Skip to main content

How to Treat Failures Related to Articulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Wear is the major reason of late failure of THA. Progressive osteolysis can produce loss of bone, implant failure, and difficulties in revision due to bone deficiency. This is the reason why the best “treatment” is to prevent failures related to articulation by employing low wear bearing surfaces and monitoring the patients. Troubles with materials teach that there is not an ideal solution for every case in THA and that the surgeon must select the proper tribology for each patient. The correct component position and orientation is critical for each coupling. A proper surgical technique and implant position remain crucial. Early revision improving the tribology can prevent catastrophic complications such as major bone loss or loosening. Major unnecessary surgery should be avoided and only the failed components should be revised. Malposition must be corrected. The center of rotation, off-set and bone stock should be restored whenever possible. Different options and how to face different situations in case of revision are analyzed in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allain J, Roudot-Thoraval F, Delecrin J, Anract P, Migaud H, Goutallier D (2003) Revision total hip arthroplasty performed after fracture of a ceramic femoral head. A multicenter survivorship study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(5):825–830

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC (2007) Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):735–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Browne JA, Bechtold CD, Berry DJ, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG (2010) Failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a spectrum of clinical presentations and operative findings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(9):2313–2320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Clayton RA, Beggs I, Salter DM, Grant MH, Patton JT, Porter DE (2008) Inflammatory pseudotumor associated with femoral nerve palsy following metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(9):1988–1993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dalla Pria P, Zagra L, Esopi P, Masoni D (2010) Breakage and noises in ceramic on ceramic couplings. Eur Orthop Traumatol 1:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Emms NW, Stockley I, Hamer AJ, Wilkinson JM (2010) Long-term outcome of a cementless, hemispherical, press-fit acetabular component: survivorship analysis and dose–response relationship to linear polyethylene wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(6):856–861

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Girard J, Bocquet D, Autissier G, Fouilleron N, Fron D, Migaud H (2010) Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty in patients thirty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(14):2419–2426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gozzini GA, Schmid C, Dalla Pria P (2002) Massive wear in CoCrMo head following the fracture of an alumina head. Hip Int 12:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Kwon Y-M, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Gill HS (2009) Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumor have a poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91-B:1019–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huo MH, Brown BS (2003) What’s new in hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(9):1852–1864

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobs CA, Christensen CP, Greenwald AS, McKellop H (2007) Clinical performance of highly cross-linked polyethylenes in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(12):2779–2786

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kempf I, Semlitsch M (1990) Massive wear of a steel ball head by ceramic fragments in the polyethylene acetabular cup after revision of a total hip prosthesis with fractured ceramic ball. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 109(5):284–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Khanuja HS, Aggarwal A, Hungerford MW, Hungerford DS, Jones LC, Mont MA (2010) Cementing polyethylene liners into non-modular acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg 18(2):184–188

    Google Scholar 

  14. Learmonth ID (2003) Biocompatibility: a biomechanical and biological concept in total hip replacement. Surgeon 1(1):1–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee SC, Jung KA, Nam CH, Kim TH, Ahn NK, Hwang SH (2010) Acetabular screw head-induced ceramic acetabular liner fracture in cementless ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 33(5). doi:10.3928/01477447-20100329-30

  16. Leslie IJ, Williams S, Isaac G, Ingham E, Fisher J (2009) High cup angle and microseparation increase the wear of hip surface replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(9):2259–2265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lieberman JR, Moeckel BH, Evans BG, Salvati EA, Ranawat CS (1993) Cement-within-cement revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 75 B:869–871

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lusty PJ, Watson A, Tuke MA, Walter WL, Walter WK, Zicat B (2007) Wear and acetabular component orientation in third generation alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings: an analysis of 33 retrievals [corrected]. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(9):1158–1164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mäkelä KT, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Paavolainen P, Remes V (2011) Results of 3,668 primary total hip replacements for primary osteoarthritis in patients under the age of 55 years. Acta Orthop 82(5):521–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Matziolis G, Perka C, Disch A (2003) Massive metallosis after revision of a fractured ceramic head onto a metal head. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123(1):48–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McKellop HA, Campbell P, Park SH, Schmalzried TP, Grigoris P, Amstutz HC, Sarmiento A (1995) The origin of submicron polyethylene wear debris in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 311:3–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McKellop HA, Shen FW, Lu B, Campbell P, Salovey R (2000) Effect of sterilization method and other modifications on the wear resistance of acetabular cups made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. A hip-simulator study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A(12):1708–1725

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mueller LA, Voelk M, Kress A, Pitto RP, Schmidt R (2007) An ABJS best paper: progressive cancellous and cortical bone remodeling after press-fit cup fixation: a 3-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 463:213–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Murray DW, Grammatopoulos G, Gundle R, Gibbons CL, Whitwell D, Taylor A, Glyn-Jones S, Pandit HG, Ostlere S, Gill HS, Athanasou N, McLardy-Smith P (2011) Hip resurfacing and pseudotumour. Hip Int 21(3):279–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Onda K, Nagoya S, Kaya M, Yamashita T (2008) Cup-neck impingement due to the malposition of the implant as a possible mechanism for metallosis in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 31(4):396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pitto RP, Bhargava A, Pandit S, Walker C, Munro JT (2008) Quantitative CT-assisted osteodensitometry of femoral adaptive bone remodelling after uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32(5):589–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Saito S, Ishii T, Mori S, Hosaka K, Ootaki M, Tokuhashi Y (2010) Long-term results of metasul metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 11;3(8):3

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sharma V, Ranawat AS, Rasquinha VJ, Weiskopf J, Howard H, Ranawat CS (2010) Revision total hip arthroplasty for ceramic head fracture: a long-term follow-up. J Arthroplasty 25(3):342–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tower SS, Currier JH, Currier BH, Lyford KA, Van Citters DW, Mayor MB (2007) Rim cracking of the cross-linked longevity polyethylene acetabular liner after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(10):2212–2217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Traina F, Tassinari E, De Fine M, Bordini B, Toni A (2011) Revision of a ceramic hip for fractured ceramic components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(24):1471–1479.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Willert HG (2005) Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(1):28–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Willert HG, Bertram H, Buchhorn GH (1990) Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip. The role of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 258:95–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Young J, Vallamshetla VR, Lawrence T (2008) The polished tri-tapered stem for cement-in-cement revision hip arthroplasty, a reliable and reproducible technique? Hip Int 18(4):272–277

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luigi Zagra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 EFORT

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zagra, L., Bianchi, L., Ceroni, R.G. (2012). How to Treat Failures Related to Articulation. In: Knahr, K. (eds) Total Hip Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27361-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27361-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27360-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27361-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics