Skip to main content

A Sound Decision Procedure for the Compositionality of Secrecy

  • Conference paper
Engineering Secure Software and Systems (ESSoS 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 7159))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The composition of processes is in general not secrecy preserving under the Dolev-Yao attacker model. In this paper, we describe an algorithmic decision procedure which determines whether the composition of secrecy preserving processes is still secrecy preserving. As a case-study we consider a variant of the TLS protocol where, even though the client and server considered separately would be viewed as preserving the secrecy of the data to be communicated, its composition to the complete protocol does not preserve that secrecy. We also show results on tool support that allows one to validate the efficiency of our algorithm for multiple compositions.

This research was partially supported by the MoDelSec Project of the DFG Priority Programme 1496 “Reliably Secure Software Systems – RS3” and the EU project NESSoS (FP7 256890).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abadi, M.: Security protocols and their properties. In: Bauer, F., Steinbrüggen, R. (eds.) 20th International Summer School on Foundations of Secure Computation, Marktoberdorf, Germany, pp. 39–60. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Apostolopoulos, G., Peris, V., Saha, D.: Transport layer security: How much does it really cost? In: Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom, pp. 717–725 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Armando, A., Carbone, R., Compagna, L., Cuéllar, J., Tobarra, M.L.: Formal analysis of SAML 2.0 web browser single sign-on: breaking the SAML-based single sign-on for google apps. In: Shmatikov, V. (ed.) FMSE, pp. 1–10. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broy, M.: A logical basis for component-based systems engineering. In: Calculational System Design. IOS Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, E.M., Long, D.E., Mcmillan, K.L.: Compositional model checking. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS 1989). IEEE Computer Society (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Datta, A., Derek, A., Mitchell, J.C., Roy, A.: Protocol composition logic (pcl). Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 172(0), 311–358 (2007); Computation, Meaning, and Logic: Articles dedicated to Gordon Plotkin

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Guttman, J.D.: Cryptographic Protocol Composition via the Authentication Tests. In: de Alfaro, L. (ed.) FOSSACS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5504, pp. 303–317. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Guttman, J.D., Javier, F., Fábrega, F.J.T.: Protocol independence through disjoint encryption. In: Proceedings 13th Computer Security Foundations Workshop, pp. 24–34. IEEE Computer Society Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jürjens, J.: Composability of Secrecy. In: Gorodetski, V.I., Skormin, V.A., Popyack, L.J. (eds.) MMM-ACNS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2052, pp. 28–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Jürjens, J.: A domain-specific language for cryptographic protocols based on streams. J. Log. Algebr. Program. 78(2), 54–73 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lowe, G.: Breaking and fixing the Needham-Schroeder public-key protocol using FDR. Software Concepts and Tools 17(3), 93–102 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meadows, C.: Open issues in formal methods for cryptographic protocol analysis. In: DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition (DISCEX 2000), pp. 237–250. IEEE Computer Society (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paulson, L.: The inductive approach to verifying cryptographic protocols. Journal of Computer Security 6(1-2), 85–128 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stoller, S.D.: A bound on attacks on authentication protocols. In: Proc. of the 2nd IFIP International Conference on Theoretical Computer Science: Foundations of Information Technology in the Era of Network and Mobile Computing (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Gilles Barthe Benjamin Livshits Riccardo Scandariato

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ochoa, M., Jürjens, J., Warzecha, D. (2012). A Sound Decision Procedure for the Compositionality of Secrecy. In: Barthe, G., Livshits, B., Scandariato, R. (eds) Engineering Secure Software and Systems. ESSoS 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7159. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28166-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28166-2_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28165-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28166-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics