Skip to main content

On Expanding the Scope of Design Science in IS Research

  • Conference paper
Book cover Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research (DESRIST 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6629))

Abstract

Design Science Research (DSR) has sparked a renaissance of contributions to IS, but its rigor and value of DSR could be increased by expanding its scope beyond its engineering roots to bring all modes of scientific inquiry to bear – exploratory, theoretical , experimental, and applied science / engineering (AS/E). All DSR Cycle activities can be realized as instances of one or more of the four modes. The rigor of DSR can therefore be defended in terms of the goals, research products, and standards of rigor already established for each mode. There is, moreover, a synergy among the modes that can only be realized when all four are brought to bear, because each informs the other three. To exclude any mode of inquiry from DSR, therefore, is to impoverish knowledge about its objects of inquiry. Based on these insights, we propose a modified Cycles Model for DSR realized under the disciplines of the four modes of scientific inquiry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quart. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Venkatesh, V., Brown, S., Maruping, L., Bala, H.: Predicting Different Conceptualizations of System Use: The Competing Roles of Behavioral Intention, Facilitating Conditions, and Behavioral Expectation. MIS Quart. 32(3), 483–502 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Titah, R.: Nonlinearities Between Attitude and Subjective Norms in Information Technology Acceptance: A Negative Synergy? MIS Quart. 33(4), 827–844 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Karr-Wisniewski, P., Lu, Y.: When More is Too Much: Operationalizing Technology Overload and Exploring its Impact on Knowledge Worker Productivity. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(5), 1061–1072 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design Science Research: Looking to the Future. In: Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S. (eds.) Design Research in Information Systems, pp. 261–268. Springer, New York (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Iivari, J.: A Paradigmatic Analysis of Information Systems as a Design Science. Scand. J. Inform. Syst. 19(2), 39–64 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schwaber, K., Beedle, M.: Agile Software Development with Scrum, vol. 18. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I.: The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison-Wesley Object Technology Series. Addison-Wesley Professional, Reading (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, P.: The Entity-Relationship Model—Toward a Unified View of Data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS) 1(1), 9–36 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Codd, E.: A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks. Commun. ACM 13(6), 377–387 (1970)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. J. Manag. Inform. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Indulska, M., Recker, J.: Design Science in IS Research: A Literature Analysis. In: Gregor, S., Ho, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th Biennial ANU Workshop on Information Systems Foundations, Canberra, Australia, October 2-3, pp. 1–13 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stebbins, R.: Exploratory Research in the Social Sciences. Sage Pubs, Inc., Thousand Oaks (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Vogt, P.W.: Dictionary of Statistics & Methodology: A Nontechnical Guide for the Social Sciences, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sharpe, P.B.: A Critical Analysis of the Canons of Science. Philos. Sci. 7(2), 159–167 (1940)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Adam, M.: Variables Affecting Information Technology End-User Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52(4), 751–771 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lofland, J.: Doing Social Life: The Qualitative Study of Human Interaction in Natural Settings. Wiley, New York (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Popper, K.: The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Psychology Press, San Diego (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The Anatomy of a Design Theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8(5), 312–335 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gregor, S.: The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. Manag. Inform. Syst. Quart. 30(3), 611–642 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bacharach, S.: Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation. Acad. Manage. Rev. 14(4), 496–515 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Oliver, R.: A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. J. Market. Res. 17(4), 460–469 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Briggs, R., Reinig, B., de Vreede, G.: The Yield Shift Theory of Satisfaction and its Application to the IS/IT Domain. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 9(5), 267–293 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cook, T., Shadish, W., Campbell, D.: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Godfrey-Smith, P.: Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Konig, W.: Goals of Technological Sciences (In German: Ziele der Technikwissenschaften). In: Banse, G., Grunwald, A., Konig, W., Ropohl, G. (eds.) Cognition and Design - A Theory of the Technological Sciences (in German: Erkennen und Gestalten - eine Theorie der Technikwissenschaften), pp. 84–98. Edition sigma, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kornwachs, K.: Technological Knowledge (In German: Technisches Wissen). In: Banse, G., Grunwald, A., Konig, W., Ropohl, G. (eds.) Cognition and Design - A Theory of the Technological Sciences (in German: Erkennen und Gestalten - eine Theorie der Technikwissenschaften), pp. 71–84. Edition sigma, Berlin (2006a)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bunge, M.: Scientific Research. Searching for Truth, vol. I. Springer, Berlin (1967)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Jobs, E.: General Problems of Technological Cognition (in German: Allgemeine Probleme technikwissenschaftlicher Erkenntnis). In: Banse, G., Grunwald, A., Konig, W., Ropohl, G. (eds.) Cognition and Design - A Theory of the Technological Sciences (in German: Erkennen und Gestalten - eine Theorie der Technikwissenschaften), pp. 184–239. Edition sigma, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Alexander, C.: The Timeless Way of Building. Oxford University Press, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Scheer, A.W.: Business Process Engineering - Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Booch, G., Maksimchuk, R., Engle, M., Young, B., Conallen, J., Houston, K.: Object-Oriented Analysis and Design With Applications. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Meyer, C.: Seeking “Asimov Moments.” Now, New Next Blog. Harvared Business Review (2008), http://blogs.hbr.org/now-new-next/2008/10/welcome-to-now-new-next.html (accessed January 28, 2011)

  35. Frank, U.: Die Konstruktion möglicher Welten als Chance und Herausforderung der Wirtschaftsinformatik. In: Becker, J., Krcmar, H., Niehaves, B. (Hrsg.) Wissenschaftstheorie und gestaltungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 167–180. Physica, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schwabe, G., Krcmar, H.: Piloting a Sociotechnical Innovation. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Information Systems ECIS 2000, pp. 132–139 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Briggs, R.O., Schwabe, G. (2011). On Expanding the Scope of Design Science in IS Research. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds) Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research. DESRIST 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6629. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20632-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20633-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics