessment and success factors. Int J Technol Knowl Soc 5(3):75–88
Rodrigue JP (2004) Freight, gateways and mega-urban regions: the logistical integration of the BostWash corridor. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 95(2):147–161
SCAG (2011) 2012–2035 Regional transportation plan/sustainable communities strategy. Southern California Association of Governments, December, p. 219 http://rtpscs.scag.ca.gov/Documents/2012/draft/Draft_2012RTPSCS.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2013
Tioga Group and Cambridge Systematics (2003) Project 99-130: Goods movement truck and rail study executive summary. Prepared for the Southern California Association of Governments, January
Wilbur Smith Associates (2008) Multi-county goods movement action plan. Technical Memorandum 4a: Freight Demand. April 30. http://www.metro.net/projects_studies/mcgmap/images/14_Vol2_TM4a_043008.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2013
Woudsma C, Jensen J, Kanaroglou P, Maoh H (2008) Logistics land use and the city: a spatial-temporal modeling approach. Transp Res Part E: Logistics Transp Rev 44(2):277–297
Acknowledgments
This chapter presents some of the results of the “MEGAREGION” project made possible thanks to a 2011–2012 partnership between IFSTTAR, the French Institute of Sciences and Technology for Transport, Development and Networks, and the University of Southern California, more specifically the METRANS Research Center headed by Professor Genevieve Giuliano. “MEGAREGION” also included research on Atlanta (Dablanc and Ross 2012). Parts of Sect. 1 use an updated version of the Atlanta research. I wish to thank the many practitioners and experts from Southern California who accepted to be interviewed and to share their views on logistics issues in Los Angeles during the first semester of 2012. Victoria Farr, a master’s student from USC Price School of Public Policy, contributed to the chapter by collecting, processing and mapping the geographical data in Sect. 3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dablanc, L. (2014). Logistics Sprawl and Urban Freight Planning Issues in a Major Gateway City. In: Gonzalez-Feliu, J., Semet, F., Routhier, JL. (eds) Sustainable Urban Logistics: Concepts, Methods and Information Systems. EcoProduction. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31788-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31788-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31787-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31788-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)