Abstract
It was chance that persuaded Kandinsky of the emotive power of abstract painting. He had failed to recognize one of his own works because it happened to be wrong way up, but found that it evoked feelings that were not there before.
In the following years he hesitated between an abstract with meaning, i.e., a symbolic language, which was the path that Klee took, and a pure abstract, that worked by unknowable chance.
What was Marcel Duchamp looking for with his incongruous “ready-made”s and his strange gamble where he “drew with chance”? And why did the composer Xenakis, when he wanted to escape the reflexes of tonal harmony, resort to bringing chance into the process of composing?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bouleau, N. (2011). Daring the Abstract in Art. In: Risk and Meaning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17647-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17647-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17646-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17647-0
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)