Skip to main content

Arms Control and Security Cooperation: Contending Approaches

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global and Regional Approaches to Arms Control in the Middle East

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace ((MEDITERRAN,volume 4))

  • 526 Accesses

Abstract

Arms control is but one of a series of alternative approaches to achieving international security through military strategies. Although the basic idea of arms control has its roots in the nineteenth century, the rise of modern arms control as a theory and practice can be traced to the Cold War era as an outcome of the American-Soviet nuclear arms race. In fact, arms control started to assume considerable importance in the field of security studies toward the late 1960s when the two superpowers entered their Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT) in Vienna and Helsinki in 1969 and concluded their first arms control agreement, SALT I, in 1972. Since then, the Americans, the Soviets and the Europeans have spent more than 30 years in discussing, negotiating, and signing different agreements on arms control in both the nuclear and the conventional fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Strengthening International Regimes for Arms Control and Disarmament”. Background Note prepared by the United Nations Department for Disarmament Affairs, New York, 19–20 October 2004.

  2. 2.

    Statement by Harold E. Stassen to the UN Disarmament Subcommittee, 6 September 1955. Documents on Disarmament 19451959, Vol. I. (Washington, DC: ACDA, 1960), p. 512.

  3. 3.

    For a detailed review of CBMs within the context of the Egyptian–Israeli Peace Treaty, see the text of the “Egyptian–Israeli Peace Treaty”, 1979; available at: http://www.mideastweb.org/egyptisraeltreaty.htm.

  4. 4.

    See the text of “The Helsinki Final Act”, 1975; available at: http://www.osce.org/mc/39501?download=true.

  5. 5.

    See text of “The Stockholm Document”, 1986; available at:http://www.osce.org/fsc/41238

  6. 6.

    Under START I, the two superpowers were obliged to cut the number of their strategic nuclear warheads to no more than 6,000 each, which could be deployed on no more than 1,600 strategic missiles and heavy bombers. The treaty also banned the production, testing and deployment of new or modified ICBMs and SLBMs with more than ten warheads, and provided for intrusive verification procedures.

References

  • Ahmar, M. (2001). Rationalizing the concept of confidence-building measures. In M. Ahmar (Ed.), The challenge of confidence-building in South Asia. Karachi: Paramount Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attina, F., & Attina, F. (2001). Partnership and security: Some theoretical and empirical reasons for positive developments in the euro-mediterranean area. In F. Attina & S. Stavridis (Eds.), The Barcelona process and euro-mediterranean issues from Stuttgart to Marseilles. Milano: Dott. A. Giuffre Editors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blacker, C. D., & Duffy, G. (1984). International arms control: Issues and agreements. California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, K. (1987). Disarmament and arms control. In J. Baylis, K. Booth, J. Garnett, & P. Williams (Eds.), Contemporary strategy I.: Theories and concepts. Teaneck, NJ: Holmes & Meier Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, M., & Williams, P. (1985). Helsinki and west European security. International Affairs, 61,4 (Autumn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, H. G. (2000). From confidence to partnership building measures in Europe and the mediterranean: Conceptual and political efforts revisited. In H. G. Brauch, A. Marquina, A. Biad, & P. Liotta (Eds.), Euro-mediterranean partnership for the 21st century. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, H. G. (2000a). Beyond Stuttgart: Prospects for confidence and partnership building measures in euro-mediterranean relations for the 21st century. In H. G. Brauch, A. Marquina, A. Biad, & P. Liotta (Eds.), Euro-mediterranean partnership for the 21st century. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, M., & Perdomo, C. (2005). CBMs in Latin America and the effect of arms acquisitions by Venezuela. Working Paper (WP) 41/2005, Real Instituto Elcano, 22 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, H. (1965). The control of the arms race: Disarmament and arms control in the missile age. New York: Fredeirck A. Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desjardins, M.-F. (1996). Rethinking confidence-building measures: Obstacles to agreement and the risks of overselling the process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, N. W. (1998). Bridging the gaps on arms control. In N. Gallagher (Ed.), Arms control: New approaches to theory and policy. New York: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, C. L. (1995). Realists as optimists: Cooperation and self-help. International Security, 19, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. (1992). House of cards: Why arms control must fail. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M., & O’Callaghan, T. (2002). International relations: The key concepts. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunduz, A. (1994). Security & Human Rights in Europe: The CECE process. Istanbul: University of Marmara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S, & Simmons, B. A. (1987). Theories of international regimes. International Organization, 41, 3 (Summer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. A. (2000). Weapons of mass destruction and Euro-Mediterranean policies of arms control: An Israeli perspective. In A. Vasconcelos & G. Joffe (Eds.), The Barcelona process: Building a Euro-Mediterranean regional community. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst, J., & Melander, K. (1977, July/August). European security and confidence-building measures. Survival.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst, J. (1987). A CBM regime in Europe: 19 interrelated propositions. In R. B. Byers, F. S. Larrabee, & A. Lynch (Eds.), Confidence-building measures and international security. New York: Institute for East–West Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. (1993). Arms control, stability, and causes of war. Political Science Quarterly, 108, 2 (Summer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, G. (1991). The control of the Middle East arms race. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, K. (1997). Cross-cultural dimensions of multilateral non-proliferation and arms control dialogues: An overview. In A. Latham (Ed.), Non-proliferation agreements, arrangements and responses: Proceedings of the 1996 Canadian non-proliferation workshop. Toronto: The York Center for International and Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J. A. (2002). An introduction to arms control. In J. A. Larsen (Ed.), Arms control: Cooperative security in a changing environment. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintosh, J. (1987). Confidence-building measures—a conceptual exploration. In R. B. Byers, F. S. Larrabee, & A. Lynch (Eds.), Confidence-building measures and international security. New York: Institute for East–West, Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macintosh, J. (1996). Confidence building in the arms control process: A transformation view. A study prepared for the Non-Proliferation, Arms Control and Disarmament Division Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (October).

    Google Scholar 

  • McFate, P. B. et al. (Eds.), (1994). The converging roles of arms control verification, confidence-building measures, and peace operations: opportunities for harmonization and synergies. A Study prepared for the Non-Proliferation, Arms Control and Disarmament Division of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Ottawa, Canada (October).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachmias, C. F., & Nachmias, D. (1992). Research methods in the social sciences. New York: St.Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, B. (1994). The United States and the Arab–Israeli peace process. In G. Ben-Dor & D. B. Dewitt (Eds.), Confidence building measures in the Middle East. San Francisco: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, V., Efinger, M., & Mendler, M. (1990, February). Toward an east–west security regime: The case of confidence-and security-building measures. Journal of Peace Research, 27, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C., & Halperin, M. H. (1985). Strategy and arms control. Washington, DC: Pergamon-Brassy’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, J. (2000, December). Arms control failure and the balance of power. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 33, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selltiz, C., Wrightsman, L. S., & Cook, S. W. (1976). Research methods in social relations. New York: Holt and Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (1978). Basic research methods in social science and the art of empirical investigation. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, G. M. (2004). The centrality of confidence-building measures: Lessons from the Middle East. In A. Schnabel & D. Carment (Eds.), Conflict prevention: From rhetoric to reality. Ottawa: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, F. (2000). The Euro-Mediterranean security partnership: Prospects for arms limitation and confidence-building. In A. Vasconcelos & G. Joffe (Eds.), The Barcelona process: Building a Euro-Mediterranean regional community. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, B. (1984). The alternative to arms control. Los Angeles: Center for International and Strategic Studies, University of California at Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gamal M. Selim .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Selim, G.M. (2013). Arms Control and Security Cooperation: Contending Approaches. In: Global and Regional Approaches to Arms Control in the Middle East. SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace(), vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29314-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics