Abstract
In special relativity, one often speaks of rigid rods, looking at them in one inertial frame or another and observing that they do not always have the same length, despite their rigidity. This paper is about what happens to the rod as it gets from one inertial frame to another, i.e., as it accelerates. The problem is not entirely academic. For those who would like to model extended charge distributions and their fields, and in particular the forces they exert upon themselves via these electromagnetic effects, when they are accelerating, some hypothesis must be made about the way the charge distribution shifts around in the relevant spatial hypersurfaces of Minkowski’s spacetime. A notion of rigidity is indeed usually applied and that is discussed here (Sect. 1), in connection with frames of reference adapted to accelerating observers in the spacetime of special relativity. The physical legitimacy of adapted frames of reference is discussed in some detail throughout the paper, but particularly in the context of the Pound–Rebka experiment in Sect. 1.10. The aim is to elucidate the roles of what are usually referred to as the clock and ruler hypotheses. One would also like to consider rigid motions of any material medium in a more general framework, even in the context of general relativity. The notion of rigidity can be extended (Sect. 2) in a simple but perhaps questionable way. The aim here will indeed be to cast a critical glance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
W. Rindler: Introduction to Special Relativity, Oxford University Press, New York (1982)
Full details of any missing calculations can be obtained from the author
M. Friedman: Foundations of Space–Time Theories, Princeton University Press, NJ (1983)
M. Blau: Lecture Notes on General Relativity, available on the Web
A.D. Yaghjian: Relativistic Dynamics of a Charged Sphere, Lecture Notes in Physics 686, Springer-Verlag, New York (2006)
E. Pierce: The lock and key paradox and the limits of rigidity in special relativity, Am. J. Phys. 75 (7), 610–614, 2007
S. Lyle: Uniformly Accelerating Charged Particles. A Threat to the Equivalence Principle, Fundamental Theories of Physics 158, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (2008a). See in particular Chap. 2
S. Lyle: Extending Bell’s Approach to General Relativity, unpublished (2008b)
H.R. Brown: Physical Relativity. Spacetime Structure from a Dynamical Perspective, Clarendon Press, Oxford (2007). For more discussion of this theme, see also: H.R. Brown: The behaviour of rods and clocks in general relativity, and the meaning of the metric field. In: Beyond Einstein: Essays on Geometry, Gravitation, and Cosmology, ed. by D.E. Rowe, Einstein Studies, Vol. 12, Birkhäuser, Boston (2009)
J.S. Bell: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, 2nd edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)
B. DeWitt: Lectures on Relativity, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg (to be published)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lyle, S.N. (2010). Rigidity and the Ruler Hypothesis. In: Petkov, V. (eds) Space, Time, and Spacetime. Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol 167. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13538-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13538-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13537-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13538-5
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)