Abstract
In the chapter, Sriraman and English offer a wide-ranging survey of theories and philosophies of mathematics education. They begin by pointing out that each of those theories needs to clarify its ontology, methodologies, and epistemology and that these might form the foundations of a philosophy for the field. The work and influence of Lakatos get special consideration in that regard. The authors’ attention then shifts from philosophy to questions of theory and theory development, noting the proliferation of complexity in our field—in both phenomena and issues. They maintain that theory is more prominent today in mathematics education than in the past and ask what that theory might be, how it has changed, what the effects of those changes have been, what Europeans think about theory development, and what the future might hold. Theory, they claim, needs to be better harmonized with research and practice if the field is to move forward.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bishop, A. (1977). On loosening the contents. In L. Murray (Ed.), Meaningful Mathematics (pp. 1–4). Melbourne: Mathematics Association of Victoria.
Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical Enculturation: A Cultural Perspective on Mathematical Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Howson, G., Keitel, K., & Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Curriculum Development in Mathematics (paperback re-issue). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1981).
Kilpatrick, J. (1981). Research on mathematical learning and thinking in the United States. Recherche en Didactique des Mathématiques, 2, 363–379.
Kilpatrick, J. (2008). The development of mathematics education as an academic field. In M. Menghini, F. Furinghetti, L. Giacardi, & F. Arzarello (Eds.), The First Century of the International Commission on Mathematical Instruction (1908–2008): Reflecting and Shaping the World of Mathematics Education (pp. 25–39). Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana.
Moon, B. (1986). The ‘New Maths’ Curriculum Controversy: An International Story. London: Falmer.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2000). Purposes and methods of research in mathematics education. Notices of the AMS, 47(6), 641–649.
Silver, E. A., & Herbst, P. G. (2007). Theory in mathematics education scholarship. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 39–67). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kilpatrick, J. (2010). Preface to Part I. In: Sriraman, B., English, L. (eds) Theories of Mathematics Education. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00741-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00742-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)