Skip to main content

Engineered Scaffolds and Matrices: Tailored Biomaterials for Adipose Stem Cell Engineering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1490 Accesses

Abstract

Due to the limitations of current soft-tissue reconstruction and replacement methods there is a need to develop new, clinically relevant alternatives. Employing stem-cell-inclusive tissue engineering methods as a means to generate adipose tissue may offer patients a new reconstructive option using their own healthy cells and may offer a clinically feasible “just-in-time” solution. Injectable, tailored composite systems, consisting of cellular beads in a hydrogel carrier, may be injected at a soft tissue defect site in a minimally invasive manner. A proof-of-concept case study, highlighting reconstruction for breast cancer application, is presented in which the modulation of scaffold surface texture and chemistry causes changes in preadipocyte cell behavior. Specifically, the results compare cellular differentiation of preadipocytes on a 2-D surface of polystyrene and on 3-D surfaces of gelatin and polylactide (PL) through assessment of lipid production, cell number, cell viability, and gene expression. The gelatin scaffolds show more promise, over an 18-day culture period, for use in the injectable composite system as a cellular support device rather than the PL scaffolds; however, these two materials are assessed only to provide evidence that if carefully selected and exploited, a biomaterial can stimulate targeted cellular behaviors. That is, the goal of the case study is not to promote two specific materials but, rather, the goal is to demonstrate modularity of the injectable system for a wide range of materials. Cells seeded on the gelatin microspheres were more proliferative and produced more triglycerides than those seeded on the PL microspheres. Both scaffolds can be used in combination to form an injectable composite system, the PL microspheres more likely serving as a drug delivery vehicle or filler material, and the gelatin microspheres functioning as cellular carriers. The injectable composite system provides a platform into which beads of different chemistries and morphologies may be integrated to construct a tailored implant for stem cell engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. American Society of Breast Surgeons (2010) http://www.breastsurgeons.org/ Accessed on 5/24/2011

  2. Bauer-Kreisel P, Goepferich A, Blunk T (2010) Cell-delivery therapeutics for adipose tissue regeneration. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 62(7–8):798–813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burg KJL, Shalaby SW (1997) Physicochemical changes in degrading polylactide films. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 9(1):15–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burg KJL, Shalaby SW (1997) Water fugacity in absorbing polymers. J Biomed Mater Res 38(4):337–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burg KJL, Shalaby SW (1999) Biodegradable materials. In: Zilla P, Greisler HP (eds) Tissue engineering of prosthetic vascular grafts. R.G. Landes, Austin, p 505

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burg KJL, Austin CE, Culberson CR, Greene KG, Halberstadt CR, Holder WD Jr, Loebsack AB, Roland WD (2000) A novel approach to tissue engineering: injectable composites. Transactions of the 2000 World Biomaterials Congress, Kamuela, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burton GR, Guan Y, Nagarajan R, McGehee RE Jr (2002) Microarray analysis of gene expression during early adipocyte differentiation. Gene 293(1–2):21–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Darlington GJ, Ross SE, MacDougald OA (1998) The role of C/EBP genes in adipocyte differentiation. J Biol Chem 273(46):30057–30060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Energy Beam Sciences (2004) Oil red O stain for glycol methacrylate sections. http://www.ebsciences.com/histology/gma_oilredo.htm Accessed on 5/24/2011

  10. Fischbach C, Seufert J, Staiger H, Hacker M, Neubauer M, Gopferich A, Blunk T (2004) Three-dimensional in vitro model of adipogenesis: comparison of culture conditions. Tissue Eng 10(1–2):215–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fleming JV, Fontanier N, Harries DN, Rees WD (1997) The growth arrest genes GAS5, GAS6, and CHOP-10 (GADD153) are expressed in the mouse preimplantation embryo. Mol Reprod Dev 48(3):310–316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffith LG (2002) Emerging design principles in biomaterials and scaffolds for tissue engineering. Ann NY Acad Sci 961:83–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gomillion CT, Burg KJL (2006) Stem cells and soft tissue engineering. Biomater 27:6052–6063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gomillion CT, Parzel CA, White RL Jr, Burg KJL (2007) Tissue engineering: breast. Encyclopedia of biomaterials and biomedical engineering. Informa Healthcare, Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jain RA (2000) The manufacturing techniques of various drug loaded biodegradable poly (lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) devices. Biomater 21(23):2475–2490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. James R, Jenkins L, Ellis SE, Burg KJL (2004) Histological processing of hydrogel scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. J Histotechnol 27(2):133–139

    Google Scholar 

  17. Langer R (1997) Tissue engineering: a new field and its challenges. Pharm Res 14:840–841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu L, Peter SJ, Lyman MD, Lai HL, Leite SM, Tamada JA, Vacanti JP, Langer R, Mikos AG (2000) In vitro degradation of porous poly (L-lactic acid) foams. Biomater 21(15):1595–1605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lydon MJ, Clay CS (1985) Substratum topography and cell traction on sulfuric-acid treated bacteriological-grade plastic. Cell Biol Int Rep 9(10):911–921

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Malda J, Kreijveld E, Temenoff JS, van Blitterswijk CA, Riesle J (2003) Expansion of human nasal chondrocytes on macroporous microcarriers enhances redifferentiation. Biomater 24(28):5153–5161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Migliaresi C, Fambri L, Cohn D (1994) A study on the in-vitro degradation of poly (lactic acid). J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 5(6):591–606

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. National Cancer Institute (2010) http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/commoncancers Accessed on 5/24/2011

  23. Park A, Griffith Cima L (1996) In vitro cell response to differences in poly-L-lactide crystallinity. J Biomed Mater Res 31(1):117–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Patrick CW Jr, Chauvin PB, Robb GL (1998) Tissue engineered adipose. In: Patrick CW Jr, Mikos AG, McIntire LV (eds) Frontiers in tissue engineering. Elsevier, Houston, p 369

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Qui J, Ogus S, Lu R, Chehab FF (2001) Transgenic mice overexpressing leptin accumulate adipose mass at an older, but not younger, age. Endocrinol 142(1):1348–1358

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shenaq SM, Yukse E (2002) New research in breast reconstruction – adipose tissue engineering. Clin Plast Surg 29:111–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shugart EC, Levenson AS, Constance CM, Umek RM (1995) Differential expression of GAS and GADD genes at distinct growth arrest points during adipocyte development. Cell Growth Differ 6(12):1541–1547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tang QQ, Lane MD (2000) Role of C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP-10) in the programmed activation of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein-beta during adipogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(23):12446–12450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. von Recum AF, Shannon CE, Cannon CE, Long KJ, van Kooten TG, Meyle J (1996) Surface roughness, porosity, and texture as modifiers of cellular adhesion. Tissue Eng 2(4):241–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Warne JP (2003) Tumour necrosis factor alpha: a key regulator of adipose tissue mass. J Endocrinol 177(3):351–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zen-Bio, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC. Cultured human adipocyte differentiation assay kit. http://www.zen-bio.com Accessed on 5/24/2011

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge technical support from Dina Basalyga, Chuck Thomas, Kim Ivey, Joan Hudson, and Larry Grimes. Funding for work presented in this chapter was provided by the National Science Foundation PECASE (BES 0093805) grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen J. L. Burg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burg, K.J.L., Cavin, N.M., Neser, K. (2011). Engineered Scaffolds and Matrices: Tailored Biomaterials for Adipose Stem Cell Engineering. In: Illouz, YG., Sterodimas, A. (eds) Adipose Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20012-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20012-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20011-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20012-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics