Skip to main content

Daring the Abstract in Art

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1601 Accesses

Abstract

It was chance that persuaded Kandinsky of the emotive power of abstract painting. He had failed to recognize one of his own works because it happened to be wrong way up, but found that it evoked feelings that were not there before.

In the following years he hesitated between an abstract with meaning, i.e., a symbolic language, which was the path that Klee took, and a pure abstract, that worked by unknowable chance.

What was Marcel Duchamp looking for with his incongruous “ready-made”s and his strange gamble where he “drew with chance”? And why did the composer Xenakis, when he wanted to escape the reflexes of tonal harmony, resort to bringing chance into the process of composing?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Bouleau .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bouleau, N. (2011). Daring the Abstract in Art. In: Risk and Meaning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17647-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics