Skip to main content

Can Doxastic Agents Learn? On the Temporal Structure of Learning

  • Conference paper
Book cover Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5834))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Formal learning theory formalizes the phenomenon of language acquisition. The theory focuses on various properties of the process of conjecture-change over time, and therefore it is also applicable in philosophy of science, where it can be interpreted as a theory of empirical inquiry. Treating “conjectures” as beliefs, we link the process of conjecture-change to doxastic update. Using this approach, we reconstruct and analyze the temporal aspect of learning in the context of temporal and dynamic logics of belief change. We provide a translation of learning scenarios into the domain of dynamic doxastic epistemic logic. Then, we express the problem of finite identifiability as a problem of epistemic temporal logic model checking. Furthermore, we prove a doxastic epistemic temporal logic representation result corresponding to an important theorem from learning theory, that characterizes identifiability in the limit, namely Angluin’s theorem. In the end we discuss consequences and possible extensions of our work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angluin, D.: Inductive inference of formal languages from positive data. Information and Control 45(2), 117–135 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baltag, A., Moss, L.S., Solecki, S.: The logic of public announcements, common knowledge, and private suspicions. In: Proc. TARK 1998, pp. 43–56 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baltag, A., Smets, S.: Dynamic belief revision over multi-agent plausibility models. In: Bonanno, G., et al. (eds.) Proc. LOFT 2006, pp. 11–24 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van Benthem, J., Gerbrandy, J., Hoshi, T., Pacuit, E.: Merging frameworks for interaction. Journal of Philosophical Logic (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning About Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Gierasimczuk, N.: Bridging learning theory and dynamic epistemic logic. Synthese 169(2), 371–384 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Gold, E.: Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 10, 447–474 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lange, S., Wiehagen, R., Zeugmann, T.: Learning by erasing. In: Arikawa, S., Sharma, A.K. (eds.) ALT 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1160, pp. 228–241. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Mukouchi, Y.: Characterization of finite identification. In: Jantke, K.P. (ed.) AII 1992. LNCS, vol. 642, pp. 260–267. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Parikh, R., Ramanujam, R.: A knowledge based semantics of messages. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12(4), 453–467 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Meyden, R., Wong, K.-s.: Complete axiomatizations for reasoning about knowledge and branching time. Studia Logica 75(1), 93–123 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dégremont, C., Gierasimczuk, N. (2009). Can Doxastic Agents Learn? On the Temporal Structure of Learning. In: He, X., Horty, J., Pacuit, E. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5834. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04893-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04893-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04892-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04893-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics