Abstract
In this chapter, I argue that some aspects of cognitive phenomena cannot be explained computationally. In the first part, I sketch a mechanistic account of computational explanation that spans multiple levels of organization of cognitive systems. In the second part, I turn my attention to what cannot be explained about cognitive systems in this way. I argue that information-processing mechanisms are indispensable in explanations of cognitive phenomena, and this vindicates the computational explanation of cognition. At the same time, it has to be supplemented with other explanations to make the mechanistic explanation complete, and that naturally leads to explanatory pluralism in cognitive science. The price to pay for pluralism, however, is the abandonment of the traditional autonomy thesis asserting that cognition is independent of implementation details.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, M.L., Rosenberg, G.: Content and action: The guidance theory of representation. Journal of Mind and Behavior 29(1-2), 55–86 (2008)
Barandiaran, X., Moreno, A.: Adaptivity: From Metabolism to Behavior. Adaptive Behavior 16(5), 325–344 (2008)
Bechtel, W.: Mental Mechanisms. Routledge, New York (2008)
Beer, R.D.: Dynamical approaches to cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(3), 91–99 (2000)
Bickhard, M.H., Terveen, L.: Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science: Impasse and solution. North-Holland (1995)
Cantwell Smith, B.: The foundations of computing. In: Scheutz, M. (ed.) Computationalism: New Directions. MIT Press (2002)
Chrisley, R.: Transparent computationalism. In: Scheutz, M. (ed.) New Computationalism, pp. 105–121. Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin (2000)
Clark, A.: Mindware: An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)
Conklin, J., Eliasmith, C.: A controlled attractor network model of path integration in the rat. Journal of Computational Neuroscience 18(2), 183–203 (2005)
Craik, K.: The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1943)
Craver, C.F.: Explaining the Brain. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)
Cutland, N.: Computability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1980)
Dennett, D.C.: The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)
Dreyfus, H.: What Computers Can’t Do. Harper & Row, New York (1972)
Eliasmith, C.: How we ought to describe computation in the brain. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41(3), 313–320 (2010)
Elman, J.: Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14(2), 179–211 (1990)
Elman, J.: Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Machine Learning 7(2-3), 195–225 (1991)
Fodor, J.A.: The Language of Thought, 1st edn. Thomas Y. Crowell Company, New York (1975)
Fodor, J.A.: Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences III (1), 63–72 (1980)
Fresco, N.: Explaining Computation Without Semantics: Keeping it Simple. Minds and Machines 20(2), 165–181 (2010), doi:10.1007/s11023-010-9199-6.
Gomila, A.: Mending or Abandoning Cognitivism? In: Glenberg, A., de Vega, M., Glaesser, A. (eds.) Symbols, Embodiment and Meaning, pp. 357–374. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)
Grush, R.: The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery, and perception. The Behavioral and brain sciences 27(3), 377–396 (2004)
Harnad, S.: The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42, 335–346 (1990)
Lund, H.H., Webb, B., Hallam, J.: A robot attracted to the cricket species Gryllus Bimaculatus. In: Husbands, P., Harvey, I. (eds.) Fourth European Conference on Artificial Life. MIT Press (1997)
Machamer, P., Darden, L., Craver, C.F.: Thinking about Mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 67(1), 1–25 (2000)
Marr, D.: Vision. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York (1982)
Maturana, H.R., Varela, F.J.: Autopoiesis and cognition. Reidel, Dordrecht (1980)
Meyer, D.E., Osman, A.M., Irwin, D.E., Yantis, S.: Modern mental chronometry. Biological Psychology 26(1-3), 3–67 (1988)
Miłkowski, M.: Is computationalism trivial? In: Dodig Crnkovic, G., Stuart, S. (eds.) Computation, Information, Cognition, pp. 236–246. Cambridge Scholars Press, Newcastle (2007)
Miłkowski, M.: Explaining the Computational Mind. MIT Press, Cambridge (forthcoming)
Newell, A., Simon, H.A.: Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1972)
Newell, A.: You can’t play 20 questions with nature and win. In: Chase, W.G. (ed.) Visual Information Processing, pp. 283–308. Academic Press, New York (1973)
O’Reilly, R.C.: Biologically based computational models of high-level cognition. Science 314(5796), 91–94 (2006)
Piccinini, G.: Computation without Representation. Philosophical Studies 137(2), 205–241 (2006), doi:10.1007/s11098-005-5385-4
Piccinini, G.: Computing Mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 74(4), 501–526 (2007)
Piccinini, G., Scarantino, A.: Information processing, computation, and cognition. Journal of Biological Physics 37(1), 1–38 (2010)
Piccinini, G., Craver, C.: Integrating psychology and neuroscience: functional analyses as mechanism sketches. Synthese 183(3), 283–311 (2011)
Pylyshyn, Z.W.: Computation and cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge (1984)
Rusanen, A.M., Lappi, O.: The Limits of Mechanistic Explanation in Neurocognitive Sciences. In: Proceedings of the European Cognitive Science Conference 2007. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2007)
Siegelmann, H.: Analog computation via neural networks. Theoretical Computer Science 131(2), 331–360 (1994)
Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C., Smith, L.B.: The dynamics of embodiment: a field theory of infant perseverative reaching. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24(1), 1–34 (2001)
Van Gelder, T.: What might cognition be, if not computation? The Journal of Philosophy 92(7), 345–381 (1995)
Vakarelov, O.: The cognitive agent: Overcoming informational limits. Adaptive Behavior 19(2), 83–100 (2011)
Walmsley, J.: Explanation in Dynamical Cognitive Science. Minds and Machines 18(3), 331–348 (2008)
Webb, B., Scutt, T.: A simple latency-dependent spiking-neuron model of cricket phonotaxis. Biological Cybernetics 82(3), 247–269 (2000)
Webb, B.: Using robots to model animals: a cricket test. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 16(2-4), 117–134 (1995)
Webb, B.: Using robots to understand animal behavior. Advances in the Study of Behavior 38, 1–58 (2008)
Wheeler, M.: Reconstructing the Cognitive World. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)
Zednik, C.: The Nature of Dynamical Explanation. Philosophy of Science 78(2), 238–263 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miłkowski, M. (2013). Limits of Computational Explanation of Cognition. In: Müller, V. (eds) Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 5. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31674-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31674-6_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31673-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31674-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)