Skip to main content

Cognitive Abduction and the Study of Visual Culture

  • Conference paper
Philosophy and Cognitive Science

Abstract

In this paper art history and visual studies, the disciplines that study visual culture, are presented as a field whose conjectural paradigm can be used to understand the epistemic problems associated with abduction. In order to do so, significant statements, concepts and arguments from the work of several specialists in this field have been highlighted. Their analysis shows the fruitfulness and potential for understanding the study of visual culture as a field that is interwoven with the assumptions of abductive cognition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aliseda, A.: Abductive Reasoning. Logical Investigations into Discovery and Explanation. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, D.R.: Creativity and the Philosophy of Charles Sanders Peirce. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, D.R.: The evolution of peirce’s concept of abduction. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 22(2), 145–164 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Argan, G.C.: Ideology and iconology. Critical Inquiry 2(2), 297–305 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Battaglia, F., Lisanby, S.H., Freedberg, D.: Corticomotor excitability during observation and imagination of a work of art. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5, 1–6 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Belting, H.: Bild-Anthropologie: Entwürfe für eine Bildwissenschaft. Fink, Munich (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brandom, R.: Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Didi-Huberman, G.: Atlas. \(\textquestiondown\) Cómo Llevar el Mundo a Cuestas? Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía, Madrid (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dikovitskaya, M.: Visual Culture. The Study of the Visual after the Cultural Turn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Freedberg, D.: Movement, embodiment, emotion. In: Dufrenne, T., Taylor, A.C. (eds.) Cannibalismes disciplinaires. Quand l’histoire de l’art et l’anthropologie se rencontrent, pp. 37–61. INHA/Musée du Quai Branly, Paris (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Freedberg, D., Gallese, V.: Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 11(5), 197–203 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedländer, M.J., Borenius, T.: On Art and Connoisseurship. B. Cassirer, London (1942)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J.: The Research of Abduction. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gallese, V.: Embodied simulation: from neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4, 23–48 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ginzburg, C.: Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  16. González-Navarro, M.: Interpretar y Argumentar. CSIC/Plaza y Valdés, Madrid and México (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. González-Navarro, M.: Intelligent environments and the challenge of inferential processes. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 72(2), 309–326 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. González-Navarro, M.: Hermenéutica. In: Vega-Reñón, L., Olmos, P. (eds.) Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica, pp. 271–276. Trotta, Madrid (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gorleé, D.: A eureka procedure: Pragmatic discovery in translation. European Journal for Semiotic Studies 8(2/3), 241–269 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gorleé, D.: On Translating Signs: Exploring Text and Semio-Translation. Rodopi, Amsterdam and New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hasenmueller, C.: Panofsky, iconography and semiotics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36(3), 289–301 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Holly, M.: Panofsky and the Foundations of Art History. Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ketner, K.: Peirce and Contemporary Thought: Philosophical Inquiries. Fordham University Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kolhas, J., Berzati, D., Haenni, R.: Probabilistic argumentation systems and abduction. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 34, 177–195 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lipps, T.: Die ästhetische Betrachtung und die bildende Kunst. Voss, Hamburg and Leipzig (1906)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lipton, P.: Inference to the best Explanation. Routledge, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Magnani, L.: Model-based and manipulative abduction in science. Foundation of Science 9(3), 219–247 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Magnani, L. (ed.): Abductive Cognition. The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning. Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Magnani, L., Ping, L. (eds.): Philosophical Investigations from a Perspective of Cognition. Guangdong People Publishing House, Guangzhou (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moxey, K.: Visual studies and the iconic turn. Journal of Visual Culture 7(2), 131–146 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Panofsky, E. (ed.): Meaning in the Visual Arts. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Peirce, C.: Collected Papers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Reilly, F.E. (ed.): Charles Peirce’s Theory of Scientific Method. Fordham University Press, New York (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Riegl, A.: Late Roman Art Industry. Giorgio Bretschneider Editore, Rome (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Riegl, A.: Problems of Style. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Riegl, A.: The Group Portraiture of Holland. Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities, Los Angeles (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rivadulla, A. (ed.): Éxito, Razón y Cambio en Física. Un Enfoque Instrumental en Teoría de la Ciencia. Trotta, Madrid (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shelley, C.: Visual abductive reasoning in archaeology. Philosophy of Science 53, 278–301 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sprevak, M.: Inference to the hypothesis of extended cognition. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41, 353–362 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Thagard, P.: The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice. The Journal of Philosophy 75, 76–92 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tursman, R. (ed.): Peirce’s Theory of Scientific Discovery. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vega, J.: Del pasado al futuro de la historia del arte en la universidad española. Ars Longa 16, 205–219 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Vega-Reñón, L.: Inferencia, argumentación y lógica. Contextos III(6), 47–72 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Vischer, R.: Über das optische Formgefühl: ein Beitrag zur Aesthetik. Ph.D. thesis, University of Tübingen (1872)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Walliser, B.: Abductive logics in a belief revision framework. Language and Information 14, 87–117 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Walton, D. (ed.): Character Evidence. An Abductive Theory. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Warburg, A.: Dürer and italian antiquity. In: The Renewal of Pagan Antiquity, pp. 553–731. Getty Research Institute for the History of Art and the Humanities, Los Angeles (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wölfflin, H.: Principles of Art History. Dover Publications, New York (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wölfflin, H.: Renaissance and Baroque. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wölfflin, H.: Prolegomena to a Psychology of Architecture. MIT, Cambridge (1976)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María G. Navarro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Navarro, M.G., de Haro García, N. (2012). Cognitive Abduction and the Study of Visual Culture. In: Magnani, L., Li, P. (eds) Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29928-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics