Abstract
Companies have a high impact on responsible living while caring for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Entrepreneurs engaged in CSR often claim that they act on the basis of ethical values, namely through value orientations such as “Universalism” and “Benevolence”. In this investigation, the value orientations of the entrepreneurs, managing and owning small or mediums sized enterprises (SMEs), have been measured with the Schwartz Values Survey and have been related to their engagement, e.g., for the environment and their employees. The results are: Greater engagement for the environment and employees is correlated with greater “Universalism” and “Benevolence”. Unexpected positive correlations were found between the values “Security”, “Tradition”, “Stimulation” and “Engagement to Employees” respectively “Engagement to the Environment”. No correlations were found in the categories “Achievement” or “Power”. CSR finally does correlate with some desirable results of the companies, such as profit or a reduction in customer complaints. Therefore, CSR should be of strategic relevance to the entrepreneurs of SMEs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Assländer, M., & Löhr, A. (2010). Einführung: Zum Klärungsbedarf der Modevokabel “Corporate Social Responsibility”. In M. Assländer & A. Löhr (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in der Wirtschaftskrise (pp. 11–32). München: Rainer-Hampp-Verlag.
Bertelsmann Stiftung. (2007). Die gesellschaftliche Verantwortung von Unternehmen: Dokumentation der Ergebnisse einer Unternehmensbefragung der Bertelsmann Stiftung. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from http://www.bertelsmannstiftung.de/cps/rde/xchg/bst/hs.xsl/suche.htm?innerRequest=trueandsuchbegriff=shareholder
Braun, S. (2010). Zwischen nationalen Traditionen und globalen Herausforderungen: Gesellschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen in der sozialen Marktwirtschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In S. Braun (Ed.), Gesellschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen: Der deutsche Weg im internationalen Kontext (pp. 85–105). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization. Oxford: University Press.
Carroll, A. (2008). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. In A. Crane, D. Matten, & L. Spence (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in a global context (pp. 60–76). Oxon: Routledge.
Carroll, A., & Buchholtz, A. (2002). Business and society. Ethics and stakeholder management. Cincinnati: Thomson South-Western.
Dannenbring, J. (2010). Gesellschaftliches Engagement im Handwerk im Spannungsfeld zwischen Förderung und Regulierung. In M. Assländer & A. Löhr (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in der Wirtschaftskrise (pp. 247–265). München: Rainer-Hampp-Verlag.
European Commission. (2001). Corporate social responsibility green paper, promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2001:0366:FIN:en:PDF
European Commission. (2002). European SMEs and the social and environmental responsibility. Observatory of the European SMEs 2002/No 4. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/files/analysis/doc/smes_observatory_2002_report4_en.pdf
European Commission. (2003a). DG enterprise and industry, responsible entrepreneurship: A collection of good practice cases among small and medium-sized enterprises across Europe. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/114199/Responsible%20Entrepreneurship%20EU%202003.pdf
European Commission. (2003b). Commission recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:124:0036:0041:en:PDF
European Commission. Awareness-raising questionnaire. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/files/csr/campaign/documentation/download/questionaire_en.pdf
Gilde GmbH. (2007). Commitment to society by small and medium sized enterprises in Germany: Current situations and future development. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from http://www.csr-mittelstand.de/pdf/Studie_CSR_im_Mittelstand_Deutschland_EN.pdf
Hofmann, M., & Maaß, F. (2008). Corporate social responsibility als Erfolgsfaktor einer stakeholderbezogenen Führungsstrategie? Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung. In Institut für Mittelstandsforschung (Ed.), Jahrbuch zur Mittelstandsforschung (pp.1–51). Wiesbaden: Gabler.
Hutton, J., Goodman, M., Alexander, J., & Genest, C. (2001). Reputation management: The new face of corporate public relations? Public Relations, 27, 247–261.
IFM Bonn (Institut für Mittelstandsforschung Bonn) (Ed.). (2007). Die volkswirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Familienunternehmen. Gutachten im Auftrag der Stiftung Familienunternehmen. IfM-Materialien Nr. 172. Bonn:IFM Bonn.
Keh, T. K., & Xie, Y. (2009). Corporate reputation and customer behavioral intentions: The roles of trust, identification and commitment. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 732–742.
Laumen, S., Eigenstetter, M., & Packebusch, L. (2012). Evaluation des Modellvorhabens zur Optimierung der Produktionsabläufe und des Warentransports in KMU unter Verwendung integrativer Lösungsansätze zur Erhöhung der Gesundheit bei der Arbeit (ProWare).Abschlussbericht. Krefeld, Mönchengladbach: University of Applied Sciences.
Leisinger, K. M. (2003). Opportunities and risks of the United Nations Global Compact. The Novartis case study. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 11, 113–131.
Maaß, F. (2010). Strategischer Einsatz von corporate citizenship im deutschen Mittelstand. In S. Braun (Ed.), Gesellschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen. Der deutsche Weg im internationalen Kontext.(pp. 260–271). Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.
MacGregor, S., & Fontrodoan, J. (2008). Exploring the fit between CSR and innovation.IESE business school working paper No. 759. Navarra, Spain: University of Navarra. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1269334
Mendoca, M., & Kanungo, R. (2007). Ethical leadership. Maidenhead, London: Mc Graw Hill.
Moldaschl, M. (2004). Partizipation und/als/statt Demokratie. In W. Weber, P- P. Pasqualoni & C. Burtscher (Eds), Wirtschaft, Demokratie und soziale Verantwortung (pp. 216–245). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response biases. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). San Diego: Academic Press.
Parsons, T. (1964). The social system. New York: Free Press.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: Civic disengagement in America. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Pdsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
Schreck, P. (2011). Reviewing the business case for corporate social responsibility: New evidence and analysis. Journal of Business Ethics. Retrieved May 22, 2011 from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0867-0
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). San Diego: Academic Press
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550–562.
Smith, W., Wukotch, R., Harrington, K., & Dennis, B. (2004). Organizational attractiveness and corporate social orientation: Do our values influence our preference for affirmative action and management diversity? Business and Society, 43, 69–96.
Talaulicar, T. (2006). Unternehmenskodizes, Typen und Normierungsstrategien zur Implementierung einer Unternehmensethik. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
Vogel, D. J. (2005). Is there a market for virtue: The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47(4), 19–45.
Wieland, J., Schmiedeknecht, M., & Heck, A. (2009). Informal und regional. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) bei kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen. In J. Wieland (Ed.), CSR als Netzwerkgovernance:Theoretische Herausforderungen und praktische Antworten (Vol. 7, pp. 70–79). Marburg: Metropolis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Mean Values and Standard Deviations in the Scales on Engagement in Customer Orientation and Product Safety, Environment, Supplier Relations, Employees
Do not agree at all = 1, Agree absolutely = 5.
Customer orientation and product safety | Level | N | Mean value | Stand. dev. |
---|---|---|---|---|
QM1. Regarding the products/services of our organisation only negligible residual risks arise for the customers | Legal | 79 | 4.23 | 1.09 |
QM2. Regarding the products/services of our organisation a risk assessment was carried out | Legal | 76 | 2.92 | 1.70 |
QM3. The reliability and quality of our products/services is checked regularly when delivering products/services | Ethical | 78 | 4.03 | 1.38 |
QM4. Customer details are treated with the strictest of confidentiality | Legal | 81 | 4.77 | 0.64 |
QM5. Complaints are answered quickly and precisely within a few days | Ethical | 81 | 4.73 | 0.57 |
QM6. Complaints are analysed in the company from a customer orientated perspective | Ethical | 80 | 4.31 | 1.09 |
QM7. Routines exist to change processes in order to clearly reduce the complaints rates | Ethical | 79 | 3.80 | 1.42 |
QM8. We survey the requirements of the customers in respect of the services/products of our organisation in order to secure customer satisfaction | Philanthropic | 77 | 3.96 | 1.16 |
QM9. We have offers for customers which extend beyond the statutory Warranties | Philanthropic | 71 | 3.21 | 1.50 |
QM10. When marketing the products, only product or service features are described, which our products or services actually achieve | Ethical | 73 | 4.52 | 0.82 |
Environment | Level | N | Mean value | Stand. dev. |
---|---|---|---|---|
EM1. The statutory provisions for the manufacturing of our Products/Services regarding conditions applicable to the protection of the environment (Air, Water, Working Materials …) are systematically implemented | Legal | 70 | 4.41 | 1.00 |
EM2. We always enclose a description with the product (e.g. Safety Data Sheet), which clearly describes the environmental risks | Ethical | 62 | 3.21 | 1.54 |
EM3. Our purchasing department has rules to ensure that ecological aspects are systematically considered | Ethical | 63 | 3.00 | 1.28 |
EM4. When developing new products, ecological aspects are systematically considered equally to other product characteristics (e.g., energy consumption, disposal) | Ethical | 60 | 3.43 | 1.32 |
EM5. There are rules on how waste products have to be disposed of in accordance with statutory conditions | Legal | 69 | 4.42 | 0.85 |
EM6. There are rules to keep minimise wastes | Ethical | 66 | 3.92 | 1.06 |
EM7. There are rules to minimise energy consumption in the company | Ethical | 68 | 4.10 | 1.01 |
EM8. The transport processes were examined in order to minimise the energy costs | Ethical | 68 | 3.62 | 1.27 |
EM9. Employees are instructed how to deal carefully with natural resources | Ethical | 67 | 3.88 | 1.11 |
EM10. Customers, Supplier and Local Authorities receive information on the environmentally-related impacts of the Products/Services which they receive from our company | Philanthropic | 62 | 2.87 | 1.43 |
EM11. We regularly (at least once a year) support projects financially or with human resources (e.g. at schools and local authorities), in order to promote environmentally compatible behaviour | Philanthropic | 62 | 2.15 | 1.38 |
Supplier relations | Level | N | Mean value | Stand. dev. |
---|---|---|---|---|
SR1. We regularly visit suppliers in their production facilities | Ethical | 55 | 2.82 | 1.09 |
SR2. Suppliers are checked to ensure they maintain the rules to ensure they meet the regulations on the health and safety of their employees | Ethical | 52 | 2.27 | 1.14 |
SR3. Our Company/Our Organisation passes Knowhow on to Suppliers, in order to support them | Philanthropic | 52 | 2.90 | 1.32 |
SR4. We have rules to secure the openness and transparency in the contracts | Ethical | 53 | 2.96 | 1.16 |
SR5. Our Company/Our Organisation has rules to quickly meet the requirements of its suppliers (6 weeks max. after receipt of the invoice) | Ethical | 54 | 4.17 | 1.09 |
SR6. Our Company/Our Organisation aims for long-term relations with suppliers | Ethical | 56 | 4.64 | 0.59 |
SR7. The Company/The Organisation engages in regular Dialogue with the Suppliers, in order to improve mutual relations | Ethical | 55 | 4.51 | 0.72 |
Employees | Level | N | Mean value | Stand. dev. |
---|---|---|---|---|
E1. In the Company/In the Organisation regular risk analyses are carried out at the work desks | Legal | 53 | 3.45 | 1.39 |
E2. Special offerings are made to keep the employees health, such as industrial health promotion measures | Ethical | 52 | 3.10 | 1.38 |
E3. Employees work the legally prescribed working hours | Legal | 58 | 4.55 | 0.75 |
E4. Necessary recovery hours (breaks, rest times) are fully met | Legal | 56 | 4.30 | 0.87 |
E5. Additional work times are not permanently demanded to employees | Ethical | 56 | 4.59 | 0.76 |
E6. Procedures are in place to ensure that employees of differing Gender, Race, Disability, Origin, Religion, Age or Sexual Orientation are treated equally | Legal | 54 | 3.94 | 1.34 |
E7. The work has been arranged in such a way for older employees as well (>50 Years) that it can be practised through to pension age | Ethical | 56 | 4.36 | 1.00 |
E8. Special measures in the field of company re-integration are in place for employees who have fallen ill | Legal | 51 | 3.08 | 1.37 |
E9. Employees are paid in accordance with the defined minimum wage for the industry. If not applicable: Where no minimum wages apply, wages are not paid at a level of less than 8 € per hour) | Ethical | 55 | 4.47 | 1.10 |
E10. Employees are paid on a performance/achievement basis | Ethical | 56 | 3.88 | 1.27 |
E11. Employees are supported if they wish to gain further qualifications | Ethical | 55 | 4.38 | 0.83 |
E12. Employees receive many kinds of support in order to agree on private and professional goals and objectives | Ethical | 55 | 4.22 | 0.94 |
E13. Employees are asked about their identification and satisfaction with the organisation and management and are informed about the results | Ethical | 54 | 3.44 | 1.34 |
E14. Organisation development measures are—if required—carried out with the participation of employees | Ethical | 53 | 4.11 | 0.85 |
E15. Employee details and data are treated confidentially | Legal | 57 | 4.79 | 0.65 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eigenstetter, M., Zaharia, S. (2013). Is Engagement in CSR Motivated by the Defined Values of Entrepreneurs?. In: Schrader, U., Fricke, V., Doyle, D., Thoresen, V. (eds) Enabling Responsible Living. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22048-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22048-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22047-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22048-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)