Skip to main content

From the Logical Point of View: The Chain Store Paradox Revisited

  • Conference paper
Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5834))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 651 Accesses

Abstract

The standard approach to a rational action paradox in game theory (namely, the chain store paradox) has presupposed that the player’s beliefs are probabilities represented by functions with values between 0 and 1. However, a general solution must include the possibility that the subjective probabilities take only the values 1 and 0, requiring a non-Bayesian account of belief revision. In this paper, we propose a situation-theoretic diagnosis and solution to the paradox, based on the conception of Austinian propositions relativized to particular situations, as developed by Barwise and Etchemendy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barwise, J., Etchemendy, J.: The Liar. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bicchieri, C.: Common knowledge and backward induction:A solution to the paradox. In: Varid, M. (ed.) Proceedings of the second conference on theoretical aspects of reasoning about knowledge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Koons, R.C.: Paradox(es) of belief and strategic rationality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Reny, P.: Rationality, common knowledge and the theory of games. Unpblished Manuscript, University of Western Ontario, Dept of Economics (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kreps, D.M., Wilson, R.: Reputation and imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory 27, 253–279 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Selten, R.: The chainstore paradox. Theory and decision 9(2), 127–159

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sorensen, R.A.: Blindspots. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1988)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, L., Koons, R.C., Zhang, J. (2009). From the Logical Point of View: The Chain Store Paradox Revisited. In: He, X., Horty, J., Pacuit, E. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5834. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04893-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04893-7_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04892-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04893-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics