Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group

USAB 2010: HCI in Work and Learning, Life and Leisure pp 82–100Cite as

A Small but Significant Difference – The Role of Gender on Acceptance of Medical Assistive Technologies

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6389))

Abstract

The current research aimed to study user diversity with a focus on gender differences in adoption of medical assistive technologies in general, and in particular. In order to understand the gender impact, we conducted two consecutive studies and considered gender as a key moderator of acceptance aspects in the medical context. The first study focused on general aspects of medical technology acceptability: users’ willingness to use it, the importance of privacy and trust as well as the general attitude across gender and specified age groups. For a deeper insight into this topic the second study was conducted in order to analyze gendered acceptance on specific health-related device. As results showed people’s general attitude towards medical technology and their willingness to use such medical assisting devices is throughout positive. However, gender differences emerge at the time when it comes to an assessment of a concrete medical tool (here smart textiles).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wittenberg, R., Comas-Herrera, A., Pickard, L., Hancock, R.: Future Demand for Long-Term Care in England. PSSRU Research Summary (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leonhardt, S.: Personal Healthcare Devices. In: Mukherjee, S., et al. (eds.) Malware: Hardware Technology Drivers of Ambient Intelligence, pp. 349–370. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Gaul, S., Ziefle, M., Arning, K., Wilkowska, W., Kasugai, K., Röcker, C., Jakobs, E.-M.: Technology Acceptance as an Integrative Component of Product Developments in the Medical Technology Sector. In: Proceedings of the Third Ambient Assisted Living Conference (AAL 2010), January 26 - 27. VDE Verlag, Berlin (2010), CD-ROM

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gaul, S., Ziefle, M.: Smart Home Technologies: Insights into Generation-Specific Acceptance Motives. In: Holzinger, A., Miesenberger, K. (eds.) USAB 2009. LNCS, vol. 5889, pp. 312–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Röcker, C.: Living and Working in Automated Environments - Evaluating the Concerns of End-Users in Technology-Enhanced Spaces. In: Mahadevan, V., Jianhong, Z. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International IEEE Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering, Singapore, February 26 - 28, pp. 513–517 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jähn, K., Nagel, E.: E-Health. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13, 319–337 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management Science 46, 186–204 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27, 425–478 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arning, K., Ziefle, M.: Different Perspectives on Technology Acceptance: The Role of Technology Type and Age. In: Holzinger, A., Miesenberger, K. (eds.) USAB 2009. LNCS, vol. 5889, pp. 20–41. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Ziefle, M.: Age perspectives on the usefulness on e-health applications. International Conference on Health Care Systems, Ergonomics, and Patient Safety (HEPS), Straßbourg, France (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer, S., Mollenkopf, H.: Home technology, smart homes, and the aging user. In: Schaie, K.W., Wahl, H.-W., Mollenkopf, H., Oswald, F. (eds.) Aging Independently: Living Arrangements and Mobility, pp. 148–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Demiris, G., Hensel, B.K., Skubic, M., Rantz, M.: Senior residents’ perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 24(1), 120–124 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stronge, A.J., Rogers, W.A., Fisk, A.D.J.: Human factors considerations in implementing telemedicine systems to accommodate older adults. Telemed Telecare 13, 1–3 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalloniatis, C., Kavakli, E., Gritzalis, S.: Using Privacy Process Patterns for Incorporating Privacy Requirements into the System Design Process. In: 2nd International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, pp. 1009–1017. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Sheridan, T.B.: Humans and Automation, vol. 3. John Wiley & Sons, Santa Monica (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Montague, E., Kleiner, B.M., Winchester, W.W.: Empirically Understanding Trust in Medical Technology. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39(4), 628–634 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Carmel, S.: The will to live: Gender differences among elderly patients. Social Sciences and Medicine 49, 1401–1408 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ditto, P.H., Smucker, W.D., Danks, J.H., Jacobson, J.A., Houts, R.M., Fagerlin, A., Coppola, K.M., Gready, R.M.: Stability of older adults’ preferences for life-sustaining medical treatment. Health Psychology 22, 606–615 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Arber, S., Vandrevala, T., Daly, T., Hampson, S.: Understanding gender differences in older people’s attitudes towards life-prolonging medical technologies. Journal of Aging Studies 22, 366–375 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Peplau, L.A., Bikson, T.K., Rook, K.S., Goodchilds, J.D.: Being old and living alone. In: Peplau, L.A., Perlman, D. (eds.) Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy, pp. 327–347. Wiley, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lehr, U.: Psychologie des Alterns, 9th edn. Quelle & Meyer, Wiebelsheim (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schumacher, P., Morahan-Martin, J.: Gender, internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior 17, 95–110 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Meelissen, M.R.M., Drent, M.: Gender differences in computer attitudes: Does the school matter? Computers in Human Behavior 24(3), 969–985 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Ackerman, P.L.: A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision Making Processes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 83(1), 33–60 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Morris, M.G., Venkatesh, V., Ackerman, P.L.: Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: an extension to the theory of planned behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 52(1), 69–84 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Beckmann, L., Kim, S., Jungbecker, N., Ingerl, G., Leonhardt, S.: Entwicklung intelligenter Textilien für die Überwachung des Ernährungs- und Wasserhaushalts. In: Deutscher AAL Kongress 2009, Berlin, vol. 2 (January 27-28, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M.: User diversity as a challenge for the integration of medical technology into future home environments. In: Ziefle, M., Röcker, C. (eds.) Human-Centred Design of eHealth Technologies. Concepts, Methods and Applications. Hershey, P.A. IGI Global (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ziefle, M., Wilkowska, W.: Technology acceptability for medical assistance. In: 4th Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare 2010, ICST 2010, Munic, Germany (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ziefle, M., Röcker, C.: Acceptance of Pervasive Healthcare Systems: A comparison of different implementation concepts. In: 4th ICST Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare 2010, User-Centred-Design of Pervasive Health Applications (UCD-PH 2010) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Gaul, S., Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M.: Accounting for user diversity in the acceptance of medical assistive technologies. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International ICST Conference on Electronic Healthcare for the 21st Century, eHealth 2010 (2010, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ziefle, M., Schaar, A.K.: Gender differences in attitudes towards invasive medical technology. Electronic Journal of Health Informatics (2010, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ziefle, M., Schaar, A.K.: Technical Expertise and its Influence on the Acceptance of Future Medical Technologies. What is influencing what to which extent? In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds.) HCI in Work & Learning, Life & Leisure, 6th Symposium of the WG HCI&UE of the Austrian Computer Society, USAB 2010, pp. 138–155 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Baltes, M.M., Freund, A.M., Horgas, A.L.: Men and women in the Berlin aging study. In: Baltes, P.B., Mayer, K.U. (eds.) The Berlin Aging Study. Aging from 70 to 100, pp. 259–281. Academic Press, Oxford (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Busch, T.: Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research 12, 147–158 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Brosnan, M.J.: The impact of computer anxiety and self-efficacy upon performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 14, 223–234 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Communication Science, Human Technology Centre (HumTec), RWTH Aachen University, Theaterplatz 14, 52056, Aachen, Germany

    Wiktoria Wilkowska, Sylvia Gaul & Martina Ziefle

Authors
  1. Wiktoria Wilkowska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sylvia Gaul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martina Ziefle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Informatics Systems Interactive Systems Research Group, Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt, Universitätsstraße 65-67, 9020, Klagenfurt, Austria

    Gerhard Leitner  & Martin Hitz  & 

  2. Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation (IMI), Research Unit HCI4MED, Medical University of Graz (MUG), Auenbruggerplatz 2/V, 8036, Graz, Austria

    Andreas Holzinger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wilkowska, W., Gaul, S., Ziefle, M. (2010). A Small but Significant Difference – The Role of Gender on Acceptance of Medical Assistive Technologies. In: Leitner, G., Hitz, M., Holzinger, A. (eds) HCI in Work and Learning, Life and Leisure. USAB 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6389. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16607-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16607-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16606-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16607-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation