Abstract
Animal cognition has grown exponentially in the last decade and more than ever has established close links with human cognition to jointly explore the mechanisms, ultimate functions, and evolution of cognition. The comparative method plays a key role in this endeavor. Knowledge about object-object relations is a good example of this growth, but just like the rest of animal cognition, it has been dominated by a two-tiered framework (perceptually based vs. conceptually based). Much of animal cognition is routinely reduced to associations between stimuli and responses. I argue that this view is too narrow with regard to apes’ knowledge about object-object relations. Instead, I propose that apes distinguish between arbitrary and causal relations between objects. This means that apes not only associate the presence of certain stimuli with certain events but also attribute a causal role between the presence of those objects and certain events.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baillargeon R (1995) Physical reasoning in infancy. In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The cognitive neurosciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 181-204
Boysen ST, Berntson GG, Shreyer TA, Quigley KS (1993) Processing of ordinality and transitivity by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 107:208-215
Bramble DM, Lieberman DE (2004) Endurance running and the evolution of Homo. Nature 432:345-352
Call J (2001) Object permanence in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and children (Homo sapiens)”. J Comp Psychol 115:159-171
Call J (2003) Beyond learning fixed rules and social cues: Abstraction in the social arena. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 358:1189-1196
Call J (2006a) Inferences by exclusion in the great apes: the effect of age and species. Anim Cogn 9:393-403
Call J (2006b) Descartes’ two errors: reasoning and reflection from a comparative perspective. In: Hurley S, Nudds M (eds) Rational animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 219-234
Call J (2007a) Apes know that hidden objects can affect the orientation of other objects. Cognition 105:1-25
Call J (2007b) Past and present challenges in theory of mind research in primates. In: van Hofsten C, Rosander K (eds) Progress in brain research, vol 164. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 341-354
Call J (in press). Trapping the minds of apes: causal knowledge and inferential reasoning about objects. In: Lonsdorf E and Ross S (Eds.). Chimpanzee minds. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
Call J, Carpenter M (2001) Do chimpanzees and children know what they have seen? Anim Cogn 4:207-220
Call J, Tomasello M (2005a) What chimpanzees know about seeing revisited: an explanation of the third kind. In: Eilan N, Hoerl C, McCormack T, Roessler J (eds) Joint attention: communication and other minds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 45-64
Call J, Tomasello M (2005b) Reasoning and thinking in nonhuman primates. In: Holyoak KJ, Morrison RG (eds) Cambridge handbook on thinking and reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 607-632
Call J, Tomasello M (2008) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends Cogn Sci 12:187-192
Cunningham CL, Anderson JR, Mootnick AR (2006) Object manipulation to obtain a food reward in hoolock gibbons, Bunopithecus hoolock. Anim Behav 71:621-629
Fujita K, Kuroshima H, Asai S (2003) How do tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) understand causality involved in tool use? J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 29:233-242
Gillan DJ (1981) Reasoning in the chimpanzee: II. Transitive inference. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 7:150-164
Girndt A, Meier T, Call J (2008) Task constraints mask great apes’ proficiency in the trap-table task. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 34:54-62
Gopnik A, Schulz L (2007) Causal learning. Psychology, philosophy, and computation. New York, Oxford University Press, p 358
Hanus D, Call J (2008) Chimpanzees infer the location of a reward based on the effect of its weight. Curr Biol 18(6):R1-2
Harlow HF (1949) The formation of learning sets. Psychol Rev 56:51-65
Hashiya K, Kojima S (2001) Hearing and auditory-visual intermodal recognition in the chimpanzee. In: Matsuzawa T (ed) Primate origins of human cognition and behavior. Springer, Berlin, pp 155-189
Hauser M, Spaulding B (2007) Wild rhesus monkeys generate causal inferences about possible and impossible physical transformations in the absence of experience. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:7181-7185
Hemmi JM, Menzel CR (1995) Foraging strategies of long-tailed macaques, Macaca fascicularis: directional extrapolation. Anim Behav 49:457-463
Herrmann E, Call J, Hare B, Hernandez-Lloreda MV, Tomasello M (2007) Humans have evolved specialized skills of social cognition: the cultural intelligence hypothesis. Science 317:1360-1366
Iriki A, Sakura O (2008) The neuroscience of primate intellectual evolution: natural selection and passive and intentional niche construction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363:2229-2241
Karmiloff-Smith A (1992) Beyond modularity. A developmental perspective on cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Köhler W (1925) The mentality of apes. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Limongelli L, Boysen ST, Visalberghi E (1995) Comprehension of cause-effect relations in a tool-using task by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol 109:18-26
Martin-Ordas G and Call J (in press). Assessing generalization within and between trap tasks in the great apes. Int J Comp Psychol
Martin-Ordas G, Call J, Colmenares F (2008) Tubes, tables and traps: great apes solve two functionally equivalent trap tasks but show no evidence of transfer across tasks. Anim Cogn 11:423-430
Martin-Ordas G, Call J (2009) Assessing generalization within and between trap tasks in the great apes. Inter J of Comp Psychol 22:43-60
Menzel CR (1996) Spontaneous use of matching visual cues during foraging by long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). J Comp Psychol 110:370-376
Mulcahy NJ, Call J (2006) How great apes perform on a modified trap-tube task. Anim Cogn 9:193-199
Natale F, Potì P, Spinozzi G (1988) Development of tool use in a macaque and a gorilla. Primates 29:413-416
Penn D, Povinelli DJ (2007) Causal cognition in human and nonhuman animals: a comparative, critical review. Annu Rev Psychol 58:97-118
Piaget J (Ed.) (1952) The origins of intelligence in children. New York: Norton
Povinelli D (2000) Folk physics for apes: a chimpanzee’s theory of how the world works. University Press, Oxford
Premack AJ, Premack D (1983) The mind of an ape. Norton, New York
Premack D, Premack AJ (1994) Levels of causal understanding in chimpanzees and children. Cognition 50:347-362
Seed AM, Call J, Emery NJ, Clayton NS (2009) Chimpanzees solve the trap problem when the confound of tool-use is removed. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process 35(1):23-34
Sperber D, Premack D, Premack AJ (1995) Causal cognition. A multidisciplinary debate. Oxford University Press, New York
Spinozzi G, Potì P (1989) Causality I: The support problem. En F. Antinucci (Ed.). Cognitive Structure and Development in Nonhuman Primates (pp. 113-119). Hilldsale (New Jersey): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Tebbich S, Bshary R (2004) Cognitive abilities related to tool use in the woodpecker finch, Cactospiza pallida. Anim Behav 67:689-697
Tomasello M, Call J (1997) Primate cognition. Oxford University Press, New York
Tomonaga M (1993) Tests for control by exclusion and negative stimulus relations of arbitrary matching to sample in a “symmetry-emergent” chimpanzee. J Exp Anal Behav 59:215-229
Visalberghi E, Limongelli L (1994) Lack of comprehension of cause-effect relations in tool-using capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 108:15-22
Yamamoto J, Asano T (1995) Stimulus equivalence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Psychol Rec 45:3-21
Acknowledgments
I thank Amanda Seed for her helpful comments on a previous version of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Call, J. (2010). Understanding Apes to Understand Humans: The Case of Object-Object Relations. In: Glatzeder, B., Goel, V., Müller, A. (eds) Towards a Theory of Thinking. On Thinking. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03129-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03129-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03128-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03129-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)