Skip to main content

Evolution of Protein Wrapping and Implications for the Drug Designer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 497 Accesses

Abstract

Proteins with common ancestry (homologs) typically share a common fold. This structural similarity introduces major problems for rational drug design since a major goal in the field is the control of specificity. Yet, as shown in this chapter, while the topology of the native structure is extremely similar across homologs, their wrapping patterns and expression regulation tend to be different, offering a novel opportunity to funnel the impact of a drug on clinically relevant targets. The evolutionary root of these dissimilarities across homologous proteins is carefully dissected in this chapter both across species and within the human species. Furthermore, as hinted in this and demonstrated in subsequent chapters, the wrapping variations across homologs have profound consequences for drug design as we aim at engineering target-specific and species-specific therapeutic agents and build insightful animal models for disease or malignancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fernández A, Scott R, Berry RS (2004) The nonconserved wrapping of conserved folds reveals a trend towards increasing connectivity in proteomic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:2823–2827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernández A, Berry RS (2004) Molecular dimension explored in evolution to promote proteomic complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:13460–13465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lynch M, Conery JS (2003) The origins of genome complexity. Science 302:1401–1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kondrashov FA, Koonin EV (2004) A common framework for understanding the origin of genetic dominance and evolutionary fates of gene duplications. Trends Genet 20:287–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liang H, Rogale-Plazonic K, Chen J, Li WH, Fernández A (2008) Protein under-wrapping causes dosage sensitivity and decreases gene duplicability. PLoS Genet 4:e11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Papp B, Pal C, Hurst LD (2003) Dosage sensitivity and the evolution of gene families in yeast. Nature 424:194–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fernández A, Scheraga H (2003) Insufficiently dehydrated hydrogen bonds as determinants for protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bartel D (2009) MicroRNAs: Target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 136:215–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernández A (2004) Keeping dry and crossing membranes. Nat Biotechnol 22:1081–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Veitia RA (2002) Exploring the etiology of haploinsufficiency. Bioessays 24:175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Veitia RA (2004) Gene dosage balance: Deletions, duplications and dominance. Trends Genet 21: 33–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Su AI, Wiltshire T, Batalov S et al (2004) A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6062–6067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Birney E, Andrews D, Caccamo M et al (2006) Ensembl 2006. Nucleic Acids Res 34: D556–D561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang Z, Nielsen R (2000) Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol 17:32–43

    Google Scholar 

  15. Friedman RC, Farth KK, Burge CB, Bartel DP (2009) Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs. Genome Res 19:92–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lewis B, Burge C, Bartel D (2005) Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell 120:15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fernández A, Chen J (2009) Human capacitance to dosage imbalance: coping with inefficient selection. Genome Res 19:2185–2192

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grimson A, Farth KK, Johnston WK et al (2007) MicroRNA target specificity in mammals: Determinants beyond seed pairing. Mol Cell 27:91–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aloy P, Ceulemans H, Stark A, Russell RB (2003) The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. J Mol Biol 332:989–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gu Z, Nicolae D, Lu HH, Li W-H (2002) Rapid divergence in expression between duplicate genes inferred from microarray data. Trends Genet 18:609–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen F, Li W-H (2001) Genomic divergences between humans and other hominoids and the effective population size of the common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees. Am J Hum Genet 68:444–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gao L, Innan H (2004) Very low gene duplication rate in the yeast genome. Science 306: 1367–1370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Surmacz E, Bartucci M (2005) Role of estrogen receptor alpha in modulating IGF-I receptor signaling and function in breast cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 23:385–394

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ariel Fernandez .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fernandez, A. (2010). Evolution of Protein Wrapping and Implications for the Drug Designer. In: Transformative Concepts for Drug Design: Target Wrapping. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11792-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11792-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11791-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11792-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics