Deciding Agent Orientation on Ontology Mappings

  • Paul Doran
  • Terry R. Payne
  • Valentina Tamma
  • Ignazio Palmisano
Conference paper

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17746-0_11

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6496)
Cite this paper as:
Doran P., Payne T.R., Tamma V., Palmisano I. (2010) Deciding Agent Orientation on Ontology Mappings. In: Patel-Schneider P.F. et al. (eds) The Semantic Web – ISWC 2010. ISWC 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6496. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

Abstract

Effective communication in open environments relies on the ability of agents to reach a mutual understanding of the exchanged message by reconciling the vocabulary (ontology) used. Various approaches have considered how mutually acceptable mappings between corresponding concepts in the agents’ own ontologies may be determined dynamically through argumentation-based negotiation (such as Meaning-based Argumentation, MbA). In this paper we present a novel approach to the dynamic determination of mutually acceptable mappings, that allows agents to express a private acceptability threshold over the types of mappings they prefer. We empirically compare this approach with the Meaning-based Argumentation and demonstrate that the proposed approach produces larger agreed alignments thus better enabling agent communication. Furthermore, we compare and evaluate the fitness for purpose of the generated alignments, and we empirically demonstrate that the proposed approach has comparable performance to the MbA approach.

Download to read the full conference paper text

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Doran
    • 1
  • Terry R. Payne
    • 1
  • Valentina Tamma
    • 1
  • Ignazio Palmisano
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.School of Computer ScienceUniversity of ManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations