Skip to main content

Breast Density into Clinical Practice

  • Conference paper
Breast Imaging (IWDM 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 7361))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

It is well established that breast density is related to breast cancer risk; making that connection precise, and understanding how to use it in clinical practice, has been a major academic focus since the 1970’s. However, it transpires that the first clinical uses of breast density have not been for risk prediction, rather they are for judging when to recommend further imaging. In this paper, we show how scientific research has had to be adapted in order to create the automated volumetric breast density assessment tool, Volpara®, to make it ready for actual clinical use and how it is impacting patient management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pisano, E., et al.: Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital versus Film Mammography: Exploratory Analysis of Selected Population Subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 246(2), 376 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arora, N., King, T.A., Jacks, L.M., Stempel, M.M., Patil, S., Morris, E., Morrow, M.: Impact of Breast Density on the Presenting Features of Malignancy. Ann. Surg. Oncolol. 17, S211–S218 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berg, W.A., et al.: Combined Screening with Ultrasound and Mammography vs Mammography Alone in Women at Elevated Risk of Breast Cancer. JAMA 303(15), 1482 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steenbergen, S., Weigert, J.: The Connecticut Experiment: The Role of Ultrasound in the Screening of Dense Breasts. RSNA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berg, W.A., Campassi, C., Langenberq, P., Sexton, M.J.: BIRADS: Inter-and Intra-Observer Variability in Feature Analysis and Final Assessment. AJR 174(6), 1769–1777 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Harvey, J.A., Bovbjerg, V.E.: Quantitative Assessment of Mammographic Density: Relationship with Breast Cancer Risk. Radiology 230, 29–41 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nicholson, B.T., LoRusso, A.P., Smolkin, M., Bovbjerg, V.E., Petroni, G.R., Harvey, J.A.: Accuracy of Assigned BI-RADS Breast Density Category Definitions. Acad. Radiology 13(9), 1143–1149 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ciatto, S., Visioli, C., Paci, E., Zappa, M.: Breast Density As a Determinant of Interval Cancer At Mammographic Screening. Breast Journal of Cancer 90, 393–396 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Martin, K.E., Helvie, M.A., Zhou, C., Roubidoux, M.A., Bailey, J.E., Paramaqul, C., Blane, C.E., Klein, K.A., Sonnad, S.S., Chan, H.P.: Mammographic Density Measured with Quantitative Computer-Aided Method: Comparison to Radiologists’ Estimates and BI-RADS categories. Radiology 240(3), 656–665 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ren, B., Smith, A.P., Marshall, J.: Investigation of Practical Scoring Methods for Breast Density. In: Martí, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, R. (eds.) IWDM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6136, pp. 651–658. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Ng, K.-H., Yip, C.-H., Taib, N.A.M.: Standardization of Clinical Breast Density Measurement. Lancet Oncology 13, 334 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Highnam, R., Brady, S.M., Yaffe, M.J., Karssemeijer, N., Harvey, J.: Robust Breast Composition Measurement - VolparaTM. In: Martí, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, R. (eds.) IWDM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6136, pp. 342–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Jeffreys, M., Harvey, J., Highnam, R.: Comparing a new volumetric breast density method (VolparaTM) to cumulus. In: Martí, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, R. (eds.) IWDM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6136, pp. 408–413. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Shepherd, J.A., Herve, L., Landau, J., Fan, B., Kerlikowske, K., Cummings, S.R.: Novel Use of Single X-ray Absorptiometry for Measuring Breast Density. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 4(2), 173–182 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Highnam, R., Brady, M.: Mammographic Image Analysis. Kluwer Academic Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van Engeland, S., Snoeren, P.R., Huisman, H., Boetes, C., Karssemeijer, N.: Volumetric Breast Density Estimation From Full-Field Digital Mammograms. IEEE Medical Imaging 25(3) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kopans, D.: Breast Imaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Highnam, R., Sauber, N., Destounis, S., Harvey, J., McDonald, D. (2012). Breast Density into Clinical Practice. In: Maidment, A.D.A., Bakic, P.R., Gavenonis, S. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7361. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_60

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31270-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31271-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics