When owl:sameAs Isn’t the Same: An Analysis of Identity in Linked Data

  • Harry Halpin
  • Patrick J. Hayes
  • James P. McCusker
  • Deborah L. McGuinness
  • Henry S. Thompson
Conference paper

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17746-0_20

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6496)
Cite this paper as:
Halpin H., Hayes P.J., McCusker J.P., McGuinness D.L., Thompson H.S. (2010) When owl:sameAs Isn’t the Same: An Analysis of Identity in Linked Data. In: Patel-Schneider P.F. et al. (eds) The Semantic Web – ISWC 2010. ISWC 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6496. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

Abstract

In Linked Data, the use of owl:sameAs is ubiquitous in interlinking data-sets. There is however, ongoing discussion about its use, and potential misuse, particularly with regards to interactions with inference. In fact, owl:sameAs can be viewed as encoding only one point on a scale of similarity, one that is often too strong for many of its current uses. We describe how referentially opaque contexts that do not allow inference exist, and then outline some varieties of referentially-opaque alternatives to owl:sameAs. Finally, we report on an empirical experiment over randomly selected owl:sameAs statements from the Web of data. This theoretical apparatus and experiment shed light upon how owl:sameAs is being used (and misused) on the Web of data.

Keywords

linked data identity coreference 
Download to read the full conference paper text

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harry Halpin
    • 1
  • Patrick J. Hayes
    • 2
  • James P. McCusker
    • 3
  • Deborah L. McGuinness
    • 3
  • Henry S. Thompson
    • 1
  1. 1.School of InformaticsUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Institute for Human and Machine CognitionPensacolaUSA
  3. 3.Tetherless World Constellation, Department of Computer ScienceRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations