Skip to main content

An Approach to Measure Understandability of Extended UML Based on Metamodel

  • Conference paper
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2012 (ICCSA 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7336))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2582 Accesses

Abstract

Since UML does not provide any guidance for users to select a proper extension pattern, users are not able to assure the quality of extended UMLs, such as understandability, when they focus on their expression power. A metric of understandability for extended UMLs is proposed, which bases on measuring the deviation of understandability between the extended UMLs and the standard UML in their metamodel level. Our proposal can be used to compare different extended UMLs with the same expression power on the understandability characteristic. Moreover, the proposal can guide users to select an appropriate extension pattern to achieve their goal. We give the definition of the metric of understandability and the empirical validation of the proposed metric. A case from a real project is used to explain the application of the proposed metric.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Object Management Group: UML semantics version 1.1. Document ad/97-08-04, OMG (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Object Management Group: Unified Model Language (UML): Superstructure version 2.1.2. Document formal/07-11-02, OMG (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Object Management Group: OMG Unified Model Language Specification Version 1.4. Document formal/01-09-67, OMG (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Object Management Group: Unified Model Language (UML): Superstructure version 2.0. Document formal/05-07-04, OMG (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, L., Ma, Z., Mei, H.: Modeling and checking for non-functional attributes in extended UML class diagram. In: Proceedings of 32nd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC 2008), pp. 100–107. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Wada, H., Suzuki, J., Oba, K.: Modeling non-functional aspects in service oriented architecture. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC 2006), pp. 222–229. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Amyot, D., Ghanavati, S., Horkoff, J., Mussbacher, G., Peyton, L., Yu, E.: Evaluating goal models within the goal-oriented requirement language. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 25(8), 841–877 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Genero, M., Poels, G., Manso, E., Piattini, M.: Defining and validating metrics for UML class diagrams. In: Genero, M., Piattini, M., Calero, C. (eds.) Metrics for Software Conceptual Models, pp. 99–159. Imperial College Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Genero, M., Piatini, M., Manso, E.: Finding “early” indicators of UML class diagrams understandability and modifiability. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE 2004), pp. 207–216. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Genero, M., Piattini, M., Manso, E., Cantone, G.: Building UML class diagram maintainability prediction models based on early metrics. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS 2003), pp. 263–275. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bansiya, J., Davis, C.G.: A hierarchical model for object-oriented design quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28(1), 4–17 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Object Management Group: Meta Object Facility (MOF) specification version 1.3. Document formal/00-04-03, OMG (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jiang, Y., Shao, W., Zhang, L., Ma, Z., Meng, X., Ma, H.: On the Classification of UML’s Meta Model Extension Mechanism. In: Baar, T., Strohmeier, A., Moreira, A., Mellor, S.J. (eds.) UML 2004. LNCS, vol. 3273, pp. 54–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ma, H., Shao, W., Zhang, L., Ma, Z., Jiang, Y.: Applying OO Metrics to Assess UML Meta-models. In: Baar, T., Strohmeier, A., Moreira, A., Mellor, S.J. (eds.) UML 2004. LNCS, vol. 3273, pp. 12–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Object Management Group: Meta Object Facility (MOF) core specification version 2.0. OMG Available Specification formal/06-01-01, OMG (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Briand, L.C., Wüst, J.: Modeling development effort in object-oriented systems using design properties. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 27(11), 963–986 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Ma, Z., Zhao, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, T. (2012). An Approach to Measure Understandability of Extended UML Based on Metamodel. In: Murgante, B., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2012. ICCSA 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7336. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31128-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31128-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31127-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31128-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics