Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Semantic Web Languages

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Semantic Web Information Management

Abstract

The Semantic Web is basically an extension of the Web and of the Web-enabling database and Internet technology, and, as a consequence, the Semantic Web methodologies, representation mechanisms and logics strongly rely on those developed in databases. This is the motivation for many attempts to, more or less loosely, merge the two worlds like, for instance, the various proposals to use relational technology for storing web data or the use of ontologies for data integration. This chapter comes after one on data management, in order to first complete the picture with the description of the languages that can be used to represent information on the Semantic Web, and then highlight a few fundamental differences which make the database and Semantic Web paradigms complementary, but somehow difficult to integrate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amarel, S.: On representations of problems of reasoning about actions. In: Machine Intelligence 3, pp. 131–171. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Beckett, D.: RDF/XML Syntax Specification (Revised). Technical Report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Recommendation, February 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bechhofer, S., Harmelen, F.V., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Stein, L.A.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. Technical Report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Recommendation, February 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berners-Lee, T.: Weaving the Web. Orion Business Books (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J.A., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Sci Am. J. 284(5), 34–43 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bouquet, P., Giunchiglia, F., Harmelen, F.V., Serafini, L., Stuckenschmidt, H.: C-OWL: Contextualizing ontologies. In: International Semantic Web Conference, pp. 164–179 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bray, T., Paoli, J., Sperberg-McQueen, C.M., Maler, E., Yergeau, F.: Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition). Technical Report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Recommendation, February 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brickley, D., Guha, R.V.: RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema. Technical Report, World WideWeb Consortium (W3C), Recommendation, February 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carroll, J.J., Roo, J.D.: OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases. Technical Report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Recommendation, February 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ceri, S., Gottlob, G., Tanca, L.: Logic Programming and Databases. Springer, Berlin (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Donini, F.M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Schaerf, A., Nutt, W.: Adding epistemic operators to concept languages. In: 3th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’92), Cambridge, MA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fallside, D.C., Walmsley, P.: XML Schema Part 0: Primer Second Edition. Technical Report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Recommendation, October 28 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Giunchiglia, F., Marchese, M., Zaihrayeu, I.: Encoding classifications into lightweight ontologies. In: Journal on Data Semantics VIII. LNCS, vol. 4380, pp. 57–81. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., Yatskevich, M.: Discovering missing background knowledge in onology matching. In: Proceedings: 17th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pp. 382–386 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Giunchiglia, F., Dutta, B., Maltese, V.: Faceted lightweight ontologies. In: Borgida, A., Chaudhri, V., Giorgini, P., Yu, E. (eds.) Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications. LNCS, vol. 5600. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Giunchiglia, F., Zaihrayeu, I.: Lightweight ontologies. In: The Encyclopedia of Database Systems. Springer, Berlin (2008, to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Grant, J., Beckett, D.: RDF Test Cases. Technical Report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Recommendation, February 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guarino, N., Giaretta, P.: Ontologies and knowledge bases: towards a terminological clarification. In: Mars, N. (ed.) Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building and Knowledge Sharing. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hayes, P.: RDF Semantics. Technical Report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Recommendation, February 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hefflin, J.: OWL Web Ontology Language Use Cases and Requirements. Technical Report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Recommendation, February 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Patel-Schneider, P.F., Horrocks, I.: A comparison of two modelling paradigms in the Semantic Web. J. Web Semant. 5(4), 240–250 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Klyne, G., Carroll, J.J.: Resource Description Framework (RDF): Concepts and Abstract Syntax. Technical Report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Recommendation, February 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lifschitz, V.: Nonmonotonic databases and epistemic queries. In: 12th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’91), Sydney, Australia (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Manola, F., Miller, M.: RDF Primer. Technical Report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Recommendation, February 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. McGuinness, D.L., Harmelen, F.V.: OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. Technical Report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Recommendation, February 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Patel-Schneider, P.F., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: OWL Web Ontology Language Guide Semantics and Abstract Syntax. Technical Report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Recommendation, February 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rector, A., Welty, C.: Simple part-whole relations in OWL Ontologies, W3C Working Draft, August 11 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Reiter, R.: On closed world data bases. In: Symposium on Logic and Data Bases (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B.C., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y.: Pellet: a practical owl-dl reasoner. J. Web Semant. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Smith, M.K., Welty, C., McGuinness, D.L.: OWL Web Ontology Language Guide. Technical Report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Recommendation, February 10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipto. Ingegneria e Scienza dell’Informazione, Università di Trento, Via Sommarive 14, 38100, Povo, TN, Italy

    Fausto Giunchiglia

  2. Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science, University of Trento, Trento, Italy

    Feroz Farazi

  3. Dipto. Elettronica e Informazione (DEI), Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio 34/5, 20133, Milan, Italy

    Letizia Tanca

  4. Dipto. Informatica e Automazione, Università Roma Tre, Via della Vasca Navale 79, 00146, Rome, Italy

    Roberto De Virgilio

Authors
  1. Fausto Giunchiglia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Feroz Farazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Letizia Tanca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roberto De Virgilio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fausto Giunchiglia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dipto. Informatica e Automazione, Università Roma Tre, Via della Vasca Navale 79, Roma, 00146, Italy

    Roberto de Virgilio

  2. Dipto. Ingegneria e Scienza, Università di Trento, Via Sommarive 14, Povo, 38100, Italy

    Fausto Giunchiglia

  3. Dipto. Elettronica e Informazione (DEI), Politecnico di Milano, Via Ponzio 34/5, Milano, 20133, Italy

    Letizia Tanca

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giunchiglia, F., Farazi, F., Tanca, L., De Virgilio, R. (2010). The Semantic Web Languages. In: de Virgilio, R., Giunchiglia, F., Tanca, L. (eds) Semantic Web Information Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04329-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04329-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04328-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04329-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation