Skip to main content

Biological Remediation of Soil: An Overview of Global Market and Available Technologies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Applied Bioremediation

Part of the book series: Soil Biology ((SOILBIOL,volume 17))

Abstract

Due to a wide range of industrial and agricultural activities, a high number of chemical contaminants is released into the environment, causing a significant concern regarding potential toxicity, carcinogenicity, and potential for bioaccumulation in living systems of various chemicals in soil. Although microbial activity in soil accounts for most of the degradation of organic contaminants, chemical and physical mechanisms can also provide significant transformation pathways for these compounds. The specific remediation processes that have been applied to clean up contaminated sites include natural attenuation, landfarming, biopiling or composting, contained slurry bioreactor, bioventing, soil vapor extraction, thermal desorption, incineration, soil washing and land filling (USEPA 2004).

Biological remediation using microorganisms and plants is generally considered a safe and less expensive method for the removal of hazardous contaminants. The microorganisms have the primary catalytic role in degrading or mineralizing various contaminants and converting non-toxic by-products during soil bioremediation processes (Seshadri and Heidelberg 2005; Head et al. 2006; Gomez et al. 2007). Plants have an inherent ability to detoxify some xenobiotics in soil by direct uptake of the contaminants, followed by subsequent transformation using enzymes similar to detoxification enzymes in mammals, transport and product accumulation (Macek et al. 2008). Phytoremediation, with the associated role of rhizospheric microorganisms, is therefore an important tool in bioremediation processes. Various bioremediation configurations as options for treatment of different classes of chemicals have been evaluated (Hughes et al. 2000). Natural attenuation and electron donor delivery were considered as options for remediation of chlorinated solvents, biostimulation for treatment of chlorinated solvents and phenols, bioventing for polycyclic aromatic carbons (PAHs); landfarming or composting were options for nitroaromatics, phenols, monoaromatic hydrocarbon and PAHs (Prince 1998; Mishra et al. 2001). Slurry bioreactor processes were considered suitable for treatment of all of the above mentioned chemicals. Optimizing the environmental conditions in bioremediation processes ensures that the physiological and biochemical activities are directed towards biodegradation of the target contaminants. Environmental factors influencing biological activity include moisture, temperature, pH, oxygen, soil type and chemical nature of contaminant for aerobic degradation and redox potential for anaerobic degradation (Van Hamme et al. 2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AEGIS (2003) A decade of challenge — Canadian environmental industry — competitiveness analysis

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni V, Gianfreda L (2007) Bioremediation and monitoring of aromatic-polluted habitats. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 76:287–308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borden RC, Ximena Rodriguez B (2006) Evaluation of slow release substrates for anaerobic bioremediation. Biorem J 10:59–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CTCS (2002) Environmental technologies handbook, 5th edn. Canadian Trade Commissioner Service

    Google Scholar 

  • de Carcer DA (2007) The introduction of genetically modified microorganisms designed for rhizoremediation induces changes on native bacteria in the rhizosphere but not in the surrounding soil. ISME J 1:215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lorenzo V (2006) Blue-print of an oil-eating bacterium. Nat Biotechnol 24:952–953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delphi Group (2003). Market intelligence scoping — remediation sub-sector

    Google Scholar 

  • Eapen S, Singh S, D’Souza SF (2007) Advances in development of transgenic plants for remediation of xenobiotic pollutants. Biotechnol Adv 25:442–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EcoLog Group (2005) HazMat magazine: state of the industry. December/January Issue

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis LB, Roe D, Wackett LP (2006) The University of Minnesota Biocatalysis/Biodegradation Database: the first decade. Nucleic Acids Res 34:D517–D521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez MJ, Pazos F, Guijarro FJ, de Lorenzo V, Valencia A (2007) The environmental fate of organic pollutants through the global microbial metabolism. Mol Syst Biol 3:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg M, Powers C, Mayer H, Kossen D (2007) Root causes of unsatisfactory performance of large and complex remediation projects — lessons learned from the United States Department of Energy environmental management programs. Remediation 18:83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head IM, Martin Jones D, Röling WFM (2006) Marine microorganisms make a meal of oil. Nat. Rev Microbiol 4:173–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hou BK, Wackett LP, Ellis LB (2003) Microbial pathway prediction: a functional group approach. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43:1051–1057

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes JB, Neale CN, Ward CH (2000) Bioremediation. In: Enclyclopedia of Microbiology, 2nd edn. Academic, New York, pp 587–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter-Cevera JC (1998) The value of microbial diversity. Curr Opin Microbiol 1:278–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Industry Canada (2008) Environmental Industries. http://www.ic.gc.ca/epic/site/ea-ae.nsf/en/ea02203e.html

  • JETRO (2007) Attractive sectors: environment. Japan External Trade Organization, Invest Japan Division, Invest Japan Department, Tokyo, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostelnik KM, Clarke JH (2008) Managing residual contaminants — reuse and isolation case studies. Remediation 18:75–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd JR, Lovley D (2001) Microbial detoxification of metals and radionuclides. Curr Top Biotechnol 12:248–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macek T, Kotrba P, Svatos A, Novakova M, Demnerova K, Mackova M (2008) Novel roles for genetically modified plants in environmental protection. Trends Biotechnol 26:146–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mackova M, Dowling D, Macek T (eds) (2006) Phytoremediation and rhizoremediation. Theoretical background. Focus on biotechnology, vol 9A. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Masons Water Yearbook (2000–2001) http://www.eic-yearbook.co.uk/rem_ind.htm

  • Mishra S, Jyot J, Kuhad RC, Lal B (2001) In situ bioremediation potential of an oily sludge-degrading bacterial consortium. Curr Microbiol 43:328–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prince RC (1998) Bioremediation. In: Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. Supplement to the 4th edn. Wiley, New York, pp 48–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Rylott EL, Jackson RG, Edwards J, Womack GL, Seth-Smith HMB, Rathbone DA, Strand SE, Bruce NC (2006) An explosive-degrading cytochrome P450 activity and its targeted application for the phytoremediation of RDX. Nat Biotechnol 24:216–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seshadri R, Heidelberg J (2005) Bacteria to the rescue. Nat Biotechnol 23:1236–1237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Simon JH (2008) Novel methods of identifying contaminants and monitoring remediation. Remediation 18:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon S (2004) Hazardous site clean-up: a focus on triad. Remediation 15:1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A, Van Hamme JD, Ward OP (2007) Surfactants in microbiology and biotechnology: Part 2. Application aspects. Biotechnol Adv 25:99–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spira Y, Henstock J, Nathanail P, Müller D, Edwards D (2006) A European approach to increase innovative soil and groundwater remediation technology applications. Remediation 16:81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada (2004) Environment industry survey business sector, Minister of Industry, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Tratnyek PG, Johnson RL (2006) Nanotechnologies for environmental cleanup. Nano Today 1:44–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urbance JW, Cole J, Saxman P, Tiedje JM (2003) BSD: the biodegradative strain database. Nucleic Acids Res 31:152–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2004) Cleaning up the Nation’s waste sites: markets and technology trends. technology innovation and field services division, office of solid waste and emergency response, EPA 542-R-04–015

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2007) Proceedings of the nanotechnology site remediation workshop. Region 5 Superfund Division, EPA 905K07001

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hamme JD, Singh A, Ward OP (2003) Recent advances in petroleum microbiology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 7:503–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Hamme JD, Singh A, Ward OP (2006) Petroleum microbiology. Part 1. Underlying biochemistry and physiology. Chim Oggi (Chem Today) 24:52–56

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward OP (2004). The industrial sustainability of bioremediation processes. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 31:1–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward OP, Singh A, Van Hamme J (2003) Accelerated biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbon waste. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 30:260–270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watlington K (2005) Emerging nanotechnologies for site remediation and wastewater treatment. Prepared for USEPA, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation (http://www.clu-in.org)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajay Singh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Singh, A., Kuhad, R.C., Ward, O.P. (2009). Biological Remediation of Soil: An Overview of Global Market and Available Technologies. In: Singh, A., Kuhad, R., Ward, O. (eds) Advances in Applied Bioremediation. Soil Biology, vol 17. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89621-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics