Abstract
There are many automatic approaches for generating matches between ontologies and schemas. However, these techniques are far from perfect and when the use case requires an accurate matching, humans must be involved in the process. Yet, involving the users in creating matchings presents its own problems. Users have trouble understanding the relationships between large ontologies and schemas and their concepts, remembering what they have looked at and executed, understanding output from the automatic algorithm, remembering why they performed an operation, reversing their decisions, and gathering evidence to support their decisions. Recently, researchers have been investigating these issues and developing tools to help users overcome these difficulties. In this chapter, we present some of the latest work related to human-guided ontology matching. Specifically, we discuss the cognitive difficulties users face with creating ontology matchings, the latest visual tools for assisting users with matching tasks, Web 2.0 approaches, common themes, challenges, and the next steps.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
References
Alexe et al. (2008) Muse: Mapping understanding and design by example. In: international conference on data engineering, Cancun, 7–12 April 2008, pp 10–19
Bernstein PA, Melnik S (2007) Model management 2.0: Manipulating richer mappings. In: ACM special interest group on management of data (SIGMOD), Beijing, China, September 2007. ACM, NY, pp 1–12
Bernstein et al. (2006) Incremental schema matching. In: VLDB ’06: Proceedings of the 32nd international conference on very large databases, Seoul, Korea, September 2006. VLDB Endowment, pp 1167–1170
Brooke J (1996) Usability evaluation in industry. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland IL (eds) SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 184–194
Coradeschi S, Saffiotti A (2006) Symbiotic robotic systems: Humans, robots, and smart environments. IEEE Intell Syst 21(3):82–84. doi:http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.59
Correndo et al. (2008a) Collaborative support for community data sharing. In: 2nd workshop on collective intelligence in semantic web and social networks, Sydney, Australia, 12 December 2008
Correndo et al. (2008b) A community based approach for managing ontology alignments. In: Ontology matching workshop, Karlsruhe, Germany, 26–30 October 2008
Crubézy M, Musen MA (2003) Ontologies in support of problem solving. In: Staab S, Studer R (eds) Handbook on ontologies. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 321–342
Do HH (2006) Schema matching and mapping-based data integration. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Universität Leipzig
Euzénat J (2006) An API for ontology alignment (version 2.1). http://gforge.inria.fr/docman/view.php/117/251/align.pdf
Euzénat et al. (2004a) Ontology alignment with OLA. In: Proceedings of the 3rd evaluation of ontologies for the web (EON) workshop. CEUR-WS, pp 59–68
Euzénat et al. (2004b) State of the art on ontology alignment. deliverable d2.2.3. Tech. Rep. IST Knowledge Web NoE
Euzénat et al. (2009) Results of the ontology alignment evaluation initiative 2009. In: Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Ontology Matching (OM-2009)
Falconer SM (2009) Cognitive support for semi-automatic ontology mapping. PhD thesis, University of Victoria
Falconer SM, Noy NF, Storey MA (2006) Towards understanding the needs of cognitive support for ontology mapping. In: International workshop on ontology matching at ISWC-2006, Athens, GA
Falconer SM, Storey MA (2007a) Cognitive support for human-guided mapping systems. Tech. Rep. DCS-318-IR, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
Falconer SM, Storey MA (2007b) A cognitive support framework for ontology mapping. In: Proceedings of international semantic web conference, Busan, Korea, November 2007. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 114–127
Lambrix P, Edberg A (2003) Evaluation of ontology merging tools in bioinformatics. In: Proceedings pacific symposium on biocomputing, pp 589–600
Lanzenberger M, Sampson J (2006) Alviz – a tool for visual ontology alignment. In: Proceedings of the conference on information visualization (IV), London, July 2006. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 430–440. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IV.2006.18
Le Duc et al. (2008) Matching ontologies for context: The neon alignment plug-in. Tech. Rep. Deliverable 3.3.2, IST NeOn IP, NeOn. ftp://ftp.inrialpes.fr/pub/exmo/reports/neon-332.pdf
Löwgren J (1994) Human-computer interaction. What every system developer should know. Chartwell-Bratt, England
McGuinness et al. (2000) The chimaera ontology environment. In: Proceedings of the 17th national conference on artificial intelligence and 12th conference on innovative applications of artificial intelligence, Austin, TX, 30 July–3 August 2000. AAAI, CA, pp 1123–1124
Miller et al. (2001) The clio project: Managing heterogeneity. SIGMOD Record 30(1):78–83
NE08 (2008) Neon wiki. http://www.neon-toolkit.org/wiki/index.php
NLP (2002) An introduction to NLP. http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/∼pxc/nlpa/2002/AI-HO-IntroNLP.html, http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/∼pxc/nlpa/2002/AI-HO-IntroNLP.html
Noy NF, Musen MA (2002) Evaluating ontology-mapping tools: Requirements and experience. In: Proceedings of OntoWeb-SIG3 workshop, Siguenza, Spain, October 2002, pp 1–14
Noy NF, Musen MA (2003) The PROMPT suite: Interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. Int J Hum Comput Stud 59(6):983–1024
Noy et al. (2008) Collecting community-based mappings in an ontology repository. Tech. Rep. BMIR-2008-1310, Stanford Center For Biomedical Informatics Research
PPP (2006) Performance, Parsing and Pragmatics. http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/marco/∖newline Principles of Linguistics Handout2006-2007.htm
Robert McCann et al. (2008) Matching schemas in online communities: A web 2.0 approach. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE 24th international conference on data engineering. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 110–119
Robertson et al. (2005) Visualization of mappings between schemas. In: CHI ’05: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Portland, OR, April 2005. ACM, NY, pp 431–439. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1054972.1055032
Shvaiko P, Euzénat J (2008) Ten challenges for ontology matching. In: ODBASE, Monterrey, Mexico, November 2008. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1164–1182
Stuckenschmidt et al. (2009) Modular ontologies – Concepts, theories, and techniques for knowledge modularization. Springer, Heidelberg
Yamauchi T (2007) The semantic web and human inference: A lesson from cognitive science. In: Proceedings of ISWC/ASWC, Busan, Korea, 13 November 2007. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 609–622
Zhdanova AV (2005) Towards a community-driven ontology matching. In: K-CAP ’05, Banff, AB, Canada, October 2005. ACM, NY, pp 221–222. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1088622.1088678
http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/projects/criollo/ (2009). Website on Clio and schema management
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Falconer, S.M., Noy, N.F. (2011). Interactive Techniques to Support Ontology Matching. In: Bellahsene, Z., Bonifati, A., Rahm, E. (eds) Schema Matching and Mapping. Data-Centric Systems and Applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16518-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16518-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16517-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16518-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)