Skip to main content

Theory Reconstruction of Several Versions of Modern Organisation Theories

  • Chapter
Ontology, Epistemology, and Teleology for Modeling and Simulation

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems Reference Library ((ISRL,volume 44))

Abstract

This chapter compares the technique of reconstructing theory under the ‘non-statement view’ with the design and implementation of simulation models. For this purpose it uses several different versions of the famous ‘garbage can’ model, redefines this theoretical attempt in terms of the ‘non-statement view’ and compares it to simulation models of different authors who replicated the original ‘garbage can’ model and built on it to extend it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balzer, W., Manhart, K.: A social process in science and its content in a simulation program. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 14(4) (2011), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/14/4/11.html

  2. Balzer, W., Moulines, C.U., Sneed, J.D.: An Architectonic for Science. The Structuralist Program. Synthese Library, vol. 186. Reidel, Dordrecht (1987)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Carnap, R.: Philosophical Foundations of Physics. Basic Books, New York (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., Olsen, J.P.: A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Sciences Quarterly 17, 1–25 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Diederich, W., Ibarra, A., Mormann, T.: Bibliography of structuralism. Erkenntnis 30, 387–407 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diederich, W., Ibarra, A., Mormann, T.: Bibliography of structuralism II. Erkenntnis 41, 403–418 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Epstein, J.M.: Why model? Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 11(4) (2008), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/4/12.html

  8. Fioretti, G.: Computer code for the garbage can model (2012), http://www.cs.unibo.it/~fioretti/CODE/GC/index.html (last visit January 26, 2012)

  9. Fioretti, G., Lomi, A.: An agent-based representation of the garbage can model of organizational choice. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 11(1) (2008), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/1/1.html

  10. Fioretti, G., Lomi, A.: The garbage can model of organizational choice: An agent-based reconstruction. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 16(2), 192–217 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fioretti, G., Lomi, A.: Passing the buck in the garbage can model of organizational choice. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 16(2), 113–143 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heine, B.O., Meyer, M., Strangfeld, O.: Stylised facts and the contribution of simulation to the economic analysis of budgeting. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 8(4) (2005), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/8/4/4.html

  13. Kaldor, N.: Capital accumulation and economic growth. In: Lutz, F.A., Douglas, C. (eds.) The Theory of Capital, pp. 177–222. Macmillan, London (1961) (reprint)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lomi, A., Cacciaguerra, S.: Organizational decision chemistry on a lattice. In: The 2003 Swarmfest Conference, April 13-15 (2003), http://www.nd.edu/~swarm03/Program/Abstracts/LomiSwarm2003.pdf (April 21, 2012)

  15. Lotzmann, U., Meyer, R.: A declarative rule-based environment for agent modelling systems. In: The Seventh Conference of the European Social Simulation Association, ESSA 2011, Montpellier (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lotzmann, U., Meyer, R.: Drams - a declarative rule-based agent modelling system. In: Burczynski, T., Kolodziej, J., Byrski, A., Carvalho, M. (eds.) 25th European Conference on Modelling and Simulation, ECMS 2011, pp. 77–83. SCS Europe, Krakow (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moss, S., Gaylard, H., Wallis, S., Edmonds, B.: SDML: A multi-agent language for organizational modelling. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 4, 43–69 (1998), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=593039.593059 , doi:10.1023/A:1009600530279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Olsen, J.P.: Garbage cans, new institutionalism, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 95(1), 191–198 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sneed, J.D.: The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, 2nd edn. Synthese Library 35. Reidel, Dordrecht (1979)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Stegmüller, W.: The Structure and Dynamics of Theories. Springer, Berlin (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Stegmüller, W., Balzer, W., Spohn, W. (eds.): Philosophy of Economics. Studies in Contemporary Economics, vol. 2. Springer, Heidelberg (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tolk, A., Adams, K.M., Keating, C.B.: Towards Intelligence-Based Systems Engineering and System of Systems Engineering. In: Tolk, A., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Intelligence-Based Systems Engineering. ISRL, vol. 10, pp. 1–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Troitzsch, K.G.: Structuralist theory reconstruction and specification of simulation models in the social sciences. In: Westmeyer, H. (ed.) The Structuralist Program in Psychology: Foundations and Applications, pp. 71–86. Hogrefe & Huber, Seattle (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Troitzsch, K.G.: Modelling, simulation, and structuralism. In: Kuokkanen, M. (ed.) Structuralism and Idealization. Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, pp. 157–175. Editions Rodopi, Amsterdam (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Troitzsch, K.G.: The garbage can model of organisational behaviour: A theoretical reconstruction of some of its variants. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 16, 218–230 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Troitzsch, K.G.: Not all explanations predict satisfactorily, and not all good predictions explain. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 12(1), 10 (2009), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/1/10.html

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wilensky, U.: NetLogo (1999), http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo

  28. Zeigler, B.P.: Theory of Modelling and Simulation. Krieger, Malabar (1985) (reprint, first published in 1976, Wiley, New York, NY)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Troitzsch, K.G. (2013). Theory Reconstruction of Several Versions of Modern Organisation Theories. In: Tolk, A. (eds) Ontology, Epistemology, and Teleology for Modeling and Simulation. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 44. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31140-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31140-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31139-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31140-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics