Skip to main content

Collecting Semantic Similarity Ratings to Connect Concepts in Assistive Communication Tools

  • Chapter
Book cover Modeling, Learning, and Processing of Text Technological Data Structures

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 370))

Abstract

To compensate for the common inability of people with lexical production impairments to access and express intended concepts, we make use of models of human semantic memory that build on the notion of semantic similarity and relatedness. Such models, constructed on evidence gained from psycholinguistic experiments, form the basis of a large lexical database, WordNet. We augment WordNet with many additional links among words and concepts that are semantically related. Making this densely connected semantic network available to people with anomic aphasia through assistive technologies should enable them to navigate among related words and concepts and retrieve the words that they intend to express.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, M., McGrenere, J., Purves, B.: The design and field evaluation of phototalk: a digital image communication application for people. In: Assets 2007: Proceedings of the 9th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 187–194. ACM, New York (2007), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1296843.1296876

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Amazoncom, Inc., Amazon mechanical turk (2010), https://www.mturk.com (last accessed December 8, 2010)

  3. Beukelman, D.R., Mirenda, P.: Augmentative and alternative Communication: Management of Severe Communication Disorders in Children and Adults. Brookes Publishing Company, Leiden (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd-Graber, J., Fellbaum, C., Osherson, D., Schapire, R.: Adding dense, weighted, connections to WordNet. In: Sojka, P., Choi, K.S., Fellbaum, C., Vossen, P. (eds.) Proc. Global WordNet Conference 2006, Global WordNet Association, Masaryk University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic, pp. 29–35 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd-Graber, J.L., Nikolova, S.S., Moffatt, K.A., Kin, K.C., Lee, J.Y., Mackey, L.W., Tremaine, M.M., Klawe, M.M.: Participatory design with proxies: Developing a desktop-PDA system to support people with aphasia. In: Proc. CHI 2006, pp. 151–160. ACM Press, New York (2006), doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1124772.1124797

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carmien, S.: MAPS: PDA scaffolding for independence for persons with cognitive impairments. In: Human-Computer Interaction Consortium (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Collins, A.M., Loftus, E.F.: A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 82(6), 407–428 (1975), http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayRecord&uid=1976-03421-001

    Google Scholar 

  8. Daeman, E., Dadlani, P., Du, J., Li, Y., Erik-Paker, P., Martens, J., Ruyter, B.D.: Designing a free style, indirect, and interactive storytelling application for people with aphasia. In: INTERACT, pp. 221–234 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dynavox, M.-J.: Dynavox, http://www.dynavoxtech.com/ (last accessed Dec 08, 2010)

  10. Fellbaum, C.: A semantic network of English verbs. In: Fellbaum, C. (ed.) WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haigh, K., Kiff, L., Ho, G.: The Independent LifeStyle AssistantTM (I.L.S.A.): Lessons Learned. Assistive Technology 18, 87–106 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang, J.J., Conrath, D.W.: Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. In: Proceedings on International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics, Taiwan (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Levinson, R.: PEAT: The planning and execution assistant and trainer. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 12(2), 769–775 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lingraphicare Inc. Lingraphica, http://www.aphasia.com/ (last accessed December 8, 2010)

  15. Miller, G.A.: Nouns in WordNet: A lexical inheritance system. International Journal of Lexicography 3(4), 245–264 (1990), http://ijl.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/3/4/245.pdf ; doi: 10.1093/ijl/3.4.245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moffatt, K., McGrenere, J., Purves, B., Klawe, M.: The participatory design of a sound and image enhanced daily planner for people with aphasia. In: Proc. CHI 2004, pp. 407–414. ACM Press, New York (2004), doi: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985692.985744

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moss, H., Older, L.: Birkbeck Word Association Norms. Psychology Press, San Diego (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pollack, M.E., Brown, L., Colbry, D., McCarthy, C.E., Orosz, C., Peintner, B., Ramakrishnan, S., Tsamardinos, I.: Autominder: An intelligent cognitive orthotic system for people with memory impairment. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 44(3-4), 273–282 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. van de Sandt-Koenderman, M.M., Wiegers, J., Hardy, P.: A computerised communication aid for people with aphasia. Disability Rehabilitation 27(9), 529–533 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schapire, R.E.: The boosting approach to machine learning: An overview. In: Denison, D.D., Hansen, M.H., Holmes, C., Mallick, B., Yu, B. (eds.) Nonlinear Estimation and Classification. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. O’Connor, S.R., Jurafsky D, Ng A (2008), Cheap and fast—but is it good? evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. Proceedings of EMNLP 2008, http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/D/D08/D08-1027.pdf

  22. Swinney, D.: Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 645–659 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. The National Aphasia Association Aphasia: The facts, http://www.aphasia.org (last accessed December 8, 2010)

  24. University of Oxford, British National Corpus (2006), http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/ , http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nikolova, S., Boyd-Graber, J., Fellbaum, C. (2011). Collecting Semantic Similarity Ratings to Connect Concepts in Assistive Communication Tools. In: Mehler, A., Kühnberger, KU., Lobin, H., Lüngen, H., Storrer, A., Witt, A. (eds) Modeling, Learning, and Processing of Text Technological Data Structures. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 370. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22613-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22613-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22612-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22613-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics