Skip to main content

A Survey of Passive Image Tampering Detection

  • Conference paper
Book cover Digital Watermarking (IWDW 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 5703))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Digital images can be easily tampered with image editing tools. The detection of tampering operations is of great importance. Passive digital image tampering detection aims at verifying the authenticity of digital images without any a prior knowledge on the original images. There are various methods proposed in this filed in recent years. In this paper, we present an overview of these methods in three levels, that is low level, middle level, and high level in semantic sense. The main ideas of the proposed approaches at each level are described in detail, and some comments are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kundur, D., Hatzinakos, D.: Digital watermarking for telltale tamper proofing andauthentication. Proceedings of the IEEE 87(7), 1167–1180 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rey, C., Dugelay, J.: A survey of watermarking algorithms for image authentication. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing 2002(6), 613–621 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Sencar, H.T., Memon, N.: Overview of state-of-the-art in digital image forensics, part of indian statistical institute platinum jubilee monograph series titled ’statistical science and interdisciplinary research (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, M., Fridrich, J., Goljan, M., Lukas, J.: Determining image origin and integrity using sensor noise. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 3(1), 74–90 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin, Z., Wang, R., Tang, X., Shum, H.Y.: Detecting doctored images using camera response normality and consistency. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 1087–1092 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Farid, H.: Creating and detecting doctored and virtual images: Implications to the child pornography prevention act. Technical Report TR2004-518, Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li, Y., Sun, J., Tang, C., Shum, H.: Lazy snapping. In: International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 303–308. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ng, T.T., Chang, S.F., Lin, C.Y., Sun, Q.: Passive-blind image forensics. In: Multimedia Security Technologies for Digital Rights Management. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. He, J., Lin, Z., Wang, L., Tang, X.: Detecting doctored JPEG images via DCT coefficient analysis. In: Leonardis, A., Bischof, H., Pinz, A. (eds.) ECCV 2006. LNCS, vol. 3953, pp. 423–435. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Swaminathan, A., Wu, M., Liu, K.: Digital image forensics via intrinsic fingerprints. IEEE Trans. Info. Forensics and Security 3(1), 101–117 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Popescu, A., Farid, H.: Exposing digital forgeries in color filter array interpolated images. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 53(10), 3948–3959 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Popescu, A., Farid, H.: Exposing digital forgeries by detecting traces of resampling. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 53(2), 758–767 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Popescu, A., Farid, H.: Statistical tools for digital forensics. In: 6th International Workshop on Information Hiding, pp. 128–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Mahdian, B., Saic, S.: Blind authentication using periodic properties of interpolation. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 3(3), 529–538 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahdian, B., Saic, S.: Detection and description of geometrically transformed digital images. In: Proc. SPIE, Media Forensics and Security, vol. 7254, pp. 72540J–72548J (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson, M., Farid, H.: Exposing digital forgeries through chromatic aberration. In: Proceedings of the 8th workshop on Multimedia and security, pp. 48–55. ACM, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lukáš, J., Fridrich, J., Goljan, M.: Detecting digital image forgeries using sensor pattern noise. In: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, vol. 6072, pp. 362–372 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, M., Fridrich, J., Goljan, M., Lukas, J.: Determining image origin and integrity using sensor noise. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 3(1), 74–90 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Swaminathan, A., Wu, M., Liu, K.: Non-intrusive component forensics of visual sensors using output images. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 2(1), 91–106 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Swaminathan, A., Wu, M., Liu, K.: Component forensics of digital cameras: A non-intrusive approach. In: Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, pp. 1194–1199 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fu, D., Shi, Y., Su, W., et al.: A generalized Benford’s law for JPEG coefficients and its applications in image forensics. In: Proc. of SPIE Security, Steganography, and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents., vol. 6505, pp. 47–58 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Luo, W., Qu, Z., Huang, J., Qiu, G.: A novel method for detecting cropped and recompressed image block. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), vol. 2, pp. 217–220 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ye, S., Sun, Q., Chang, E.: Detecting digital image forgeries by measuring inconsistencies of blocking artifact. In: IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, pp. 12–15 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Farid, H.: Exposing digital forgeries form jpeg ghosts. IEEE transactions on information forensics and security 4(1), 154–160 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Farid, H., Lyu, S.: Higher-order wavelet statistics and their application to digital forensics. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bayram, S., Avcıbaş, İ., Sankur, B., Memon, N.: Image manipulation detection. Journal of Electronic Imaging 15(4), 1–17 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Avcibas, I., Memon, N., Sankur, B.: Steganalysis using image quality metrics. IEEE transactions on Image Processing 12(2), 221–229 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Avcibas, I.: Image steganalysis with binary similarity measures. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing 2005(17), 2749–2757 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Lyu, S., Farid, H.: Steganalysis using higher-order image statistics. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 1(1), 111–119 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shi, Y.Q., Chen, C.-H., Xuan, G., Su, W.: Steganalysis versus splicing detection. In: Shi, Y.Q., Kim, H.-J., Katzenbeisser, S. (eds.) IWDW 2007. LNCS, vol. 5041, pp. 158–172. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Shi, Y., Chen, C., Chen, W.: A natural image model approach to splicing detection. In: Proceedings of the 9th workshop on Multimedia & security, pp. 51–62. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Farid, H.: Detecting digital forgeries using bispectral analysis. Technical report, MIT AI Memo AIM-1657, MIT (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ng, T.T., Chang, S.F., Sun, Q.: Blind detection of photomontage using higher order statistics. In: IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. 5, pp. 688–691 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ng, T.T., Chang, S.F.: A model for image splicing. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, vol. 2, pp. 1169–1172 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fridrich, J., Soukal, D., Lukas, J.: Detection of copy-move forgery in digital images. In: Digital Forensic Research Workshop (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Popescu, A., Farid, H.: Exposing digital forgeries by detecting duplicated image regions. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, Dartmouth College

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bayram, S., Sencar, H.T., Memon, N.: An efficient and robust method for detecting copy-move forgery. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chen, W., Shi, Y., Su, W.: Image splicing detection using 2-d phase congruency and statistical moments of characteristic function. In: Security, Steganography and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents IX, Proceeding. of SPIE, San Jose, CA, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hsiao, D., Pei, S.: Detecting digital tampering by blur estimation. In: International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering, pp. 264–278 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Johnson, M., Farid, H.: Exposing digital forgeries by detecting inconsistencies in lighting. In: Proceedings of the workshop on Multimedia and security, pp. 1–10 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Johnson, M., Farid, H.: Exposing digital forgeries in complex lighting environments. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 2(3), 450–461 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Johnson, M., Farid, H.: Exposing digital forgeries through specular highlights on the eye. In: International Workshop on Information Hiding (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gloe, T., Kirchner, M., Winkler, A., Böhme, R.: Can we trust digital image forensics? In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Multimedia, pp. 78–86. ACM, New York (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. Kirchner, M., Bohme, R.: Tamper hiding: Defeating image forensics. In: Furon, T., Cayre, F., Doërr, G., Bas, P. (eds.) IH 2007. LNCS, vol. 4567, pp. 326–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Ng, T., Chang, S., Sun, Q.: A data set of authentic and spliced image blocks. Technical report, DVMM, Columbia University (2004), http://www.ee.columbia.edu/ln/dvmm/downloads/AuthSplicedDataSet/photographers.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, W., Dong, J., Tan, T. (2009). A Survey of Passive Image Tampering Detection. In: Ho, A.T.S., Shi, Y.Q., Kim, H.J., Barni, M. (eds) Digital Watermarking. IWDW 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5703. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03688-0_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03688-0_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03687-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03688-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics