Skip to main content

Interactive Techniques to Support Ontology Matching

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Schema Matching and Mapping

Part of the book series: Data-Centric Systems and Applications ((DCSA))

Abstract

There are many automatic approaches for generating matches between ontologies and schemas. However, these techniques are far from perfect and when the use case requires an accurate matching, humans must be involved in the process. Yet, involving the users in creating matchings presents its own problems. Users have trouble understanding the relationships between large ontologies and schemas and their concepts, remembering what they have looked at and executed, understanding output from the automatic algorithm, remembering why they performed an operation, reversing their decisions, and gathering evidence to support their decisions. Recently, researchers have been investigating these issues and developing tools to help users overcome these difficulties. In this chapter, we present some of the latest work related to human-guided ontology matching. Specifically, we discuss the cognitive difficulties users face with creating ontology matchings, the latest visual tools for assisting users with matching tasks, Web 2.0 approaches, common themes, challenges, and the next steps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/?mlanzenberger/OnAV10/.

  2. 2.

    http://protege.stanford.edu.

  3. 3.

    http://www.eclipse.org.

  4. 4.

    http://www.neon-project.org.

  5. 5.

    http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/optim/data-architect/.

  6. 6.

    http://www.altova.com/mapforce.html.

  7. 7.

    http://www.stylusstudio.com/xml_to_xml_mapper.html.

  8. 8.

    http://www.microsoft.com/biztalk/en/us/product-documentation.aspx.

  9. 9.

    http://bioportal.bioontology.org/.

  10. 10.

    http://oaei.ontologymatching.org.

References

  • Alexe et al. (2008) Muse: Mapping understanding and design by example. In: international conference on data engineering, Cancun, 7–12 April 2008, pp 10–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein PA, Melnik S (2007) Model management 2.0: Manipulating richer mappings. In: ACM special interest group on management of data (SIGMOD), Beijing, China, September 2007. ACM, NY, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein et al. (2006) Incremental schema matching. In: VLDB ’06: Proceedings of the 32nd international conference on very large databases, Seoul, Korea, September 2006. VLDB Endowment, pp 1167–1170

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke J (1996) Usability evaluation in industry. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland IL (eds) SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 184–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Coradeschi S, Saffiotti A (2006) Symbiotic robotic systems: Humans, robots, and smart environments. IEEE Intell Syst 21(3):82–84. doi:http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.59

    Google Scholar 

  • Correndo et al. (2008a) Collaborative support for community data sharing. In: 2nd workshop on collective intelligence in semantic web and social networks, Sydney, Australia, 12 December 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Correndo et al. (2008b) A community based approach for managing ontology alignments. In: Ontology matching workshop, Karlsruhe, Germany, 26–30 October 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Crubézy M, Musen MA (2003) Ontologies in support of problem solving. In: Staab S, Studer R (eds) Handbook on ontologies. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 321–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Do HH (2006) Schema matching and mapping-based data integration. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Universität Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Euzénat J (2006) An API for ontology alignment (version 2.1). http://gforge.inria.fr/docman/view.php/117/251/align.pdf

  • Euzénat et al. (2004a) Ontology alignment with OLA. In: Proceedings of the 3rd evaluation of ontologies for the web (EON) workshop. CEUR-WS, pp 59–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Euzénat et al. (2004b) State of the art on ontology alignment. deliverable d2.2.3. Tech. Rep. IST Knowledge Web NoE

    Google Scholar 

  • Euzénat et al. (2009) Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2009. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Ontology Matching (OM-2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer SM (2009) Cognitive support for semi-automatic ontology mapping. PhD thesis, University of Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer SM, Noy NF, Storey MA (2006) Towards understanding the needs of cognitive support for ontology mapping. In: International workshop on ontology matching at ISWC-2006, Athens, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer SM, Storey MA (2007a) Cognitive support for human-guided mapping systems. Tech. Rep. DCS-318-IR, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer SM, Storey MA (2007b) A cognitive support framework for ontology mapping. In: Proceedings of international semantic web conference, Busan, Korea, November 2007. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 114–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrix P, Edberg A (2003) Evaluation of ontology merging tools in bioinformatics. In: Proceedings pacific symposium on biocomputing, pp 589–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzenberger M, Sampson J (2006) Alviz – a tool for visual ontology alignment. In: Proceedings of the conference on information visualization (IV), London, July 2006. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 430–440. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IV.2006.18

  • Le Duc et al. (2008) Matching ontologies for context: The neon alignment plug-in. Tech. Rep. Deliverable 3.3.2, IST NeOn IP, NeOn. ftp://ftp.inrialpes.fr/pub/exmo/reports/neon-332.pdf

  • Löwgren J (1994) Human-computer interaction. What every system developer should know. Chartwell-Bratt, England

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness et al. (2000) The chimaera ontology environment. In: Proceedings of the 17th national conference on artificial intelligence and 12th conference on innovative applications of artificial intelligence, Austin, TX, 30 July–3 August 2000. AAAI, CA, pp 1123–1124

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller et al. (2001) The clio project: Managing heterogeneity. SIGMOD Record 30(1):78–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NE08 (2008) Neon wiki. http://www.neon-toolkit.org/wiki/index.php

  • NLP (2002) An introduction to NLP. http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/∼pxc/nlpa/2002/AI-HO-IntroNLP.html, http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/∼pxc/nlpa/2002/AI-HO-IntroNLP.html

  • Noy NF, Musen MA (2002) Evaluating ontology-mapping tools: Requirements and experience. In: Proceedings of OntoWeb-SIG3 workshop, Siguenza, Spain, October 2002, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy NF, Musen MA (2003) The PROMPT suite: Interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. Int J Hum Comput Stud 59(6):983–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noy et al. (2008) Collecting community-based mappings in an ontology repository. Tech. Rep. BMIR-2008-1310, Stanford Center For Biomedical Informatics Research

    Google Scholar 

  • PPP (2006) Performance, Parsing and Pragmatics. http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/marco/∖newline Principles of Linguistics Handout2006-2007.htm

  • Robert McCann et al. (2008) Matching schemas in online communities: A web 2.0 approach. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE 24th international conference on data engineering. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 110–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson et al. (2005) Visualization of mappings between schemas. In: CHI ’05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Portland, OR, April 2005. ACM, NY, pp 431–439. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1054972.1055032

  • Shvaiko P, Euzénat J (2008) Ten challenges for ontology matching. In: ODBASE, Monterrey, Mexico, November 2008. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1164–1182

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckenschmidt et al. (2009) Modular ontologies – Concepts, theories, and techniques for knowledge modularization. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yamauchi T (2007) The semantic web and human inference: A lesson from cognitive science. In: Proceedings of ISWC/ASWC, Busan, Korea, 13 November 2007. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 609–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhdanova AV (2005) Towards a community-driven ontology matching. In: K-CAP ’05, Banff, AB, Canada, October 2005. ACM, NY, pp 221–222. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1088622.1088678

  • http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/projects/criollo/ (2009). Website on Clio and schema management

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean M. Falconer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Falconer, S.M., Noy, N.F. (2011). Interactive Techniques to Support Ontology Matching. In: Bellahsene, Z., Bonifati, A., Rahm, E. (eds) Schema Matching and Mapping. Data-Centric Systems and Applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16518-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16518-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16517-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16518-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics