Abstract
Research in humanreasoning has gathered increasing evidence that people tend to reason on the basis of contextualized representations, thus making conclusions compatible with previous knowledge and beliefs, regardless of the logical form of the arguments. This experiment aimed at investigating whether and to what extent sentential reasoning (i.e.reasoning based on compound sentences formed with connectives such as if/then, and, or) was sensitive to the phenomenon of belief effects, under different instruction sets. In a 3x2x2 mixed design (with the last variable as a within-subjects variable), connective sentence (conditional, conjunction and incompatible disjunction), instruction set (logical vs. pragmatic), and statement believability (high vs. low) were varied. Results showed that conjunctions were affected by both instruction set and statement believability, conditionals were affected only by statement believability, whereas no effect of experimental manipulation was found on incompatible disjunctions. Theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gentzen, G.: Unstersuchungen über das logische Schliessen. Math. Zeitschrift 39, 176–210 (1935); Eng. Tr. Investigations into logical deduction. American Philosophical Quarterly, 1, 288-306 (1964)
Braine, M.D.S.: On the relation between the natural logic of reasoning and standard logic. Psychological Review 85, 1–21 (1978)
Braine, M.D.S., Reiser, B.J., Rumain, B.: Some empirical justification for a theory of natural prepositional logic. In: Bower, G.H. (ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and thinking, pp. 317–371. Academic Press, New York (1984)
Braine, M.D.S.: The natural logic approach to reasoning. In: Overton, W.F. (ed.) Reasoning, necessity, and logic: Developmental perspectives, pp. 133–157. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1990)
Braine, M.D.S., O’Brien, D.P.: A theory of if: A lexical entry, reasoning program, and pragmatic principles. Psychological Review 98, 182–203 (1991)
Osherson, D.N.: Models of logical thinking. In: Falmagne, R. (ed.) Reasoning: Representation and process in children and adults, pp. 81–91. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1975)
Rips, L.J.: Cognitive processes in propositional reasoning. Psychological Review 90, 38–71 (1983)
Rips, L.J.: The psychology of proof: Deductive reasoning and human thinking. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)
Johnson-Laird, P.N., Byrne, R.M.J., Schaeken, W.: Propositional reasoning by model. Psychological Review 99, 418–439 (1992)
Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Deductive reasoning. Annual Review of Psychology 50, 109–135 (1999)
Johnson-Laird, P.N., Byrne, R.M.J.: Conditionals: a theory of meaning, pragmatics, inference. Psychological Review 109, 646–678 (2002)
Byrne, R.M.J., Johnson-Laird, P.N.: “If” and the problem of conditional reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13, 282–287 (2009)
Johnson-Laird, P.: Deductive reasoning. WIREs Cognitive Science 1, 8–17 (2010)
O’Brien, D.P., Braine, M.D.S., Yang, Y.: Propositional reasoning by mental models? Simple to refute in principle and in practice. Psychological Review 101, 711–724 (1994)
Braine, M.D.S., O’Brien, D.P., Noveck, I.A., Samuels, M.C., Lea, R.B., Fisch, S.M., Yang, Y.: Predicting intermediate and multiple conclusions in propositional logic inference problems: further evidence for a mental logic. Journal of Experimental Psychology 124A, 263–292 (1995)
Garcıa-Madruga, J.A., Moreno, S., Carriedo, N., Gutierrez, F., Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Are conjunctive inferences easier than disjunctive inferences? A comparison of rules and models. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 54A, 613–632 (2001)
Garcıa-Madruga, J.A., Gutierrez, F., Carriedo, N., Luzón, J.M., Vila, J.O.: Mental models in propositional reasoning and working memory’s central executive. Thinking & Reasoning 13, 370–393 (2007)
Van der Henst, J.B., Yang, Y., Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Strategies in sentential reasoning. Cognitive Science 26, 425–468 (2002)
Johnson-Laird, P.N., Hasson, U.: Counterexamples in sentential reasoning. Memory and Cognition 31, 1105–1113 (2003)
Fillenbaum, S.I.: Or: Some uses. Journal of Experimental Psychology 103, 913–921 (1974)
Evans, J.S.B.T., Newstead, S.E.: A study of disjunctive reasoning. Psychological Research 41, 373–388 (1980)
Noveck, I.A., Chierchia, G., Chevaux, F., Guelminger, R., Sylvestre, E.: Linguistic-pragmatic factors in interpreting disjunctions. Thinking & Reasoning 8, 297–326 (2002)
Newstead, S.E., Griggs, R.A., Chrostowski, J.J.: Reasoning with realistic disjunctives. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 36A, 611–627 (1984)
Paris, S.G.: Comprehension of language connectives and propositional logical relationships. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 16, 278–291 (1973)
Fillenbaum, S.I.: On coping with ordered and unordered conjunctive sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology 87, 93–98 (1971)
Carston, R.: Thoughts and utterances. Blackwell, Oxford (2002)
Bott, L., Frisson, S., Murphy, G.L.: Interpreting conjunctions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62, 681–706 (2009)
Barrouillet, P., Grosset, N., Lecas, J.F.: Conditional reasoning by mental models: Chronometric and developmental evidence. Cognition 75, 237–266 (2000)
Rader, A.W., Sloutsky, V.S.: Processing of logically valid and logically invalid conditional inferences in discourse comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 28, 59–68 (2002)
Rader, A.W., Sloutsky, V.S.: Conjunctive bias in memory representations of logical connectives. Memory & Cognition 29, 838–849 (2001)
Evans, J., Evans, J.S.B.T.: Logic and human reasoning: An assessment of the deduction paradigm. Psychological Bulletin 128, 978–996 (2002)
Politzer, G.: Reasoning with conditionals. Topoi 26, 79–95 (2007)
Schroyens, W., Schaeken, W., Kristien Dieussaert, K.: The interpretation(s) of conditionals. Experimental Psychology 55, 173–181 (2008)
Stanovich, K.E.: Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Erlbaum, Mahwah (1999)
Evans, J.S.B.T.: In two minds: Dual process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 454–459 (2003)
Evans, J.S.B.T.: On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning 13, 321–339 (2007)
Evans, J.S.B.T.: In two minds: Dual processes and beyond. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)
Sloman, S.A.: The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 119, 3–22 (1996)
Sloman, S.A.: Two systems of reasoning. In: Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., Kahneman, D. (eds.) Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, pp. 379–398. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)
Stenning, K., van Lambalgen, M.: Explaining the domain-generality of human cognition. In: Roberts, M.J. (ed.) Integrating the mind, pp. 179–209. Psychology Press, London (2007)
Oaksford, M., Chater, N.: Précis of Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32, 69–84 (2009)
Jøsang, A.: A logic for uncertain probabilities. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 9, 279–311 (2001)
Jøsang, A.: Conditional reasoning with subjective logic. Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing 15, 5–38 (2008)
Oaksford, M., Chater, N.: Conditional probability and the cognitive science of conditional reasoning. Mind and Language 18, 359–379 (2003)
Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O.: The meaning(s) of conditionals: Conditional probabilities, mental models and personal utilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29, 680–693 (2003)
Liu, I.M., Lo, K.C., Wu, J.T.: A probabilistic interpretation of “If-Then”. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 49A, 828–844 (1996)
Evans, J.S.B.T., Handley, S.J., Over, D.E.: Conditionals and conditional probability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 29, 321–355 (2003)
Evans, J.S.B.T., Over, D.E.: If. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)
Ramsey, F.P.: The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1931)
Evans, J.S.B.T., Barston, J.L., Pollard, P.: On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition 11, 295–306 (1983)
Klauer, K.C., Musch, J., Naumer, B.: On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Psychological Review, 852–884 (2000)
Evans, J., Evans, J.S.B.T., Handley, S.J., Neilens, H., Over, D.: The influence of cognitive ability and instructional set on causal conditional inference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 63, 892–909 (2010)
Handley, S.J., Newstead, S.E., Trippas, D.: Logic, beliefs and instruction: A test of the default interventionist account of belief bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition (in press)
Evans, J.S.B.T., Allen, J.L., Newstead, S.E., Pollard, P.: Debiasing by instruction: The case of belief bias. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 6, 263–285 (1994)
Hertwig, R., Ortmann, A., Gigerenzer, G.: Deductive competence: A desert devoid of content and context. Current Psychology of Cognition 16, 102–107 (1997)
Matarazzo, O., Baldassarre, I.: Probability and instruction effects in syllogistic conditional reasoning. International Journal of Social Sciences 3, 163–171 (2008)
Malatesta, M.: An algorithm for deriving tautologies of logic of classes and relations from those of sentential calculus. Metalogicon, XIII 2, 89–123 (2000)
Palladino, D.: Corso di logica. Carocci, Roma (2002)
Peacocke, C.: Understanding logical constants: A realist’s account. Proceedings of the British Academy 73, 153–200 (1987)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matarazzo, O., Baldassarre, I. (2011). Instruction and Belief Effects on Sentential Reasoning. In: Esposito, A., Esposito, A.M., Martone, R., Müller, V.C., Scarpetta, G. (eds) Toward Autonomous, Adaptive, and Context-Aware Multimodal Interfaces. Theoretical and Practical Issues. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6456. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18184-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18184-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18183-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18184-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)