Skip to main content

Dynamic Diagrams: A Composition Alternative

  • Conference paper
Diagrammatic Representation and Inference (Diagrams 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7352))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A major problem that learners face in comprehending animated diagrams is in decomposing the presented information into a form that furnishes appropriate raw material for building high quality mental models. This paper proposes an alternative to existing design approaches that shifts the prime focus from the nature of the external representation to the internal composition activity learners engage in during mental model construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lowe, R.K., Schnotz, W., Rasch, T.: Aligning affordances of graphics with learning task requirements. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 452–459 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hegarty, M.: The cognitive science of visual-spatial displays: Implications for design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1–29 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schnotz, W., Lowe, R.K.: A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In: Lowe, R.K., Schnotz, W. (eds.) Learning with Animation: Research Implications for Design, pp. 304–356. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Koning, B.B., Tabbers, H.K., Rikers, R.M.J.P., Paas, F.: Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review 21, 113–140 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lowe, R.K., Boucheix, J.-M.: Cueing complex animations: Does direction of attention foster learning processes? Learning and Instruction 21, 650–663 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kriz, S., Hegarty, M.: Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 65, 911–930 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amadieu, F., Mariné, C., Laimay, C.: The attention-guiding effect and cognitive load in the comprehension of animations. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 36–40 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mayer, R.E., Mathais, A., Wetzell, K.: Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: Evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8, 147–154 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lowe, R., Boucheix, J.-M.: Learning from Animated Diagrams: How Are Mental Models Built? In: Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Lee, J. (eds.) Diagrams 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5223, pp. 266–281. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Mayer, R.E.: Research-Based Principles for Learning with Animation. In: Lowe, R.K., Schnotz, W. (eds.) Learning with Animation. Research Implications for Design, pp. 30–48. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson-Laird, P.N.: How We Reason. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jahn, G., Knauff, M., Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Preferred mental models in reasoning about spatial relations. Memory & Cognition 35, 2075–2086 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hyönä, J.: The use of eye movements in the study of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction 20, 172–176 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Van Gog, T.: In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli. Learning and Instruction 20, 146–154 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurby, A., Zacks, J.: Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends in Cognitive Science 12, 72–79 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lowe, R.K., Boucheix, J.M.: Unfair Competition: Static. Cues in Animated Graphics. Poster presented at the Comprehension of Text and Graphic, SIG 2 Meeting, Tubingen, Germany (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Khooshabeh, P., Hegarty, M.: Inferring Cross-Sections: When Internal Visualizations Are More Important Than Properties of External Visualizations. Human Computer Interaction 25(2), 119–147 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lowe, R., Boucheix, J.-M.: Supporting Relational Processing in Complex Animated Diagrams. In: Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Lee, J. (eds.) Diagrams 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5223, pp. 391–394. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lowe, R., Boucheix, JM. (2012). Dynamic Diagrams: A Composition Alternative. In: Cox, P., Plimmer, B., Rodgers, P. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7352. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31223-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31223-6_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31222-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31223-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics