Skip to main content

Privacy in Social Network Sites

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Privacy Online

Abstract

Are we running out of privacy? Nowadays, for example, we are concerned about whether the maintenance of a private sphere in online environments has become a luxury commodity (Papacharissi 2009). Questions of this kind are justified as online communication plays an increasingly important role in people’s everyday life (cf., e.g., Lundby 2009). While it seems exaggerated to stigmatize today’s youth as “communication junkies” (Patalong 2010), online conversations are increasingly becoming a functional equivalent to face to face communication (Beer 2008). However, some significant differences between online and “offline” communication remain. Face to face communication may remain largely intimate in some situations. It does not necessarily require the disclosure of personal data nor does it leave behind traces (Dwyer et al. 2007; Tufekci 2008). In contrast, online communication is usually mediated by providers with commercial interests. These providers do not confine themselves to gathering personal data and the content of user communications, rather they try to make conversations as public as possible by default (Gross and Acquisti 2005; Acquisti and Gross 2006). Additionally, the speed of technological progress often exceeds the time Internet users need to cultivate awareness for potential risks resulting from the use of these communication measures (Livingstone 2008). Thus, questions about how users manage their privacy online are topical for a majority of social services of the Social Web.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acquisti A, Gross R (2006) Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In: Golle P, Danezis G (eds) Proceedings of 6th workshop on privacy enhancing technologies, Robinson College, Cambridge, pp 36–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman I (1976) Privacy: a conceptual analysis. Environ Behav 8(7):7–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes SB (2006) A privacy paradox: social networking in the United States. First Monday 11(4). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1394/1312#b1

  • Beer D (2008) Social network(ing) sites… revisiting the story so far: a response to danah boyd & Nicole Ellison. J Comput Mediat Commun 13:516–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ze’ev A (2003) Privacy, emotional closeness, and openness in cyberspace. Comput Hum Behav 19:451–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • boyd dm (2008) Facebook’s privacy trainwreck. Convergence 14(1):13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • boyd dm, Ellison NB (2008) Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput Mediat Commun 13:210–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • boyd d, Hargittai E (2010) Facebook privacy settings: who cares? First Monday 15(8). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3086/2589

  • Bruns A (2006) Towards produsage: futures for user-led content production. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/4863/1/4863_1.pdf

  • Burgoon JK, Parrott R, LePoire BA, Kelley DL, Walther JB, Perry D (1989) Maintaining and restoring privacy through communication in different types of relationship. J Soc Pers Relat 6:131–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cachia R (2008) Social computing: study on the use and impact of online social networking: IPTS exploratory research on the socio-economic impact of social computing. JRC European Commission, Spain. http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC48650.pdf

  • Cohen JE (2000) Examined lives: informational privacy and the subject as object. Stanford Law Rev 52(5):1373–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 94(Supplement):95–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranor LF (1999) Internet privacy. Commun ACM 42:29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debatin B, Lovejoy JP, Horn AK, Hughes BN (2009) Facebook and online privacy. Attitudes, behaviors and unintended consequences. J Comput Mediat Commun 15:83–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer C, Hiltz SR, Passerini K (2007) Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: a comparison of Facebook and MySpace. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth Americas conference on information systems, Keystone

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist (2010) Privacy 2.0, pp 18–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C (2007) The benefits of Facebook “Friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J Comput Mediat Commun 12:1143–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni A, Etzioni O (1999) Face-to-face and computer-mediated communities, a comparative analysis. Inf Soc 15(4):241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Facebook (2010) Facebook landing page. http://www.facebook.com

  • Facebook (2010) Statement of rights and responsibilities. http://www.facebook.com/terms.php?ref=pf

  • Gadzheva M (2008) Privacy in the age of transparency: the new vulnerability of the individual. Soc Sci Comput Rev 26(1):60–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangadharbatla H (2008) Facebook Me: collective self-esteem, need to belong, and internet self-efficacy as predictors of the iGeneration’s attitudes toward social networking sites. J Interact Advert 8(2):5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Double Day, Garden City

    Google Scholar 

  • Govani T, Pashley H (2005) Student awareness of the privacy implications when using Facebook. Paper presented at the privacy poster fair at Carnegie Mellon university school of library and information science, Dec 14, http://lorrie.cranor.org/courses/fa05/tubzhlp.pdf

  • Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross R, Acquisti A (2005) Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on privacy in the electronic society, ACM Press, New York, pp 71–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann M (2009) Everyday: domestication of mediatization or mediatized domestication. In: Lundby K (ed) Mediatization: concept, changes, consequences. Lang, New York, pp 225–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasebrink U (2004) Konvergenz aus Nutzerperspektive: Das Konzept der Kommunikationsmodi. [Convergence from the user perspective]. In: Hasebrink U (ed) Reihe Rezeptionsforschung, vol 1, Mediennutzung in konvergierenden Medienumgebungen [Vol. 1: media use in converging media environments]. Fischer, München, pp 67–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Haythornthwaite C (2007) Social networks and online community. In: Joinson AN, McKenna KYA, Postmes T, Reips U-D (eds) The Oxford handbook of internet psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 121–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Joinson AN, Paine CB (2007) Self-disclosure, privacy and the internet. In: Joinson AN, McKenna KYA, Postmes T, Reips U-D (eds) The Oxford handbook of internet psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 237–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Jourard SM, Lasakow P (1958) Some factors in self-disclosure. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 56(1):91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krämer NC, Winter S (2008) Impression management 2.0. The relationship of self-esteem, extraversion, self-efficacy, and self-presentation within social networking sites. J Media Psychol 20(3):106–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange PG (2008) Publicly private and privately public: social networking on YouTube. J Comput Mediat Commun 13(1):361–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis K, Kaufman J, Christakis N (2008) The taste for privacy: an analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. J Comput Mediat Commun 14:79–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone S (2008) Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media Soc 10(3):393–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundby K (ed) (2009) Mediatization: concept, changes, consequences. Lang, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis ST (2003) On the status and contribution of Westin’s and Altman’s theories of privacy. J Social Issues 59(2):411–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger MJ (2004) Privacy, trust, and disclosure: exploring barriers to electronic commerce. J Comput Mediat Commun 9(4). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue4/metzger.html

  • Nguyen J (2010) The state of social networks. http://comscore.com/Press_Events/Presentations_Whitepapers/2010/The_State_of_Social_Networks_in_Asia_Pacific_with_a_Focus_on_Singapore/(language)/eng-US

  • Nielsen Online (2009) Global faces and networked places: a Nielsen report on social networking’s new global footprint. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/nielsen_globalfaces_mar09.pdf

  • Papacharissi Z (2009) The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and Asmallworld. New Media Soc 11(1–2):199–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patalong F (2010) Jugendliche sind Kommunikations-Junkies: Kernergebnisse der JIM-Studie 2010 [Teenagers are communication junkies: core results of the JIM study]. Spiegel Online. http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/0,1518,731352,00.html

  • Putnam RD (2000) Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz W (2004) Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. Eur J Commun 19(1):87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiger W, Quiring O (2005) User-generated content on mass media web sites – just a variety of interactivity or something completely different? Paper presented at the 55th annual conference of the international communication association, New York, 26–30 May 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Siibak A (2009) Constructing the self through the photo selection-visual impression management on social networking websites. Cyberpsychol J Psychosoc Res Cyberspace 3(1). http://cyberpsychology.eu/view.php?cisloclanku=2009061501&article=1

  • Stutzman F, Kramer-Duffield J (2010) Friends only: examining a privacy-enhancing behavior in Facebook. CHI Atlanta, 10–15 Apr 2010. http://fredstutzman.com/papers/CHI2010_Stutzman.pdf

  • Tavani HT (2000) Privacy and the internet. http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/law/st_org/iptf/commentary/content/2000041901.html

  • Thrift N (2005) Knowing capitalism. Theory, culture and society. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci Z (2008) Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. B Sci Technol Soc 28(1):20–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utz S, Krämer NC (2009) The privacy paradox on social network sites revisited: the role of individual characteristics and group norms. Cyberpsychol J Psychosoc Res Cyberspace 3(2), Article 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther JB, DeAndrea D, Kim J, Anthony JC (2010) The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Hum Commun Res 36(4):469–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren SD, Brandeis LD (1890) The right to privacy. Harvard Law Rev 4(5):193–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westin A (1967) Privacy and freedom. Atheneum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S, Grasmuck S, Martin J (2008) Identity construction on Facebook: digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Comput Hum Behav 24:1816–1836

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Ziegele .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ziegele, M., Quiring, O. (2011). Privacy in Social Network Sites. In: Trepte, S., Reinecke, L. (eds) Privacy Online. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21520-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21521-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics