Skip to main content

Semantic Equivalence

  • Chapter
Image Fusion
  • 2953 Accesses

Abstract

The subject of this chapter is semantic equalization. This is the conversion of input data which does not refer to the same object or phenomena to a common object or phenomena. Different inputs can only be fused together if they refer to the same object or phenomena. In the case of image fusion we normally assume this to be the case if the images are captured by the same or similar type of camera. However, in the case of featuremap fusion, the featuremaps rarely refer to the same object or phenomena. In this case, fusion can only take place if the features maps are semantically equivalent. This is also true in the case of decision map fusion. In this chapter we shall therefore concentrate on the semantic equivalence of feature maps and decision maps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belongie, S., Malik, J., Puzicha, J.: Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 24, 509–522 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burdakov, O., Grimvall, A., Sysoev, O.: Data preordering in generalized PAV algorithm for monotonic regression. J. Comp. Math. 24, 771–790 (2006)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Gebel, M., Weihs, C.: Calibrating classifier scores into probabilities. Adv. Data Anal., 141–148 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fred, A.L.N.: Finding consistent clusters in data partitions. In: Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds.) MCS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2096, pp. 309–318. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Fred, A.L.N., Jain, A.K.: Combining multiple clusterings using evidence accumulation. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell. 27, 835–850 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuhn, H.W.: The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval Research Logistics 52, 7–21 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin, H.T., Lin, C.J., Weng, R.: A note on Platt’s probabilistic outputs for support vector machines. Mach. Learn. 68, 267–276 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Milgram, J., Cheriet, M., Sabourin, R.: Estimating accurate multi-class probabilities with support vector machines. In: Int. Joint Conf. Neural Networks (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Platt, J.: Probabilistic outputs for support vector machines and comparisons to regularized likelihood methods. In: Smola, A.J., Bartlett, P., Scholkopf, B., Schurmans, D. (eds.) Advances in Large Margin Classifiers, pp. 61–74. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ruping, S.: Robust probabilistic calibration. In: Fürnkranz, J., Scheffer, T., Spiliopoulou, M. (eds.) ECML 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4212, pp. 743–750. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Scott, C., Nowak, R.: Robust contour matching via the order preserving assignment problem. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15(9), 1831–1838 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Strehl, A., Ghosh, J.: Cluster ensembles - a knowledge reuse framework for combining multiple partitions. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 583–617 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, Z., Gao, C., Tian, J., Lia, J., Chen, X.: Multi-feature distance map based feature detection of small infra-red targets with small contrast in image sequences. In: Proc. SPIE, vol. 5985 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, X., Yang, C., You, J.: Spectral aggregation for clustering ensemble. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Patt. Recogn., pp. 1–4 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zadrozny, B., Elkan, C.: Transforming classifier scores into accurate multiclass probability estimates. In: Proc. Int. Conf. KDD (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mitchell, H.B. (2010). Semantic Equivalence. In: Image Fusion. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11216-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11216-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11215-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11216-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics