Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Die chirurgische Naht

  • Chapter
Praxis der Viszeralchirurgie. Gastroenterologische Chirurgie

  • 5650 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Seit Einführung der chirurgischen Naht wurde das Fadenmaterial bis heute stetig weiterentwickelt. Die natürlichen Materialien wurden weitgehend durch die synthetischen Fäden ersetzt, die durchwegs bessere Eigenschaften besitzen. In der gastrointestinalen Chirurgie haben sich resorbierbare Fäden durchgesetzt. Dabei ermöglichen monofile, resorbierbare Fäden, die doppelt armiert sind, die sichere und kostengünstigste Form der fortlaufend genähten, extramukösen Darmanastomose auf Stoß. Nur technisch schwierige Anastomosen am Ösophagus oder transanal am Dickdarm, bei denen die Nähte vorgelegt werden, müssen in Einzelknopfnahttechnik genäht werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

13.1.10 Literatur

  • Allgöwer M, Hasse J, Herzog B (1971) Colonresektionen. Chirurg 42: 1–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bezwada RS, Jamiolkowski DD, Lee I-Y et al. (1995) Monocryl suture, a new ultra-pliable absorbable monofilament suture. Biomaterials 16:1141–1148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RP (1992) Knotting technique and suture materials. Br J Surg 79:399–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung (2006) Triclosan nur im ärztlichen Bereich anwenden, um Resistenzbildungen vorzubeugen

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuanchuen R, Beinlich K, Hoang TT, Becher A, Karkhoff-Schweizer RR, Schweizer HP (2001) Cross-resistance between triclosan and antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is mediated by multidrug efflux pumps: exposure of a susceptible mutant strain to triclosan selects nfxB mutants overexpressing MexCD-Opr. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:428–432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Debus ES, Geiger D, Sailer M et al. (1997) Physical, biological and handling characteristics of surgical suture material: A comparison of four different multifilament absorbable sutures. Eur Surg Res 29:52–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demartines N, Rothenbühler JM, Chevalley JP et al. (1991) The singlelayer continuous suture for gastric anastomosis. World J Surg 15(4):522–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Demartines N, von Flüe M, Harder F (1998) Neuer Analretraktor für handgenähte coloanale Anastomosen. Chirurg 69:1376–1377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg CB, Davidson EB, Bellmer DD et al. (2004) Evaluation of the tensile strengths of four monofilament absorbable suture materials after immersion in canine urine with or without bacteria. Am J Vet Res 65:847–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald D, Shumway S, Albear P et al. (1994) Mechanical comparison of 10 suture materials before and after in vivo incubation. J Surg Research 56:372–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harder F, Kull C (1987) Fortlaufende einreihige Darmanastomose. Chirurg 58:269–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann JB, Woodward SC, Pulaski EJ (1964) Healing of colonic anastomosis in the rat. Surg Gynecol Obstet 119:269–275

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herzog B (1974) Aktuelle Probleme in der Chirurgie, Bd. XX: Die Darmnaht. Huber, Bern Stuttgart Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmlund DEW (1974) Knot properties of surgical suture material. Acta Chir Scand 140:355–362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Israelsson LA, Jonsson T (1994) Physical properties of self locking and conventional surgical knots. Eur J Surg 160:323–327

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson A, Young D, Reilly Jv (2006) Caesarean section surgical site infection surveillance. J Hosp Infect 64(1):30–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Justinger C, Moussavian MR, Schlueter C, Kopp B, Kollmar O, Schilling M (2009) Antibacterial coating of abdominal closure sutures and wound infection. Surgery 145(3):330–34, Erratum 146(3):468. Comment 147(3):464–465; author reply 465–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katz AR, Turner RJ (1970) Evaluation of tensile and absorption properties of polyglycolic acid sutures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 131:701–716

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Max E, Sweeney WB, Bailey HR et al. (1991) Results of 1,000 singlelayer continuous polypropylene intestinal anastomoses. Am J Surg 162(5):461–467

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald ML, Farnell MB, Nagorney DM et al. (1995) Benign biliary strictures: repair and outcome with a contemporary approach. Surgery 118(4):582–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mingmalairak C, Ungbhakorn P, Paocharoen V (2009) Efficacy of antimicrobial coating suture coated polyglactin 910 with tricosan (Vicryl plus) compared with polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in reduced surgical site infection of appendicitis, double blind randomized control trial, preliminary safety report. J Med Assoc Thai 92(6): 770–775

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muftuoglu MA, Ozkan E, Saglam A (2004) Effect of human pancreatic juice and bile on the tensile strength of suture materials. Am J Surg 188:200–203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nockemann PF (1980) Die chirurgische Naht, 3. Aufl. Thieme, Stuttgart New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Papp AA, Alhava EM (2003) Sauna-bathing with sutures. A prospective and randomised study. Scand J Surg 92:175–177

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parell GJ, Becker GD (2003) Comparison of absorbable with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds. Arch Facial Plast Surg 5:488–490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Postlethwait RW (1970) Long-term comparative study of nonabsorbable sutures. Ann Surg 171:892–898

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodeheaver GT, Beltran KA, Green CW et al. (1996) Biomechanical and clinical performance of a new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture. J Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants 6:181–198

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Semjonow A, Brandt M, Reul H et al. (1993) Knotenoberfläche und Knotenzugfestigkeit von Polypropylen Monofilamenten. Biomed Technik 38:21–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Setzen G, Williams EF (1997) Tissue response to suture materials implanted subcutaneously in a rabbit model. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1788–1795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shimi SM, Lirici M, Vander Velpen G et al. (1994) Comparative study of the holding strength of slipknots using absorbable and nonabsorbable ligature materials. Surg Endosc 8:1285–1291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smit IB, Witte E, Brand R et al. (1991) Tissue reaction to suture materials revisited: Is there argument to change our views? Eur Surg Res 23:347–354

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Storch M, Scalzo H, Van Lue S, Jacinto G (2002) Physical and functional comparison of coated VICRYL* plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with coated VICRYL* Suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture). Surg Infect (Larchmt) 3 (Suppl 1): S65–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sulamanidze M (2007) Evaluation of a novel technique for wound closure using a barbed suture. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(1):349–350; author reply 350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thiede A, Geiger D, Dietz UA et al. (1998) Overview on compression anastomoses: biofragmentable anastomosis ring multicenter prospective trial of 1666 anastomoses. World J Surg 22:78–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trimbos JB, Niggebrugge A, Trimbos R et al. (1995) Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: Poliglecaprone 25 (Moncryl). Eur J Surg 161:319–322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Welsch TT, Gillock ET (2011) Triclosan-resistant bacteria isolated from feedlot and residential soils. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 46(4):436–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

13.2.6 Literatur

  • Böttcher K, Feussner H, Dittler HJ, Etter M, Roder JD, Siewert JR (1998) Laparoskopische Resektion von Magenwandtumoren. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II (Kongressband) 1637

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung RS (1987) Blood flow in colonic anastomoses. Effect of stapling and suturing. Ann Surg 206:335–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dziki AJ, Duncan MD, Harmon JW (1991) Advantages of handsewn over stapled bowel anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 34:442–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Everett WG, Friend PJ, Forty J (1986) Comparison of stapling and hand suture for left-sided large bowel anastomosis. Br J Surg 73:345–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haalböök O, Johannson K, Sjodahl R (1996) Laser Doppler blood flow measurement in rectal resection for carcinoma – comparison between the straight and colonic J pouch reconstruction. Br J Surg 83:389–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habu H, Kando F, Saito N, Sato Y, Takeshita K, Sunagawa M, Endo M (1989) Experience with the EEA stapler for esophagojejunostomy. Int Surg 74:73–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hölscher AH, Siewert JR (1992) Stapler am Gastrointestinaltrakt – pro und contra. Langenbecks Arch Chir 377:56–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Izbicki JR, Gawad KA, Quirrenbach S, Hosch SB, Breid V, Knoefel WT Küpper HU, Broelsch CE (1998) Ist die Klammernaht in der Visceralchirurgie noch gerechtfertigt? Eine prospektiv kontrollierte, randomisierte Studie zur Kosteneffektivität von Hand- und Klammernaht. Chirurg 69:725–734

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katai H, Sasako M, Sano T, Maruyama K (1997) Wedge resection of the stomach for gastric leiomyosarcoma. Br J Surg 84:560–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire J, Wright IC, Leverment JN (1997) Surgical staplers: a review. J R Coll Surg 42:1–9

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohgami M, Otani Y, Kumai K, Kubota T, Kim Y-I, Kitajima M (1999) Curative laparoscopic surgery for early gastric cancer: five years experience. World J Surg 23:187–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Omote K, Feussner H, Stein HJ, Ungeheuer A, Siewert JR (1999) Endoscopic stapling divertculostomy for Zenker´s diverticulum. Surg Endoscopy 13:535–538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chirurgische Klinik, Diakoniekrankenhaus Mannheim GmbH, Speyerer Straße 91–93, 68163, Mannheim

    Prof. Dr. med. K. A. Böttcher

  2. Klinik für Chirurgie, Kantonsspital Aarau AG, Tellstrasse, 5000, Aarau, Schweiz

    Prof. Dr. med. W. R. Marti MBA (Leiter Bereich Chirurgie, Chefarzt)

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. med. K. A. Böttcher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. med. W. R. Marti MBA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120, Heidelberg

    Jörg Rüdiger Siewert (Leitender Ärztlicher Direktor und Vorstandsvorsitzender) (Leitender Ärztlicher Direktor und Vorstandsvorsitzender)

  2. Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg

    Matthias Rothmund (Dekan) (Dekan)

  3. Universitätsklinik Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen

    Volker Schumpelick (Direktor der Chirurgischen) (Direktor der Chirurgischen)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Böttcher, K.A., Marti, W.R. (2011). Die chirurgische Naht. In: Siewert, J.R., Rothmund, M., Schumpelick, V. (eds) Praxis der Viszeralchirurgie. Gastroenterologische Chirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14223-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14223-9_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14222-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14223-9

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation