Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Finance ((FINANCE))

  • 4295 Accesses

Abstract

The evaluation of market risk corresponds essentially to a forecast for the lower tails of the return distribution (i.e., the losses). The available risk methodologies are broadly classified into return-based and innovation-based methodologies. The limitations of the main return-based methodology—the historical method—are discussed. The innovation-based methodologies are more powerful, since they disentangle better the main components of the price dynamics, and since the connection with processes allow one to compute the required forecasts. Depending of the ARCH process used to model the financial time series, different risk methodologies can be constructed, with various trade-off between simplicity and accuracy. The difficulties related to the practical evaluations of market risks are discussed for target portfolio with sizes of the order of 10.000 complex contracts. Finally, the evaluation of the market risks should be validated by a proper backtesting procedure. A simple and powerful test is proposed and applied to one century of the Dow-Jones index. Surprisingly, the risk evaluation procedure works perfectly over such a long span of history.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Acerbi, C.: Spectral measures of risk: a coherent representation of subjective risk aversion. J. Bank. Finance 26, 1505–1518 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Acerbi, C., Tasche, D.: On the coherence of expected shortfall. J. Bank. Finance 26, 1487–1503 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Almeida, A., Goodhart, C.A.E., Payne, R.G.: The effects of macroeconomic news on high frequency exchange rate behavior. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 33(3), 383–408 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., Heath, D.: Thinking coherently. Risk Mag. 10(11), 68–71 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J.-M., Heath, D.: Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance 9(3), 203–228 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bisig, T., Dupuis, A., Impagliazzo, V., Olsen, R.B.: The Scale of Market Quakes (2009). See also www.olsenscale.com. arXiv:0909.1690

  7. Bormetti, G., Cisana, E., Montagna, G., Nicrosini, O.: Risk measures with non-Gaussian fluctuations. Technical report (2006). arXiv:physics/0607247

  8. Breymann, W., Zumbach, G., Dacorogna, M.M., Müller, U.A.: Dynamical deseasonalization in OTC and localized exchange-traded markets. Internal document WAB.2000-01-31, Olsen & Associates, Seefeldstrasse 233, 8008 Zürich, Switzerland (31 January 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell, S.D.: A review of backtesting and backtesting procedures. J. Risk 9(2), 1–17 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hull, J.C.: Options, Futures and Other Derivative Securities. Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maillet, B., Michel, T.: An index of market shocks based on multiscale analysis. Quant. Finance 3(2), 88–97 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Meucci, A.: Risk and Asset Allocation. Springer Finance (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mina, J., Xiao, J.: Return to riskmetrics: the evolution of a standard. Technical report, Risk Metrics Group (2001). Available at http://www.riskmetrics.com/pdf/rrmfinal.pdf

  14. Morgan, J.P.: RiskMetrics technical document. Technical report, J.P. Morgan and International marketing (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pafka, S., Kondor, I.: Evaluating the riskmetrics methodology in measuring volatility and value-at-risk in financial markets. Physica A 299, 305–310 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Richter, C.F.: Elementary Seismology vol. 1. Freeman, San Francisco (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenblatt, M.: Remarks on multivariate transformation. Ann. Math. Stat. 23, 1052–1057 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zumbach, G.: A gentle introduction to the RM2006 methodology. Technical report, Riskmetrics Group (2006). Available at http://www.riskmetrics.com and www.ssrn.com

  19. Zumbach, G.: The riskmetrics 2006 methodology. Technical report, RiskMetrics Group (2006). Available at: www.riskmetrics.com and www.ssrn.com

  20. Zumbach, G.: Back testing risk methodologies from one day to one year. J. Risk 9(2), 55–91 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zumbach, G., Dacorogna, M.M., Olsen, J.L., Olsen, R.B.: Market crises, shock of the new. Risk Mag. 13(3), 110–114 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zumbach, G., Dacorogna, M.M., Olsen, J.L., Olsen, R.B.: Measuring shock in financial markets. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 3(3), 347–355 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Zumbach, G., Finger, C.: An historical perspective on market risks using the DJIA index over one century. Wilmott Magazine (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zumbach, G., Müller, U.A.: Operators on inhomogeneous time series. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 4(1), 147–178 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zumbach, G. (2013). Processes and Market Risk Evaluation. In: Discrete Time Series, Processes, and Applications in Finance. Springer Finance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31742-2_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics