Abstract
In this chapter the findings of five studies are reported. Two research instruments were used: the Mathematics and Technology Attitudes Scale (MTAS), and the Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics Scale (SATS). The aims, methods, data analyses, selected findings and conclusions are presented, as well as implications for the teaching and learning of mathematics and statistics. The studies involved samples from Australia and Greece. Findings from the three MTAS studies revealed that there is a complex nexus of relationships between secondary mathematics students’ mathematics confidence, confidence with technology, attitude to learning mathematics with technology, affective engagement and behavioural engagement, achievement, and gender. Findings from the SATS studies indicated that male Greek tertiary students had more positive attitudes toward statistics than female students; there was no gender gap for the Australian tertiary students. Secondary students’ attitudes towards ICT use for mathematics learning require further scrutiny in order to bring about gender equity and to facilitate improved outcomes for all students. Gender and cultural sensitivity are paramount in the instructional planning, decision making, and implementation of secondary mathematics and tertiary statistics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Araki, L. T., & Shultz, K. S. (1995, April). Student attitudes toward statistics and their retention of statistical concepts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Los Angeles.
Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7, 245–274.
Buck, J. L. (1985). A failure to find gender differences in statistics achievement. Teaching of Psychology, 12, 100.
Barkatsas, A. N. (2005). A new scale for monitoring students’ attitudes to learning mathematics with technology (MTAS). In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce & A. Roche (Eds.), Building connections: Theory, research and practice (Vol. 1, pp. 129–137). Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Group of Australasia. Melbourne: MERGA.
Barkatsas, A., Forgasz, H., & Leder, G. C. (2001). The gender stereotyping of mathematics: Cultural dimensions. In J. Bobis, B. Perry & M. Mitchelmore (Eds.), Numeracy and beyond. Sydney: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Barkatsas, A. N., Kasimatis, K., & Gialamas, V. (2009). Learning secondary mathematics with technology: Exploring the complex interrelationship between students’ attitudes, engagement, gender and achievement. Computers & Education, 52, 562–570.
Bechrakis, T., Gialamas, V., & Barkatsas, A. N. (2011). Survey of attitudes toward statistics (SATS): An investigation of its construct validity and its factor invariance by gender. International Journal of Theoretical Educational Practice, 1, 1–15.
Bennison, A., & Goos, M. (2010). Learning to teach mathematics with technology: A survey of professional development needs, experiences and impacts. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 2(1), 31–56.
Bradley, D. R., & Wygant, C. R. (1998). Male and female differences in anxiety about statistics are not reflected in performance. Psychological Reports, 80, 245–246.
Cashin, S. E., & Elmore, P. B. (2005). The survey of attitudes toward statistics scale: A construct validity study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 509–524.
Coakes, S. J., & Steed, L. G. (1999). SPSS: Analysis without anguish. Australia: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
Drijvers, P. (2000). Students encountering obstacles using CAS. The International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 5(3), 189–209.
Earp, M. S. (2007). Development and validation of the statistics anxiety measure. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Denver, USA.
Elmore, P. B., & Lewis, E. L. (1991, April). Statistics and computer attitudes and achievement of students enrolled in applied statistics: Effect of a computer laboratory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Elmore, P. B., Lewis, E. L., & Bay, M. L. G. (1993, April). Statistics achievement: A function of attitudes and related experiences. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
Elmore, P. B., & Vasu, E. S. (1986). A model of statistics achievement using spatial ability, feminist attitudes, and mathematics-related variables as predictors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 215–222.
Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1976). Fennema–Sherman mathematics attitudes scales. Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. Abstracted in the JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6(1), 31. (Ms No. 1225).
Forgasz, H., Leder, G. C., & Barkatsas, A. (1998). Mathematics—For boys? For girls? Vinculum, 35(3), 15–19.
Forgasz, H., Leder, G. C., & Barkatsas, A. N. (1999). Of course I can(’t) do mathematics: Ethnicity and the stereotyping of mathematics. In J. M. Truran & K. M. Truran (Eds.). Making the difference. Adelaide: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Forgasz, H. J., & Leder, G. C. (2001). A+ for girls, B for boys: Changing perspectives on gender equity and mathematics. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds). Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective (pp. 347–366). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Galbraith, P., & Haines, C. (1998). Disentangling the nexus: Attitudes to mathematics and technology in a computer learning environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 275–290.
Guin, D., & Trouche, L. (1999). The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments: The case of calculators. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 3, 195–227.
Harvey, A. L., Plake, B. S., & Wise, S. L. (1985, April). The validity of six beliefs about factors related to statistics achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Heid, M. K., & Edwards, M. T. (2001). Computer algebra systems: Revolution or retrofit for today’s mathematics classrooms? Theory and Practice, 40(2), 128–136.
Lebart, L., Morineau, A., Lambert, T., & Pleuvret, P. (2001). Manuel de référence de SPAD. Montreuil: CISIA-CERESTA.
Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 153–184.
Middleton, J. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalisations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 65–88.
McLeod, D. B. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualisation. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575–596). New York: MacMillan.
Newmann, F. M. (1989). Student engagement in high school mathematics. Educational Leadership, 46(5), 34–36.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (1995). Statistics test anxiety and female students. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 413–418.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–322.
Pierce, R., & Stacey, K. (2004). A framework for monitoring progress and planning teaching toward the effective use of computer algebra systems. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9, 59–93.
Pierce, R., Stacey, K., & Barkatsas, A. N. (2007). A scale for monitoring students’ attitudes to learning mathematics with technology. Computers and Education, 48(2), 285–300.
Reed, C. R., Drijvers, P., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Effects of attitudes on learning mathematics with computer tools. Computers and Education, 55(1), 1–15.
Roberts, D. M., & Bilderback, E. W. (1980). Reliability and validity of a statistics attitude survey. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 235–238.
Roberts, D. M., & Saxe, J. E. (1982). Validity of a statistics attitude survey: A follow-up study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 907–912.
Schau, C., Stevens, J., Dauphinee, T. L., & Del Vecchio, A. (1995). The development and validation of the survey of attitudes toward statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 868–875.
Schram, C. M. (1996). A meta-analysis of gender differences in applied statistics achievement. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21(1), 55–70.
Tanner, H., Jones, S., Beauchamp, G., & Kennewell, S. (2010). Interactive whiteboards and all that Jazz: Analysing classroom activity with interactive technologies. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of mathematics education: Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Fremantle: MERGA.
Vale, C., & Bartholomew, H. (2008). Gender and mathematics. In H. Forgasz, A. Barkatsas, A. Bishop, B. Clarke, S. Keast, W.-T. Seah, & P. Sullivan (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2004–7 (pp. 271–290). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Vale, C., & Leder, G. (2004). Student views of computer-based mathematics in the middle years: Does gender make a difference? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 287–312.
Ware, M. E., & Chastain, J. D. (1991). Developing selection skills in introductory statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 18(4), 219–222.
Waters, L. K., Martelli, T. A., Zakrajsek, T., & Popovich, P. M. (1988). Attitudes toward statistics: An evaluation of multiple measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 513–516.
Watt, H. M. G. (2006). The role of motivation in gendered educational and occupational trajectories related to maths. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 305–322.
Weglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton: Educational Testing Service Policy Information Center.
Wise, S. L. (1985). The development and validation of a scale measuring attitudes toward statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 401–405.
Zimmer, J. C., & Fuller, D. K. (1996). Factors affecting undergraduate performance in statistics: A review of the literature. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Tuscaloosa, AL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED406424.)
Zyngier, D. (2007). Listening to teachers-listening to students: Substantive conversations about resistance, empowerment and engagement. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(4), 327–347.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Mathematics and Technology Attitudes Scale
Five Subscales
Mathematics Confidence [MC], Confidence with Technology [TC], Attitude to learning mathematics with technology [MT], Affective Engagement [AE] and Behavioural Engagement [BE].
To tailor to a particular class, change the words “graphics calculators” to the technology used by that class (e.g. computers, graphing calculators, computer algebra systems).
Appendix 2: Factor Structure of the MTAS Scale
Subscales
Mathematics Confidence [MC], Confidence with Technology [TC], Attitude to learning mathematics with technology [MT], Affective Engagement [AE] and Behavioural Engagement [BE].
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barkatsas, A.N. (2012). Students’ Attitudes, Engagement and Confidence in Mathematics and Statistics Learning: ICT, Gender, and Equity Dimensions. In: Forgasz, H., Rivera, F. (eds) Towards Equity in Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27702-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27702-3_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27701-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27702-3
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)