Skip to main content

Zusammenfassung

Es existieren im Wesentlichen 2 chirurgische Zugangswege zum Platzieren eines synthetischen Netzes zum Bruchpfortenverschluss im präperitonealen Raum. Der transabdominelle (TAPP = transabdominal präperitoneal) und der primär extraperitoneale Weg (TEP = total extraperitoneal). Beide laparoskopischen Techniken nutzen das Prinzip des spannungsfreien Hernienverschlusses durch Verschluss der Bruchpforte mittels alloplastischen Materials (Hernioplastik).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ramshaw BJ, Tucker JG, Duncan TD, Heithold D, Garcha I, Mason EM, Wilson JP, Lucas GW (1996) Technical considerations of the different approaches to laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: Analysis of 500 cases. Am Surg 62: 69–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kraehenbuehl L, Schaefer M, Feodorovici MA, Buechler MW (1998) Laparoscopic Hernia Surgery: A Overview. Dig Surg 15: 158–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stolzenburg JU, Pfeiffer H, Nehaus JM, Sommerfeld M, Dorschner W (2001) Repair of inguinal hernias using the mesh technique during extraperitoneal pelvic lymph node dissection. Urol Int 67: 19–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Dietel A, Do M, Pfeiffer H, Doschner W (2003) Hernia Repair During Endoscopic (Laparoscopic) Radical Prostatectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 13: 27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cowan W, Morgan HR (1979) A simplified retropubic urethropexy in the treatment of primary and recurrent urinary stress incontinence in the female. Amer J Obstet Gynecol 133: 295

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Petri E (1989) Die Kolposuspension zur Behandlung der weiblichen Harninkontinenz. Akt Urol 20: 138–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Richardson DA (1991) The evaluation of different surgical procedures. In: Ostergard DR, Bent AE (Hrsg.) Urogynecology and Urodynamics, 3rd ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, pp. 413–421

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wallwiener D, Grischke EM, Rimbach S, Maleika A, Kaufmann M, Bastert G (1995) Endoscopic colposuspension (Retziusscopy versus laparoscopy). An effective extension of the surgical spectrum of stress incontinence? Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 55: 235–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goepel M, Bross S (2009) Stress incontinence in women. Is there still an indication to perform the Burch colposuspension and the fascial sling. Der Urologe A 48: 487–90

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stolzenburg, JU., Türk, I.A., Liatsikos, E.N. (2011). Verschiedenes. In: Laparoskopische und roboterassistierte Chirurgie in der Urologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10379-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10379-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10378-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10379-7

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics