Abstract
Iterative prototyping helps designers refine their ideas and discover previously unknown issues and opportunities. However, the time constraints of production schedules can discourage iteration in favor of realization. Is this tradeoff prudent? This paper investigates if – under tight time constraints – iterating multiple times provides more benefit than a single iteration. A between-subjects study manipulates participants’ ability to iterate on a design task. Participants in the iteration condition outperformed those in the non-iteration condition. Participants with prior experience with the task performed better. Notably, participants in the iteration condition without prior task experience performed as well as non-iterating participants with prior task experience.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aronson, J.M. Improving academic achievement. Academic, 2002.
Athavankar, U.A. Mental imagery as a design tool. Cybernetics and Systems 28, 1 (1997), 25–42.
Austin, R., and Devin, L. Artful Making: What Managers Need to Know About How Artists Work. Financial Times Press, 2003.
Ball, L.J., and Christensen, B.T. Analogical reasoning and mental simulation in design: two strategies linked to uncertainty resolution. Design Studies 30, 2 (2009), 169–186.
Bilda, Z., and Gero, J.S. The impact of working memory limitations on the design process during conceptualization. Design Studies 28, 4 (2007), 343–367.
de Bono, E. Six Thinking Hats. Back Bay Books, 1999.
Brown, T. Change By Design. HarperCollins, 2009.
Buchenau, M., and Suri, J.F. Experience prototyping. Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, ACM (2000), 424–433.
Buxton, B. Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. Morgan Kaufmann, 2007.
Christensen, B.T., and Schunn, C.D. The role and impact of mental simulation in design. Applied Cognitive Psychology 23, 3 (2009), 327–344.
Cross, N. Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer, 2006.
De Leon, D. Building Thought Into Things. European Conference on Cognitive Science, (1999), 37–47.
Dodgson, P., and Wood, J. Self-esteem and the cognitive accessibility of strengths and weaknesses after failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75, 1 (1998), 178–197.
Dweck, C. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Ballantine Books, 2007.
Dym, C.L., and Little, P. Engineering Design: A Project-Based Introduction. Wiley, 1999.
Erdogmus, H. The Economic Impact of Learning and Flexibility on Process Decisions. IEEE Software 22, 6 (2005), 76–83.
Ericsson, K.A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P.J., and Hoffman, R.R. The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Finke, R.A., and Slayton, K. Explorations of creative visual synthesis in mental imagery. Memory and Cognition 16, 3 (1988), 252–7.
Finke, R.A. Creative Imagery. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990.
Gentner, D., and Stevens, A.L. Mental models. 1983.
Gero, J.S., and Schnier, T. Evolving Representations Of Design Cases And Their Use In Creative Design. In J. S. Gero, M. L. Maher and F. Sudweeks (eds), Preprints Computational Models of Creative Design (1995), 343–368.
Goffman, E. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Northeastern, 1986.
Hartmann, B., Doorley, S., and Klemmer, S. Hacking, Mashing, Gluing: A Study of Opportunistic Design and Development. Pervasive Computing 7, 3 (2006), 46–54.
Hinds, P. The Curse of Expertise: The Effects of Expertise and Debiasing Methods on Predictions of Novice Performance. Journal of Experimental Applied Psychology 5, (1999), 205–221.
Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., and Kirsh, D. Distributed Cognition: Toward a New Foundation for Human-Computer Interaction Research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7, 2 (2000), 174–196.
Houde, S., and Hill, C. What do prototypes prototype? Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, (1997).
Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild. MIT, 1996.
Jansson, D., and Smith, S. Design Fixation. Design Studies 12, 1 (1991), 3–11.
Jones, JC. Design Methods. Wiley, 1992.
Karat, C. Cost-benefit analysis of usability engineering techniques. Human Factors Society, (1990), 839–843.
Kelley, T. The art of innovation. Profile Business, 2002.
Kershaw, T.C., and Ohlsson, S. Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: the case of the nine-dot problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30, 1 (2004), 3–13.
Kirsh, D., and Maglio, P. On Distinguishing Epistemic from Pragmatic Action. Cognitive Science 18, (1994), 513–549.
Kolko, J. Thoughts on Interaction Design. Brown Bear LLC, 2007.
Kolodner, J.L., and Wills, L.M. Powers of observation in creative design. Design Studies 17, 4 (1996), 385–416.
Larkin, J., and Simon, H. Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11, 1 (1987), 65–100.
Laurel, B. Design Research: Methods and Perspectives. MIT, 2003.
Lave, J. Cognition in Practice. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Lim, Y., Stolterman, E., and Tenenberg, J. The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 15, 2 (2008), 1–27.
Lim, Y., Pangam, A., Periyasami, S., and Aneja, S. Comparative analysis of high- and low-fidelity prototypes for more valid usability evaluations of mobile devices. Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles, ACM (2006), 291–300.
Maglio, P., Matlock, T., Raphaely, D., Chernicky, B., and Kirsh, D. Interactive Skill in Scrabble. Lawrence Erlbaum (1999).
Maglio, P.P., and Kirsh, D. Epistemic Action Increases With Skill. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 16, (1996), 391–396.
Martin, R.L. Creativity That Goes Deep. Business Week, 2005. http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/aug2005/di20050803_823317.htm.
Merholz, P., Wilkens, T., Schauer, B., and Verba, D. Subject To Change: Creating Great Products & Services for an Uncertain World: Adaptive Path on Design. O’Reilly Media, 2008.
Michalko, M. Thinkertoys: A Handbook of Creative-Thinking Techniques. Ten Speed Press, 2006.
Miller, G.A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63, 2 (1956), 81–97.
Osborn, A.F. Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving. Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1963.
Schon, D.A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Ashgate Publishing, 1995.
Schrage, M. Cultures of prototyping. In Bringing design to software book contents. 1996, 191–213.
Schrage, M. Serious Play: How the World’s Best Companies Simulate to Innovate. Harvard Business School Press, 1999.
Sutton, R., and Hargadon, A. Brainstorming groups in context: effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, (1996).
Suwa, M., Gero, J., and Purcell, T. Unexpected discoveries and S-invention of design requirements: Important vehicles for a design process. Design Studies 21, (2000), 539–567.
Suwa, M., and Tversky, B. External Representations Contribute to the Dynamic Construction of Ideas. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Diagrammatic Representation and Inference, Springer (2002), 341–343.
Thompson, L., Gentner, D., and Loewenstein, J. Avoiding Missed Opportunities in Managerial Life: Analogical Training More Powerful Than Individual Case Training. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82, 1 (2000), 60–75.
Torrance, E.P. Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Personnel Press, Ginn and Co., Xerox Education Co, 1974.
Warr, A., and O’Neill, E. Understanding design as a social creative process. Proceedings of the 5th conference on Creativity & Cognition, ACM (2005), 118–127.
Ylirisku, S., Halttunen, V., Nuojua, J., and Juustila, A. Framing design in the third paradigm. Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2009), 1131–1140.
Zhang, J., and Norman, D. Representations in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science 18, 1 (1994), 87–122.
Acknowledgements
The Hasso Plattner Design Thinking Research Program funded this research. We thank Björn Hartmann, Jeff Heer, Daniel Schwartz, Barbara Tversky, and Terry Winograd for helpful comments on early versions of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dow, S.P., Klemmer, S.R. (2011). The Efficacy of Prototyping Under Time Constraints. In: Meinel, C., Leifer, L., Plattner, H. (eds) Design Thinking. Understanding Innovation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13757-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13757-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13756-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13757-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)