Skip to main content

Is Engagement in CSR Motivated by the Defined Values of Entrepreneurs?

An Analysis of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enabling Responsible Living

Abstract

Companies have a high impact on responsible living while caring for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Entrepreneurs engaged in CSR often claim that they act on the basis of ethical values, namely through value orientations such as “Universalism” and “Benevolence”. In this investigation, the value orientations of the entrepreneurs, managing and owning small or mediums sized enterprises (SMEs), have been measured with the Schwartz Values Survey and have been related to their engagement, e.g., for the environment and their employees. The results are: Greater engagement for the environment and employees is correlated with greater “Universalism” and “Benevolence”. Unexpected positive correlations were found between the values “Security”, “Tradition”, “Stimulation” and “Engagement to Employees” respectively “Engagement to the Environment”. No correlations were found in the categories “Achievement” or “Power”. CSR finally does correlate with some desirable results of the companies, such as profit or a reduction in customer complaints. Therefore, CSR should be of strategic relevance to the entrepreneurs of SMEs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Assländer, M., & Löhr, A. (2010). Einführung: Zum Klärungsbedarf der Modevokabel “Corporate Social Responsibility”. In M. Assländer & A. Löhr (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in der Wirtschaftskrise (pp. 11–32). München: Rainer-Hampp-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsmann Stiftung. (2007). Die gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen: Dokumentation der Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensbefragung der Bertelsmann Stiftung. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from http://www.bertelsmannstiftung.de/cps/rde/xchg/bst/hs.xsl/suche.htm?innerRequest=trueandsuchbegriff=shareholder

  • Braun, S. (2010). Zwischen nationalen Traditionen und globalen Herausforderungen: Gesellschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen in der sozialen Marktwirtschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In S. Braun (Ed.), Gesellschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen: Der deutsche Weg im internationalen Kontext (pp. 85–105). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (2008). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. In A. Crane, D. Matten, & L. Spence (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in a global context (pp. 60–76). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A., & Buchholtz, A. (2002). Business and society. Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati: Thomson South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dannenbring, J. (2010). Gesellschaftliches Engagement im Handwerk im Spannungsfeld zwischen Förderung und Regulierung. In M. Assländer & A. Löhr (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in der Wirtschaftskrise (pp. 247–265). München: Rainer-Hampp-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2001). Corporate social responsibility green paper, promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2001:0366:FIN:en:PDF

  • European Commission. (2002). European SMEs and the social and environmental responsibility. Observatory of the European SMEs 2002/No 4. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/files/analysis/doc/smes_observatory_2002_report4_en.pdf

  • European Commission. (2003a). DG enterprise and industry, responsible entrepreneurship: A collection of good practice cases among small and medium-sized enterprises across Europe. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/114199/Responsible%20Entrepreneurship%20EU%202003.pdf

  • European Commission. (2003b). Commission recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:124:0036:0041:en:PDF

  • European Commission. Awareness-raising questionnaire. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/files/csr/campaign/documentation/download/questionaire_en.pdf

  • Gilde GmbH. (2007). Commitment to society by small and medium sized enterprises in Germany: Current situations and future development. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from http://www.csr-mittelstand.de/pdf/Studie_CSR_im_Mittelstand_Deutschland_EN.pdf

  • Hofmann, M., & Maaß, F. (2008). Corporate social responsibility als Erfolgsfaktor einer stakeholderbezogenen Führungsstrategie? Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung. In Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (Ed.), Jahrbuch zur Mittelstandsforschung (pp.1–51). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, J., Goodman, M., Alexander, J., & Genest, C. (2001). Reputation management: The new face of corporate public relations? Public Relations, 27, 247–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFM Bonn (Institut für Mittelstandsforschung Bonn) (Ed.). (2007). Die volkswirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Familienunternehmen. Gutachten im Auftrag der Stiftung Familienunternehmen. IfM-Materialien Nr. 172. Bonn:IFM Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keh, T. K., & Xie, Y. (2009). Corporate reputation and customer behavioral intentions: The roles of trust, identification and commitment. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 732–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laumen, S., Eigenstetter, M., & Packebusch, L. (2012). Evaluation des Modellvorhabens zur Optimierung der Produktionsabläufe und des Warentransports in KMU unter Verwendung integrativer Lösungsansätze zur Erhöhung der Gesundheit bei der Arbeit (ProWare).Abschlussbericht. Krefeld, Mönchengladbach: University of Applied Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisinger, K. M. (2003). Opportunities and risks of the United Nations Global Compact. The Novartis case study. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 11, 113–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maaß, F. (2010). Strategischer Einsatz von corporate citizenship im deutschen Mittelstand. In S. Braun (Ed.), Gesellschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen. Der deutsche Weg im internationalen Kontext.(pp. 260–271). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacGregor, S., & Fontrodoan, J. (2008). Exploring the fit between CSR and innovation.IESE business school working paper No. 759. Navarra, Spain: University of Navarra. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1269334

  • Mendoca, M., & Kanungo, R. (2007). Ethical leadership. Maidenhead, London: Mc Graw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldaschl, M. (2004). Partizipation und/als/statt Demokratie. In W. Weber, P- P. Pasqualoni & C. Burtscher (Eds), Wirtschaft, Demokratie und soziale Verantwortung (pp. 216–245). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response biases. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1964). The social system. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: Civic disengagement in America. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Pdsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreck, P. (2011). Reviewing the business case for corporate social responsibility: New evidence and analysis. Journal of Business Ethics. Retrieved May 22, 2011 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0867-0

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). San Diego: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W., Wukotch, R., Harrington, K., & Dennis, B. (2004). Organizational attractiveness and corporate social orientation: Do our values influence our preference for affirmative action and management diversity? Business and Society, 43, 69–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talaulicar, T. (2006). Unternehmenskodizes, Typen und Normierungsstrategien zur Implementierung einer Unternehmensethik. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. J. (2005). Is there a market for virtue: The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47(4), 19–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, J., Schmiedeknecht, M., & Heck, A. (2009). Informal und regional. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) bei kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen. In J. Wieland (Ed.), CSR als Netzwerkgovernance:Theoretische Herausforderungen und praktische Antworten (Vol. 7, pp. 70–79). Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Eigenstetter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Mean Values and Standard Deviations in the Scales on Engagement in Customer Orientation and Product Safety, Environment, Supplier Relations, Employees

Do not agree at all = 1, Agree absolutely = 5.

Customer orientation and product safety

Level

N

Mean value

Stand. dev.

QM1. Regarding the products/services of our organisation only negligible residual risks arise for the customers

Legal

79

4.23

1.09

QM2. Regarding the products/services of our organisation a risk assessment was carried out

Legal

76

2.92

1.70

QM3. The reliability and quality of our products/services is checked regularly when delivering products/services

Ethical

78

4.03

1.38

QM4. Customer details are treated with the strictest of confidentiality

Legal

81

4.77

0.64

QM5. Complaints are answered quickly and precisely within a few days

Ethical

81

4.73

0.57

QM6. Complaints are analysed in the company from a customer orientated perspective

Ethical

80

4.31

1.09

QM7. Routines exist to change processes in order to clearly reduce the complaints rates

Ethical

79

3.80

1.42

QM8. We survey the requirements of the customers in respect of the services/products of our organisation in order to secure customer satisfaction

Philanthropic

77

3.96

1.16

QM9. We have offers for customers which extend beyond the statutory Warranties

Philanthropic

71

3.21

1.50

QM10. When marketing the products, only product or service features are described, which our products or services actually achieve

Ethical

73

4.52

0.82

Environment

Level

N

Mean value

Stand. dev.

EM1. The statutory provisions for the manufacturing of our Products/Services regarding conditions applicable to the protection of the environment (Air, Water, Working Materials …) are systematically implemented

Legal

70

4.41

1.00

EM2. We always enclose a description with the product (e.g. Safety Data Sheet), which clearly describes the environmental risks

Ethical

62

3.21

1.54

EM3. Our purchasing department has rules to ensure that ecological aspects are systematically considered

Ethical

63

3.00

1.28

EM4. When developing new products, ecological aspects are systematically considered equally to other product characteristics (e.g., energy consumption, disposal)

Ethical

60

3.43

1.32

EM5. There are rules on how waste products have to be disposed of in accordance with statutory conditions

Legal

69

4.42

0.85

EM6. There are rules to keep minimise wastes

Ethical

66

3.92

1.06

EM7. There are rules to minimise energy consumption in the company

Ethical

68

4.10

1.01

EM8. The transport processes were examined in order to minimise the energy costs

Ethical

68

3.62

1.27

EM9. Employees are instructed how to deal carefully with natural resources

Ethical

67

3.88

1.11

EM10. Customers, Supplier and Local Authorities receive information on the environmentally-related impacts of the Products/Services which they receive from our company

Philanthropic

62

2.87

1.43

EM11. We regularly (at least once a year) support projects financially or with human resources (e.g. at schools and local authorities), in order to promote environmentally compatible behaviour

Philanthropic

62

2.15

1.38

Supplier relations

Level

N

Mean value

Stand. dev.

SR1. We regularly visit suppliers in their production facilities

Ethical

55

2.82

1.09

SR2. Suppliers are checked to ensure they maintain the rules to ensure they meet the regulations on the health and safety of their employees

Ethical

52

2.27

1.14

SR3. Our Company/Our Organisation passes Knowhow on to Suppliers, in order to support them

Philanthropic

52

2.90

1.32

SR4. We have rules to secure the openness and transparency in the contracts

Ethical

53

2.96

1.16

SR5. Our Company/Our Organisation has rules to quickly meet the requirements of its suppliers (6 weeks max. after receipt of the invoice)

Ethical

54

4.17

1.09

SR6. Our Company/Our Organisation aims for long-term relations with suppliers

Ethical

56

4.64

0.59

SR7. The Company/The Organisation engages in regular Dialogue with the Suppliers, in order to improve mutual relations

Ethical

55

4.51

0.72

Employees

Level

N

Mean value

Stand. dev.

E1. In the Company/In the Organisation regular risk analyses are carried out at the work desks

Legal

53

3.45

1.39

E2. Special offerings are made to keep the employees health, such as industrial health promotion measures

Ethical

52

3.10

1.38

E3. Employees work the legally prescribed working hours

Legal

58

4.55

0.75

E4. Necessary recovery hours (breaks, rest times) are fully met

Legal

56

4.30

0.87

E5. Additional work times are not permanently demanded to employees

Ethical

56

4.59

0.76

E6. Procedures are in place to ensure that employees of differing Gender, Race, Disability, Origin, Religion, Age or Sexual Orientation are treated equally

Legal

54

3.94

1.34

E7. The work has been arranged in such a way for older employees as well (>50 Years) that it can be practised through to pension age

Ethical

56

4.36

1.00

E8. Special measures in the field of company re-integration are in place for employees who have fallen ill

Legal

51

3.08

1.37

E9. Employees are paid in accordance with the defined minimum wage for the industry. If not applicable: Where no minimum wages apply, wages are not paid at a level of less than 8 € per hour)

Ethical

55

4.47

1.10

E10. Employees are paid on a performance/achievement basis

Ethical

56

3.88

1.27

E11. Employees are supported if they wish to gain further qualifications

Ethical

55

4.38

0.83

E12. Employees receive many kinds of support in order to agree on private and professional goals and objectives

Ethical

55

4.22

0.94

E13. Employees are asked about their identification and satisfaction with the organisation and management and are informed about the results

Ethical

54

3.44

1.34

E14. Organisation development measures are—if required—carried out with the participation of employees

Ethical

53

4.11

0.85

E15. Employee details and data are treated confidentially

Legal

57

4.79

0.65

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eigenstetter, M., Zaharia, S. (2013). Is Engagement in CSR Motivated by the Defined Values of Entrepreneurs?. In: Schrader, U., Fricke, V., Doyle, D., Thoresen, V. (eds) Enabling Responsible Living. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22048-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics