Skip to main content

Web 2.0 Divide among Naughty Insiders, Worried Outsiders, and Invisible Monitors: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • 1719 Accesses

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 177))

Abstract

Through focus group interview, this paper carried out a case study in a secondary school in Hong Kong on the use of Web 2.0 technologies among students, parents, and teachers. Findings suggest that there was no divide in terms of access and usage but a divide of web 2.0 technologies use among them. In conclusion, our research team speculated the roles that all these stakeholders were playing and attempted to describe them as: naughty insiders, worried outsiders, and invisible monitors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kuiper, E., Volman, M., Terwel, J.: The Web as an Information Resource in K–12 Education: Strategies for supporting Students in Searching and Processing Information. Review of Educational Research 75(3), 285–328 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schuck, S., Aubusson, P., Kearney, M.: Web 2.0 in the Classroom? Dilemmas and Opportunities Inherent in Adolescent Web 2.0 Engagement. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 10(2), 234–246 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Luckin, R., Clark, W., Graber, R., Logan, K., Mee, A., Oliver, M.: Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11-16 year-old students. Learning, Media and Technology 34(2), 87–104 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giacquinta, J.B., Bauer, J.A., Levin, J.E.: Beyond technology’s promise: examination of children’s educational computing at home. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Livingstone, S., Bober, M.: UK Children online: final report of key project findings, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/399/

  6. Vekiri, I.: Socioeconomic differences in elementary students’ ICT beliefs and out-of-school experiences. Computers & Education 54, 941–950 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson, P.: What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch, 1–64 (February 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson, J.: Is Education 1.0 Ready for Web 2.0 Students, http://www.innovateonline.info/http://innovateonline.info/index.php?view=article&id=393

  9. Prensky, M.: Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon 9(5), 1–6 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wikipedia Web 2.0. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0

  11. Johnson, M.J.: Primary source teaching the Web 2.0 way K-12. Linworth Books, Columbus (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lovejoy, F.: Digital Divide between Students and Teachers, http://www.classroom20.com/forum/topics/digital-divide-between

  13. Meyer, K.A.: A comparison of Web 2.0 tools in a doctoral course. Internet and Higher Education 13, 226–232 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Trinidad, S., Broadley, T.: Using Web2.0 Applications to Close the Digital Divide in Western Australia. Education in Rural Australia 18(1), 3–11 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rudd, P., Walker, M.: Children and young people’s Views on Web 2.0 Technologies. NFER, Slough (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tien, F.F., Fu, T.-T.: The correlates of the digital divide and their impact on college student learning. Computers & Education 50(1), 421–436 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Attewell, P., Battle, J.: Home computers and school performance. The Information Society 15(1), 1–10 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Angus, L., Snyder, I., Sutherland-Smith, W.: ICT and Educational (Dis) Advantage: Families, Computers and Contemporary Social and Educational Inequalities. British Journal of Sociology of Education 25(1), 3–18 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao, S.: Parental education and children’s online health information seeking: Beyond the digital divide debate. Social Science & Medicine 69(10), 1501–1505 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferrer, F., Belvís, E., Pàmies, J.: Tablet PCs, academic results and educational inequalities. Computers & Education 56, 280–288 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hohlfeld, T.N., Ritzhaupt, A.D., Barron, A.E.: Connecting schools, community, and family with ICT: Four-year trends related to school level and SES of public schools in Florida. Computers & Education 55(1), 391–405 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhong, Z.-J.: From access to usage: The divide of self-reported digital skills among adolescents. Computers & Education, 1–11 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lawless, K.A., Pellegrino, J.W.: Professional Development in Integrating Technology Into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers. Review of Educational Research 77(4), 575–614 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yuen, A., Law, N., Lee, M.W., Lee, Y.: The Changing Face of Education in Hong Kong: Transition into 21st Century. Hong Kong: Centre for Information Technology in Education, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Oliver, K.: Integrating Web 2.0 Across the Curriculum. Techtrends 54(2), 50–61 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review 14(4), 532–550 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vaughn, S., Schumm, J.S., Sinagub, J.: Focus Group Interviews in Education and Psychology. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Owen, S.: The practical, methodological and ethical dilemmas of conducting focus groups with vulnerable clients. Journal of Advanced Nursing 36(5), 652–658 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Esposito, N.: From Meaning to Meaning: The Influence of Translation Techniques on Non-English Focus Group Research. Qualitative Health Research 11(4), 568–579 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Law, N., Chow, A.: Pedagogical Orientations in Mathematics and Science and the Use of ICT. In: Law, N., Pelgrum&, W.J., Plomp, T. (eds.) Pedagogy and ICT Use in Schools around the World, pp. 121–179 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yu, M., Yuen, A.H.K., Park, J., Lam, H.C., Lau, K.K., Lau, W. (2011). Web 2.0 Divide among Naughty Insiders, Worried Outsiders, and Invisible Monitors: A Case Study. In: Kwan, R., McNaught, C., Tsang, P., Wang, F.L., Li, K.C. (eds) Enhancing Learning Through Technology. Education Unplugged: Mobile Technologies and Web 2.0. ICT 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 177. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22383-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22383-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22382-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22383-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics