Skip to main content

A Composite Calculation for Author Activity in Wikis: Accuracy Needed

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2009/2010

Abstract

Researchers of computer science and social science are increasingly interested in the Social Web and its applications. To improve existing infrastructures, to evaluate the success of available services, and to build new virtual communities and their applications, an understanding of dynamics and evolution of inherent social and informational structures is essential. One key question is how communities which exist in these applications are structured in terms of author contributions. Are there similar contribution patterns in different applications? For example, does the so called onion model revealed from open source software communities apply to Social Web applications as well? In this study, author contributions in the open content project Wikipedia are investigated. Previous studies to evaluate author contributions mainly concentrate on editing activities. Extending this approach, the added significant content and investigation of which author groups contribute the majority of content in terms of activity and significance are considered. Furthermore, the social information space is described by a dynamic collaboration network and the topic coverage of authors is analyzed. In contrast to existing approaches, the position of an author in a social network is incorporated. Finally, a new composite calculation to evaluate author contributions in Wikis is proposed. The action, the content contribution, and the connectedness of an author are integrated into one equation in order to evaluate author activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Thomas Adler, Luca de Alfaro, Ian Pye, and Vishwanath Raman. MeasuringAuthor Contributions to the Wikipedia. Technical report, School of Engineering, University of California, May 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Robert P. Biuk-Aghai. Visualizing Co-Authorship Networks in Online Wikipedia.Communications and Information Technologies, 2006. ISCIT ’06. International Symposium on, pages 737–742, 18 2006-Sept. 20 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Luciana Buriol, Carlos Castillo, Debora Donato, Stefano Leonardi, and StefanoMillozzi. Temporal Analysis of the Wikigraph. In Proceedings of the Web Intelligence Conference (WI 2006), pages 45–51, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, December 2006. IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yochai Benkler. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kathleen M. Carley. Dynamic Network Analysis. In Ronald Brelger, Kathleen Carley, and Philippa Pattison, editors, Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers, pages 133–145. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kevin Crowston and James Howison. The social structure of open source softwaredevelopment teams. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, Seattle, WA (USA), February 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Capocci, V.D.P. Servedio, F. Colaiori, L.S. Buriol, D. Donato, S. Leonardi, and G. Caldarelli. Preferential attachment in the growth of social networks: the case ofWikipedia. Physical Review E, 74:036116–1–6, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Linton C. Freeman. A set of measures of centrality based on betweeness. Sociometry, 40:35–40, 1977.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Peter A. Gloor, Rob Laubacher, Yan Zhao, and Scott B.C. Dyne. Temporal Visualizationand Analysis of Social Networks. Technical report, MIT, Center for Coordination Science, Cambridge, MA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. James Hendler, Nigel Shadbolt, Wendy Hall, Tim Berners-Lee, and DanielWeitzner. Web science: an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the web. Commun. ACM, 51(7):60–69, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Kittur, E. H. Chi, B. A. Pendleton, B. Suh, and T. Mytkowicz. Power of the fewvs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. In 25th Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2007), San Jose, CA., 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  12. James Moody, Daniel McFarland, and Skye Bender-deMoll. Dynamic Network Visualization. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4):1206–1241, January 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jakob Nielsen. Participation Inequality: Encouraging More Users to Contribute.URL: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html , 2006.

  14. Felipe Ortega and Jesus M. Gonzalez Barahona. Quantitative analysis of thewikipedia community of users. In WikiSym ’07: Proceedings of the 2007 international symposium on Wikis, pages 75–86, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Camille Roth, Dario Taraborelli, and Nigel Gilbert. Measuring wiki viability: Anempirical assessment of the social dynamics of a large sample of wikis. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium onWikis (WikiSym 2008). Porto, September 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bongwon Suh, E.H. Chi, B.A. Pendleton, and A. Kittur. Us vs. Them: UnderstandingSocial Dynamics in Wikipedia with Revert Graph Visualizations. Visual Analytics Science and Technology, 2007. VAST 2007. IEEE Symposium on, pages163–170, 30 2007-Nov. 1 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klaus Stein and Claudia Hess. Does it matter who contributes: a study on featuredarticles in the german wikipedia. In HT ’07: Proceedings of the eighteenth conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, pages 171–174, New York, NY, USA, 2007. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  18. SONIVIS. SONIVIS: Social networks in virtual information spaces. http://www.sonivis.org, 2009.

  19. Fernanda B. Viegas, Martin Wattenberg, Jesse Kriss, and Frank van Ham. Talk BeforeYou Type: Coordination in Wikipedia. In 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS), pages 78–78, Jan. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stanley Wasserman and Katherine Faust. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. MartinWattenberg, Fernanda Viégas, and Katherine Hollenbach. Visualizing Activityon Wikipedia with Chromograms. Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2007, pages 272–287, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  22. V. Zlatic, M. Bovzivcevic, H. Stefanvcic, and M. Domazet. Wikipedias: Collaborativeweb-based encyclopedias as complex networks. Physical Review E, 74, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Müller-Birn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Müller-Birn, C., Lehmann, J., Jeschke, S. (2011). A Composite Calculation for Author Activity in Wikis: Accuracy Needed. In: Jeschke, S., Isenhardt, I., Henning, K. (eds) Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2009/2010. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16208-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics