Skip to main content
  • 808 Accesses

Abstract

Patients may become more informed about the choices that go into making optimal clinical decisions for their own personal health care. The model also provides for visual images to be used in discussing their personal choices when considering different treatment options and clinical scenarios. The calculations accomplished through the model provide trade-off analyses by which discussions may be facilitated between provider and patient in reaching informed consent and optimal clinical decisions in formulating treatment plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pell I, Dowie J, Clarke A, Kennedy A, Bhavnani V (2002) Development and preliminary evaluation of a clinical guidance programme for the decision about prophylactic oophorectomy in women undergoing a hysterectomy. Qual Saf Health Care 11:32–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bauer J (2006) Process of evidence-based dental decision-making. US Patent 60/757,647, 9 Jan 2006. For: Methods of producing evidence-based decision

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer JG, Spackman S, Edwards W (2009) The clinical decision tree of oral health in geriatrics. In: Weis JW, Weiss DJ (eds) A science of decision making, the legacy of Ward Edwards. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 461–475

    Google Scholar 

  4. Miyamoto JM, Wakker PP, Bleichrodt H, Peters HJM (1998) The zero condition: a simplifying assumption in QALY measurement and multiattribute utility. Manage Sci 44(6):839–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Miyamoto JM (2003) Utility assessment under expected utility and rank dependent utility assumptions. In: Chapman GB, Sonnenberg F (eds) Decision making in health care: theory, psychology, and application. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 65–109

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miyamoto JM, Eraker SA (1989) Parametric models of the utility of survival duration: tests of axioms in a generic utility framework. Organ Behav Hum Dec 44:166–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janet G. Bauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bauer, J.G. (2012). Probability–Utility Model for Evidence-Based Decision-Making. In: Chiappelli, F. (eds) Comparative Effectiveness and Efficacy Research and Analysis for Practice (CEERAP). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23144-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23144-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23143-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23144-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics