Abstract
Analogical reasoning has been investigated by philosophers and psychologists who have produced different approaches like “schema induction” (Gick and Holyoak) or the “structure-mapping theory” (Gentner).What is commonplace, however, is that analogical reasoning involves processes of matching and mapping. Apart from the differences that exist between these approaches, one important problem appears to be the lack of inferential precision with respect to these processes of matching and mapping. And this is all the more problematic, because analogical reasoning is widely conceived of as “inductive” reasoning. However, inductive reasoning - in a narrow and technical sense - is not creative, whereas analogical reasoning counts as an important source of human creativity. It is C. S. Peirce’s merit to have pointed to this fact and that induction can merely extrapolate and generalize something already at hand, but not the kind of reasoning that leads to new concepts. Indeed, inventive reasoning is usually identified with abduction, and consequently abduction should play at least some role in analogy. Peirce has claimed that analogy is a compound form of reasoning that integrates abduction and induction, but the intriguing question is still, how these two inferences are to be reconstructed precisely. In the proposed paper I hold that analogical reasoning can indeed be analyzed in this way and that this helps us to reach a much more precise and differentiated understanding of the forms and processes of analogical reasoning. In particular I hold that (at least) two forms of analogical reasoning have to be distinguished, because they represent different inferential paths. The underlying inferential processed will be explicated in detail and illustrated by various examples.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Minnameier, G.: Wissen und inferentielles Denken – Zur Analyse und Gestaltung von Lehr-Lern-Prozessen. Verlag Lang, Frankfurt/Main (2005)
Gick, M.L., Holyoak, K.J.: Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology 15, 1–38 (1983)
Holyoak, K.J., Thagard, P.R.: A computational model of analogical problem solving. In: Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A. (eds.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, pp. 242–266. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)
Holyoak, K.J., Thagard, P.R.: Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. Bradford, Cambridge (1995)
Gentner, D.: Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7, 155–170 (1983)
Gentner, D.: The mechanisms of analogical learning. In: Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A. (eds.) Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, pp. 199–241. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989)
Gentner, D., Markman, A.B.: Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist 52, 45–56 (1997)
Gentner, D., Bowdle, B., Wolff, P., Boronat, C.: Metaphor is like analogy. In: Gentner, D., Holyoak, K.J., Kokinov, B.N. (eds.) The Analogical Mind – Perspectives from Cognitive Science, pp. 199–253. Bradford, Cambridge (2001)
Duncker, K.: A comparative (experimental and theoretical) study of productive thinking (solving of comprehensible problems). Journal of Genetic Psychology 33, 642–708 (1926)
Gentner, D.: Analogy in scientific discovery: The case of Johannes Kepler. In: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J. (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values, pp. 21–39. KluwerAcademic/Plenum Publishers, New York (2002)
Minnameier, G.: The logicality of abduction, deduction, and induction. In: Bergman, M., Paavola, S., Pietarinen, A.-V., Rydenfelt, H. (eds.): Applying Peirce (forthcoming)
Magnani, L.: Abductive Cognition: The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning. Springer, Berlin (2009)
Schurz, G.: Patterns of abduction. Synthese 164, 201–324 (2008)
Minnameier, G.: Peirce-suit of truth – why inference to the best explanation and abduction ought not to be confused. Erkenntnis 60, 75–105 (2004)
Goodman, N.: Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1955)
Peirce, C.S.: Lectures on pragmatism. In: [28], vol. V, pp. 11–131 (1903)
Peirce, C.S.: Lessons from the history of science. In: [28], vol. I, pp. 19–49 (1896)
Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J.: A Practical Logic of Cognitive Systems. The Reach of Abduction – Insight and Trial, vol. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)
Peirce, C.S.: The grammatical theory of judgment and inference. In: [28], vol. II, pp. 265–269 (1893)
Gentner, D., Brem, S., Ferguson, R.W., Markman, A.B., Levidow, B.B., Wolff, P., Forbus, K.D.: Analogical reasoning and conceptual change: A case study of Johannes Kepler. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 6, 3–40 (1997)
Holyoak, K.J.: Analogy. In: Holyoak, K.J., Morrison, R.G. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, pp. 117–142. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)
Richland, L.E., Morrison, R.G., Holyoak, K.J.: Children’s development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 94, 249–273 (2006)
Craig, D.L., Nersessian, N.J., Catrambone, R.: Perceptual simulation in analogical problem solving. In: Magnani, L., Nersessian, N.J. (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning: Science, Technology, Values, pp. 167–189. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York (2002)
Gick, M.L., Holyoak, K.J.: Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology 12, 306–335 (1980)
Peirce, C.S.: To Paul Carus, on illustrations of the logic of science. In: [28], vol. VIII, pp. 171–179 (1910)
Meyer, M.: Abduktion, Induktion – Konfusion. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 12, 302–320 (2009)
Ward, C., Gimbel, S.: Retroductive analogy: How to and how not to make claims of good reasons to believe in evolutionary and anti-evolutionary hypotheses. Argumentation 24, 71–84 (2010)
Peirce, C.S.: Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Ed. by C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (vol. 1-6) and A. Burks (vol. 7-8). Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1958)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Minnameier, G. (2010). Abduction, Induction, and Analogy. In: Magnani, L., Carnielli, W., Pizzi, C. (eds) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 314. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15223-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15223-8_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15222-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15223-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)