Abstract
In Chap. 13, we focus on hierarchical Bayesian modeling of dose-response microarray data. The materials presented in the first part of the chapter are closely related to the classification procedure discussed in Chap. 10 in the sense that we fit several order-restricted models for each gene. However, in contrast with Chap. 10, we do not aim to select the model with the best goodness-of-fit but to test the null hypothesis of no dose effect. We formulate order-restricted hierarchical Bayesian model for dose-response data and present gene specific examples to illustrate the estimation procedures. Within the hierarchical Bayesian framework one of the major challenges is related to the question of how to perform Bayesian inference and in particular how to adjust for multiplicity. We discuss the Bayesian variable selection (BVS) method (O‘Hara et al., Bayesian Anal 4(1):85–118, 2009) which we use in order to calculate the posterior probability of a specific model given the data and the model parameters. Following Newton et al. (Biostatistics 5(2):155–176, 2004; Hierarchical mixture models for expression profiles. In Do KM, Muller P, Vannucci M (eds) Bayesian Inference for gene expression and proteomics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007), we use the posterior probability of the null model to control for multiplicity using the direct posterior probability method for multiplicity adjustment.
Keywords
- Posterior Probability
- Null Model
- Order Restriction
- Hierarchical Bayesian Model
- Markov Chain Monte Carlo Simulation
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Broet, P., Lewin, A., Richardson, S., Dalmasso, C., & Magdelenat, H. (2004). A mixture model based strategy for selecting sets of genes in multiclass response microarray experiments. Bioinformatics, 20(16), 2562–2571.
Chen, M. H., & Kim, S. (2008). The Bayes factor versus other model selection criteria for the selection of constrained models. In H. Hoijtink, I. Klugkist, & P. Boelen (Eds.), Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses. Berlin: Springer.
Dellaportas, P., Forster, J. J., & Ntzouras, I. (2002). On Bayesian model and variable selection using MCMC. Statistics and Computing, 12, 27–36.
Dunson, D. B., & Neelon, B. (2003). Bayesian inference on order constrained parameters in generalized linear models. Biometrics, 59, 286–295.
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis (2nd ed). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
George, E. I., & McCulloch, R. E. (1993). Variable selection via gibbs sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 881–889.
Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (1996) Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. London: Chapman & Hall.
Gelfand, A. E., Smith, A. F. M., & Lee, T.-M. (1992). Bayesian analysis of constrained parameter and truncated data problems. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 523–532.
Hoijtink, H., Klugkist, I., & Boelen, P. (Eds.). (2008). Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses. Berlin: Springer.
Kato, B. S., & Hoijtink, H. (2006). A bayesian approach to inequality constrained linear mixed models: estimation and model selection. Statistical Modelling, 6, 231–249.
Klugkist, I., Kato, B., & Hoijtink, H. (2005a) Bayesian model selection using en- compassing priors. Statistica Neerlandica, 59(1), 57–69.
Klugkist, I., Laudy, O., & Hoijtink, H. (2005b) Inequality constrained analysis of variance: A bayesian approach. Pyschological Methods, 10(4), 477–493.
Klugkist, I., & Mulder, J. (2008). Bayesian estimation for inequality constrained analysis of variance. In H. Hoijtink, I. Klugkist, & P. Boelen (Eds.), Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses. Berlin: Springer.
Lewin, A., Bochkina, N., & Richardson, S. (2007). Fully bayesian mixture model for differential gene expression: simulations and model checks. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 6(1). Article 36.
Myung, J. I., Karabatsos, G., & Iverson, G. J. (2008). A statistician’s view on Bayesuan evaluation of informative hypotheses. In H. Hoijtink, I. Klugkist, , & P. Boelen (Eds.), Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses. Berlin: Springer.
Newton, M. A., Noueiry, D., Sarkar, D., & Ahlquist, P. (2004). Detecting differential gene expression with a semi-parametric hierarchical mixture method. Biostatistics, 5(2), 155–176.
Newton, M. A., Wang, P., & Kendziorski, C. (2007). Hierarchical mixture models for expression profiles. In K. M. Do, P. Muller, & M. Vannucci (Eds.), Bayesian Inference for gene expression and proteomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ntzoufras, I. (2002). Gibbs variable selection using BUGS. Journal of Statistical Software, 7(7), 1–19.
Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Statistical Methodology) 64(4), 583–639.
O‘Hara, R. B., & Sillanpaa, M. J. (2009). A review of Bayesian variable selection methods: what, how and which. Bayesian Analysis, 4(1), 85–118.
Whitney, M., & Ryan, L. (2009). Quantifying dose-response uncertainty using bayesian model averaging. In R. M. Cooke (Ed.), Uncertainty modeling in dose-response. New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kasim, A., Shkedy, Z., Kato, B.S. (2012). Estimation and Inference Under Simple Order Restrictions: Hierarchical Bayesian Approach. In: Lin, D., Shkedy, Z., Yekutieli, D., Amaratunga, D., Bijnens, L. (eds) Modeling Dose-Response Microarray Data in Early Drug Development Experiments Using R. Use R!. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24007-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24007-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24006-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24007-2
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)