Skip to main content

The Many Forms of Process Improvement – Results of an International Survey

  • Conference paper
Software Quality. Process Automation in Software Development (SWQD 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 94))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

When discussing process improvement, different authors assign different goals of improvement and describe different methods of improvement. Several process improvement methods and theories of organizational performance are examined to reveal how each might give rise to different concepts and concerns of process improvement. There is little empirical information available to support or refute such expectations about improvements made to software development processes, whether through formal process improvement initiatives or through responses to changes in the development environment. In the absence of such information those involved in process improvement, from standards development through to consultants and those who implement process improvement projects, risk making poor decisions about what changes should be made to the processes. A project to develop and run an international survey was conducted by a number of researchers from different parts of the world to understand various forms of process improvements, their goals and motivations. The result of the study indicates that the motivations for process improvement are not matched by the improvement goals that are themselves not achieved by the implemented improvements. The study also contradicted commonly cited beliefs that process improvement changes are seldom reviewed, are seldom permanent and can make the situation worse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clark, B.K.: The Effects of Software Process Maturity on Software Development Effort. Faculty of the Graduate School, University of Southern California, San Diego, p. 140 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goldenson, D.R., Gibson, D.L.: Demonstrating the Impact and Benefits of CMMI: An Update and Preliminary Results. Software Engineering Institute (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldenson, D.R., Herbsleb, J.D.: After the Appraisal: A Systematic Survey of Process Improvement, its Benefits, and Factors that Influence Success. Software Engineering Institute (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Herbsleb, J.D., Goldenson, D.R.: A systematic survey of CMM experience and results. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Software Engineering 1996, pp. 323–330 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Humphrey, W.S.: A Discipline for Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gilb, T.: Principles of Software Engineering Management. Addison-Wesley (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boehm, B., Clark, B., Horowitz, E., Madachy, R., Selby, R., Westland, C.: An Overview of the Cocomo 2.0 Software Cost Model. In: Software Technology Conference, p. 21 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. ISO/IEC 9001: Quality Management Systems - Requirements. 9001 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. ISO/IEC 15504-2: Software Engineering - Process Assessment - Part 2: Performing An Assessment. 15504, vol. 2 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schroeder, R.G., Linderman, K., Liedtke, C., Choo, A.S.: Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory. Journal of Operations Management 26, 536–554 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. SEI: CMMI® for Development, Version 1.3. Software Engineering Institute (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Middleton, P.: Lean Software Development: Two Case Studies. Software Quality Journal 9, 241 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T., Roos, D.: The Machine that Changed the World. Rawson Associates, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rummler, G.A., Ramias, A.J., Rummler, R.A.: White Space Revisited: Creating Value Through Process. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. ISO/IEC 12207: Information technology – Software life cycle processes. 12207 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baddoo, N., Hall, T.: Motivators of Software Process Improvement: an analysis of practitioners’ views. The Journal of Systems and Software 62, 85–96 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoverstadt, P.: The Fractal Organization: Creating sustainable organizations with the Viable System Model. Wiley (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cockburn, A.: Agile Software Development: The Cooperative Game, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cohn, M.: Succeeding with Agile: Software Development using Scrum. Addison-Wesley (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. ISO/IEC 15504-1: Information Technology - Process Assessment - Part 1: Concepts and Vocabulary. 15504, vol. 1 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Salo, O., Abrahamsson, P.: Integrating Agile Software Development and Software Process Improvement: A Longitudinal Study. ISESE, Noosa Heads (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Paulk, M.C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M.B., Webber, C.V.: Capability Maturity Model for Software. Software Engineering Institute (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ferdows, K., De Meyer, A.: Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: In search of a new theory. Journal of Operations Management 9, 168–184 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Flynn, B.B., Flynn, E.J.: An exploratory study of the nature of cumulative capabilities. Journal of Operations Management 22, 439–457 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schmenner, R.W.: Service Businesses and Productivity. Decision Sciences 35, 333–347 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmenner, R.W.: Looking ahead by looking back: Swift Even Flow in the history of manufacturing. Production and Operations Management 10, 87–96 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sterman, J., Kofman, F., Repenning, N.: Unanticipated Side Effects of Successful Quality Programs: Exploring a Paradox of Organizational Improvement. Management Science 43 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lepasaar, M., Varkoi, T., Jaakkola, H.: Models and Success Factors of Process Change. In: Bomarius, F., Komi-Sirviö, S. (eds.) PROFES 2001. LNCS, vol. 2188, pp. 68–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Deming, W.E.: Out of the Crisis. The MIT Press (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gray, E.M., Smith, W.L.: On the limitations of software process assessment and the recognition of a required re-orientation for global process improvement. Software Quality Journal 7, 21–34 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Davenport, T.H.: Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Brown, S.L., Eisenhardt, K.M.: The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations. Administration Science Quarterly 42, 1–34 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Curtis, B., Kellner, M.I., Over, J.: Process Modeling. Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM 35, 75–90 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lepmets, M., Ras, E.: Motivation and Empowerment in Process Improvement. In: O‘Connor, R.V., Pries-Heje, J., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2011. CCIS, vol. 172, pp. 109–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Brown, J.S., Duguid, P.: Creativity Versus Structure: A Useful Tension. MIT Sloan Management Review 42, 93–94 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hillmer, S., Karney, D.: In support of the assumptions at the foundation of Deming’s management theory. Journal of Quality Management 6, 371–400 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. McBride, T., Henderson-Sellers, B., Zowghi, D.: Software development as a design or a production project; An empirical study of project monitoring and control. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 20, 70 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Weick, K.: Managing the Unexpected: Complexity as Distributed Sensemaking. In: McDaniel, R., Driebe, D. (eds.) Uncertainty and Surprise in Complex Systems, vol. 4, pp. 51–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

McBride, T., Lepmets, M. (2012). The Many Forms of Process Improvement – Results of an International Survey. In: Biffl, S., Winkler, D., Bergsmann, J. (eds) Software Quality. Process Automation in Software Development. SWQD 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 94. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27213-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27213-4_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27212-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27213-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics