Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms pp 55–85Cite as

Kin recognition: an overview of conceptual issues, mechanisms and evolutionary theory

  • Chapter

Abstract

Kin recognition (KR) is the ability to identify or distinguish kin from nonkin, and it is thought to be an important driving force in the evolution of social and sexual behaviour. Here, we provide an introduction to KR, including an overview of the main debates, the underlying mechanisms and evolutionary analyses. First, we examine the many evolving definitions for KR, as these have caused some confusion and debate. We explain why retaining both broad and narrow definitions can be instructive for thinking about the problem. Second, we provide examples of the different types of KR from empirical studies, ranging from the use of spatial cues to selfinspection and green-beard genes. We also suggest a classification scheme of the different mechanisms based on whether they are considered to be KR in the broad or in the narrow sense. Third, we consider the key components necessary for most or all KR mechanisms, and explain why the central problem for any recognition mechanism is to balance the risk of acceptance versus rejection errors. Fourth, we summarise theoretical analyses addressing the evolution of nepotism through kin recognition, and the maintenance of genetic polymorphisms controlling KR. Fifth, we examine evolutionary analyses of apparent KR failures, errors, and mistakes. Finally, we suggest some of the main challenges that need to be addressed in future KR research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander RD, Borgia G (1978) Group selection, altruism, and the levels of organization of life. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 9:449-474

    Google Scholar 

  • Antal T, Ohtsuki H, Wakeley J, Taylor PD, Nowak MA (2009) Evolution of cooperation by phenotypic similarity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:8597-8600

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R, Hammond RA, Grafen A (2004) Altruism via kin-selection strategies that rely on arbitrary tags with which they coevolve. Evolution 58:1833-1838

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard CJ (1991) Kinship and social behavior: the trouble with relatives. Trends Ecol Evol 6:310-312

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard CJ, Hurst JL, Aldhous P (1991) Of mice and kin: the functional significance of kin bias in social behavior. Biol Rev 66:379-430

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beecher MD (1991) Success and failures of parent-offspring recognition in animals. In: Hepper PG (ed) Kin Recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 95-124

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecher MD, Beecher IM, Hahn S (1981) Parent-offspring recognition in bank swallows (Riparia riparia). II. Development and acoustic basis. Anim Behav 29:95-101

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein AR, Bekoff M, Byers JA, Daniels TJ (1991) Kin recognition in vertebrates: what do we really know about adaptive value? Anim Behav 41:1079-1083

    Google Scholar 

  • Bressan P, Zucchi G (2009) Human kin recognition is self-rather than familyreferential. Biol Lett 5:336-338

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JL, Eklund A (1994) Kin recognition and the major histocompatibility complex: an integrative review. Am Nat 143:435-461

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers JA, Bekoff M (1986) What does ‘kin recognition’ mean? Ethology 72:342-345

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers JA, Bekoff M (1991) Development, the conveniently forgotten variable in ‘true kin recognition’. Anim Behav 41:1088-1090

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke FM, Faulkes CG (1999) Kin discrimination and female mate choice in the naked mole-rat Heterocephalus glaber. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1995-2002

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton WGR, Hurst LD (1994) True kin recognition, in the form of somatic incompatibility, has multiple independent origins. Anim Behav 47:230-234

    Google Scholar 

  • Crnokrak P, Roff DA (1999) Inbreeding depression in the wild. Heredity 83:260-270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH (1986) Genetic clonal recognition abilities in marine invertebrates must be maintained by selection for something else. Evolution 40:1100-1101

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier RH (1987) Genetic aspects of kin recognition: concepts, models, and synthesis. In: Fletcher DJC, Michener CD (eds) Kin Recognition in Animals. Wiley, New York, pp 55-73

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Hatchwell BJ, Robson T, Burke T (1992) Paternity and parental effort in dunnocks Prunella modularis – how good are male chick-feeding rules. Anim Behav 43:729-745

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1979) Twelve misunderstandings of kin selection. Z Tierpsychol 51:184-200

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1982) The Extended Phenotype: the Gene as the Unit of Selection. WH Freeman, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBruine LM (2002) Facial resemblance enhances trust. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1307-1312

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1982) Avoidance of incestuous breeding between siblings in two species of Peromyscus mice. Biol Behav 7:157-169

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley SA, File AL (2007) Kin recognition in an annual plant. Biol Lett 3:435-438

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood RW, Ostermeyer MC (1984) Does copulation inhibit infanticide in male rodents? Anim Behav 32:293-294

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher DJC, Michener CD (1987) Kin Recognition in Animals. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frommen JG, Luz C, Bakker TCM (2007a) Kin discrimination in sticklebacks is mediated by social learning rather than innate recognition. Ethology 113:276-282

    Google Scholar 

  • Frommen JG, Mehlis M, Brendler C, Bakker TCM (2007b) Shoaling decisions in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) – familiarity, kinship and inbreeding. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:533-539

    Google Scholar 

  • Galef BG Jr (1976) Social transmission of acquired behavior: a discussion of tradition and social learning in vertebrates. Adv Stud Behav 6:77-100

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamboa GJ, Reeve HK, Holmes WG (1991) Conceptual issues and methodology in kin-ecognition research: a critical discussion. Ethology 88:109-127

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner A, West SA (2007) Social evolution: the decline and fall of genetic kin recognition. Curr Biol 17:R810-R812

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ, Vrba ES (1982) Exaptation – a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8:4-15

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1990) Do animals really recognise kin? Anim Behav 39:42-54

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1991a) Kin vision? A reply to Stuart. Anim Behav 41:1095-1096

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1991b) A reply to Blaustein et al. Anim Behav 41:1085-1087

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A (1991c) A reply to Byers and Bekoff. Anim Behav 41:1091-1092

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin AS, West SA (2002) Kin selection: fact and fiction. Trends Ecol Evol 17:15-21

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosberg RK, Quinn JF (1986) The genetic control and consequences of kin recognition by larvae of a colonial marine invertebrate. Nature 322:456-459

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig D (1996) Gestational drive and the green-bearded placenta. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:6547-6551

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halpin ZT (1986) Individual odors among mammals: origins and functions. Adv Stud Behav 16:39-70

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpin ZT (1991) Kin recognition cues of vertebrates. In: Hepper PG (ed) Kin Recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 220-258

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I. J Theor Biol 7:1-16

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1975) Innate social aptitudes of man: an approachfrom evolutionary genetics. In: Fox R (ed) ASA Studies 4: Biosocial Anthropology. Malaby Press, London, pp 133-153

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1996) Narrow Roads of Gene Land. WH Freeman, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare JF, Sealy SG, Underwood TJ, Ellison KS, Stewart RLM (2002) Evidence of self-referent phenotype matching revisited: airing out the armpit effect. Anim Cogn 6:65-68

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley IR, Davies NB, Hatchwell BJ, Desrochers A, Nebel D, Burke T (1995) The polygynandrous mating system of the alpine accentor, Prunella collaris. II. Multiple paternity and parental effort. Anim Behav 49:789-803

    Google Scholar 

  • Helanterä H, Bargum K (2007) Pedigree relatedness, not greenbeard genes, explains eusociality. Oikos 116:217-220

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepper PG (1991a) Kin Recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepper PG (1991b) Recognizing kin: ontogeny and classification. In: Hepper PG (ed) Kin Recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 259-288

    Google Scholar 

  • Heth G, Todrank J (2001) Self referencing in hamsters: comment from Heth and Todrank. Trends Ecol Evol 16:74

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes WG (2004) The early history of Hamiltonian-based research on kin recognition. Ann Zool Fennici 41:691-711

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes WG, Sherman PW (1982) The ontogeny of kin recognition in two species of ground squirrels. Am Zool 22:491-517

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes WG, Sherman PW (1983) Kin recognition in animals. Am Sci 71:46-55

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes WOH, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FLW (2008) Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320:1213-1216

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen VAA, van Baalen M (2006) Altruism through beard chromodynamics. Nature 440:663-666

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone RA (1997) Recognition and the evolution of distinctive signatures: when does it pay to reveal identity? Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1547-1553

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller L, Ross KG (1998) Selfish genes: a green beard in the red fire ant. Nature 394:573-575

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kempenaers B, Sheldon BC (1996) Why do male birds not discriminate between their own and extra-pair offspring? Anim Behav 51:1165-1173

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuester J, Paul A, Arnemann J (1994) Kinship, familiarity and mating avoidance in Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus. Anim Behav 48:1183-1194

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacy RC, Sherman PW (1983) Kin recognition by phenotype matching. Am Nat 121:489-512

    Google Scholar 

  • Leinders-Zufall T, Brennan P, Widmayer P, Chandramani P, Maul-Pavicic A, Jager M, Li X-H, Breer H, Zufall F, Boehm T (2004) MHC class I peptides as chemosensory signals in the vomeronasal organ. Science 306:1033-1037

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman D, Tooby J, Cosmides L (2007) The architecture of human kin detection. Nature 445:727-731

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liebert AE, Starks PT (2004) The action component of recognition systems: a focus on the response. Ann Zool Fennici 41:747-764

    Google Scholar 

  • Manica A (2002) Filial cannibalism in teleost fish. Biol Rev 77:261-277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Manning CJ, Wakeland EK, Potts WK (1992) Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition. Nature 360:581-583

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mateo JM (2004) Recognition systems and biological organization: the perception component of social recognition. Ann Zool Fennici 41:729-745

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateo JM, Johnston RE (2000) Kin recognition and the ‘armpit effect’: evidence of self-referent phenotype matching. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:695-700

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mateo JM, Johnston RE (2001) Self referencing in hamsters: reply from Hauber and Sherman. Trends Ecol Evol 16:74-75

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateo JM, Johnston RE (2003) Kin recognition by self-referent phenotype matching: weighing the evidence. Anim Cogn 6:73-76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McRae SB (1996) Family values: costs and benefits of communal nesting in the moorhen. Anim Behav 52:225-245

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M (2006) The major histocompatibility complex, sexual selection, and mate choice. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:159-186

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore T, Moore HD (2002) Marsupial sperm pairing: a case of ‘sticky’ green beards? Trends Ecol Evol 17:112-113

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller JK, Eggert A-K (1990) Time-dependent shifts between infanticidal and parental behavior in female burying beetles: a mechanism of indirect motheroffspring recognition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:11-16

    Google Scholar 

  • Neff BD, Sherman PW (2002) Decision making and recognition mechanisms. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1435-1441

    Google Scholar 

  • Novotny MV, Soini HA, Koyama S, Wiesler D, Bruce KE, Penn DJ (2007) Chemical identification of MHC-influenced volatile compounds in mouse urine. I: quantitative proportions of major chemosignals. J Chem Ecol 33:417-434

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pagel M (1997) Desperately concealing father: a theory of parent-infant resemblance. Anim Behav 53:973-981

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn DJ (2002) The scent of genetic compatibility: sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex. Ethology 108:1-21

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn DJ, Potts WK (1998) MHC-disassortative mating preferences reversed by cross-fostering. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1299-1306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penn DJ, Potts WK (1999) The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes. Am Nat 153:145-164

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn DJ, Damjanovich K, Potts WK (2002) MHC heterozygosity confers a selective advantage against multiple-strain infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11260-11264

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petrie M, Krupa A, Burke T (1999) Peacocks lek with relatives even in the absence of social and environmental cues. Nature 401:155-157

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfennig DW, Reeve HK, Sherman PW (1993) Kin recognition and cannibalism in spadefoot toad tadpoles. Anim Behav 46:87-94

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter RH (1988) The ontogeny of sibling recognition in rodents: superfamily Muroidea. Behav Gen 18:483-494

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Porter RH (1991) Mutual mother-infant recognition in humans. In: Hepper PG (ed) Kin Recognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 413-432

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter RH, Tepper VJ, White DM (1981) Experimental influence on the development of huddling preferences and ‘sibling’ recognition in spiny mice. Dev Psychobiol 14:375-382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC, Ponte E, Bozzaro S, Strassmann JE (2003) Single-gene greenbeard effects in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum. Science 299:105-106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve HK (1989) The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds. Am Nat 133:407-435

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve HK, Sherman PW (2001) Optimality and phylogeny: a critique of current thought. In: Orzack SH, Sober E (eds) Adaptationism and Optimality. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 64-113

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M, Grafen A (1981) Are green beard genes outlaws? Anim Behav 29:954-955

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousset F, Roze D (2007) Constraints on the origin and maintenance of genetic kin recognition. Evolution 61:2320-2330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schausberger P (2007) Kin recognition by juvenile predatory mites: prior association or phenotype matching? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:119-125

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman PW, Holmes WG (1985) Kin recognition: issues and evidence. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. Gustav Fischer-Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 437-460

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman PW, Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (1997) Recognition systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 69-98

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinervo B, Chaine A, Clobert J, Calsbeek R, Hazard L, Lancaster L, McAdam AG, Alonzo S, Corrigan G, Hochberg ME (2006) Self-recognition, color signals, and cycles of greenbeard mutualism and altruism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:7372-7377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smukalla S, Caldara M, Pochet N, Beauvais A, Guadagnini S, Yan C, Vinces MD, Jansen A, Prevost MC, Latge J-P, Fink GR, Foster KR, Verstrepen KJ (2008) FLO1 is a variable green beard gene that drives biofilm-like cooperation in budding yeast. Cell 135:726-737

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart RJ (1991) Kin recognition as a functional concept. Anim Behav 41:1093-1094

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers K, Crespi B (2005) Cadherins in maternal-foetal interactions: red queen with a green beard? Proc R Soc Lond B 272:643-649

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tang-Martinez Z (2001) The mechanisms of kin discrimination and the evolution of kin recognition in vertebrates: a critical re-evaluation. Behav Proc 53:21-40

    Google Scholar 

  • Thünken T, Bakker TCM, Baldauf SA, Kullmann H (2007a) Active inbreeding in a cichlid fish and its adaptive significance. Curr Biol 17:225-229

    Google Scholar 

  • Thünken T, Bakker TCM, Baldauf SA, Kullmann H (2007b) Direct familiarity does not alter mating preference for sisters in male Pelvicachromis taeniatus (Cichlidae). Ethology 113:1107-1112

    Google Scholar 

  • Todrank J, Heth G (2003) Odor-genes covariance and genetic relatedness assessments: rethinking odor-based ‘recognition’ mechanisms in rodents. Adv Stud Behav 32:77-130

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsutsui ND (2004) Scents of self: the expression component of self/nonself recognition systems. Ann Zool Fennici 41:713-727

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Jeugd HP, van der Veen IT, Larsson K (2002) Kin clustering in barnacle geese: familiarity or phenotype matching? Behav Ecol 13:786-790

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Meer RK, Alonso LE (2002) Queen primer pheromone affects conspecific fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) aggression. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:122-130

    Google Scholar 

  • Villinger J, Waldman B (2008) Self-referent MHC type matching in frog tadpoles. Proc R Soc Lond B 275:1225-1230

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman B (1987) Mechanisms of kin recognition. J Theor Biol 128:159-185

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman B (1988) The ecology of kin recognition. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:543-571

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman B, Frumhoff PC, Sherman PW (1988) Problems of kin recognition. Trends Ecol Evol 3:8-13

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West SA, Pen I, Griffin AS (2002) Cooperation and competition between relatives. Science 296:72-75

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westermarck EA (1891) The History of Human Marriage. Macmillian, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Willse A, Belcher AM, Preti G, Wahl JH, Thresher M, Yang P, Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK (2005) Identification of major histocompatibility complexregulated body odorants by statistical analysis of a comparative gas chromatography/mass spectrometry experiment. Anal Chem 77:2348-2361

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willse A, Kwak J, Yamazaki K, Preti G, Wahl JH, Beauchamp GK (2006) Individual odortypes: interaction of MHC and background genes. Immunogenetics 58:967-982

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Havard University Press, Cambridge/MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt TD (2003) Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK, Kupniewski D, Bard J, Thomas L, Boyse EA (1988) Familial imprinting determines H-2 selective mating preferences. Science 240:1331-1332

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK, Curran M, Bard J, Boyse EA (2000) Parentprogeny recognition as a function of MHC odortype identity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:10500-10502

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Konrad Lorenz Institute for Ethology, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria

    Dustin J. Penn & Joachim G. Frommen

Authors
  1. Dustin J. Penn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joachim G. Frommen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Sociobiology/Anthropology & CRC Evolution of Social Behavior & German Primate Center, Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology Unit, University of Göttingen, Kellnerweg 6, 37077, Göttingen, Germany

    Peter Kappeler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Penn, D., Frommen, J. (2010). Kin recognition: an overview of conceptual issues, mechanisms and evolutionary theory. In: Kappeler, P. (eds) Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02624-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation